Cargando…

Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)

BACKGROUND: Bag-Mask Ventilation (BMV) is a crucial skill in managing emergency airway situations and induction of general anesthesia. Ensuring proficient BMV execution is imperative for healthcare providers. Various techniques exist for performing BMV. This study aims to compare the quality of vent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balafar, Moloud, Pouraghaei, Mahboub, Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya, Abad, Saba Nemati Ahmad, Soleimanpour, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02349-w
_version_ 1785148920042618880
author Balafar, Moloud
Pouraghaei, Mahboub
Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya
Abad, Saba Nemati Ahmad
Soleimanpour, Hassan
author_facet Balafar, Moloud
Pouraghaei, Mahboub
Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya
Abad, Saba Nemati Ahmad
Soleimanpour, Hassan
author_sort Balafar, Moloud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bag-Mask Ventilation (BMV) is a crucial skill in managing emergency airway situations and induction of general anesthesia. Ensuring proficient BMV execution is imperative for healthcare providers. Various techniques exist for performing BMV. This study aims to compare the quality of ventilation achieved using the E/C technique, Thenar Eminence (T/E) technique and a novel approach referred to as the hook technique. The goal is to identify the most effective single-person BMV method. METHOD: We conduct a pilot study on manikins involving 63 medical staff members who used the hook technique for ventilation. Subsequently, we obtained ethical approval and patient guardian consent to perform the study on 492 emergency department (ED) patients. These patients were randomly divided into three groups, with each group subjected to one three ventilation techniques. The study focused on patients requiring reliable airway management for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Ventilation was administrated using bag-mask device connected to the capnograph. End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels were recorded. Demographic data were collected and analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Success rates were reported as frequency (percentage) as well as mean ± standard deviation. RESULT: Comparing partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) results obtained via capnography between T/E, E/C and hook techniques, we found that the successful ventilation rate was 87.2% for T/E, 89.6% for E/C, and 93.3% for the hook methods. The hook method demonstrated significantly higher success rate compared to the other two techniques (P-value = 0.038). Furthermore, we observed statistically significant trends in PCO2 changes between measurements both within and between groups (P-value < 0/001). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that the hook method achieved notably higher success rate in ventilation compared to the T/E and E/C methods. This suggests that the hook method, which involves a chin lift maneuver while securely fitting the mask, could serve as a novel BMV technique, particularly for resuscitation with small hands for a prolonged use without fatigue and finger discomfort. Our finding contributes to the development of a new BMV method referred to as the hook technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT registration number: IRCT20121010011067N5. URL of trial registry record: https://www.irct.ir/trial/57420.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106663072023-11-23 Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique) Balafar, Moloud Pouraghaei, Mahboub Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya Abad, Saba Nemati Ahmad Soleimanpour, Hassan BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Bag-Mask Ventilation (BMV) is a crucial skill in managing emergency airway situations and induction of general anesthesia. Ensuring proficient BMV execution is imperative for healthcare providers. Various techniques exist for performing BMV. This study aims to compare the quality of ventilation achieved using the E/C technique, Thenar Eminence (T/E) technique and a novel approach referred to as the hook technique. The goal is to identify the most effective single-person BMV method. METHOD: We conduct a pilot study on manikins involving 63 medical staff members who used the hook technique for ventilation. Subsequently, we obtained ethical approval and patient guardian consent to perform the study on 492 emergency department (ED) patients. These patients were randomly divided into three groups, with each group subjected to one three ventilation techniques. The study focused on patients requiring reliable airway management for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Ventilation was administrated using bag-mask device connected to the capnograph. End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels were recorded. Demographic data were collected and analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Success rates were reported as frequency (percentage) as well as mean ± standard deviation. RESULT: Comparing partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) results obtained via capnography between T/E, E/C and hook techniques, we found that the successful ventilation rate was 87.2% for T/E, 89.6% for E/C, and 93.3% for the hook methods. The hook method demonstrated significantly higher success rate compared to the other two techniques (P-value = 0.038). Furthermore, we observed statistically significant trends in PCO2 changes between measurements both within and between groups (P-value < 0/001). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that the hook method achieved notably higher success rate in ventilation compared to the T/E and E/C methods. This suggests that the hook method, which involves a chin lift maneuver while securely fitting the mask, could serve as a novel BMV technique, particularly for resuscitation with small hands for a prolonged use without fatigue and finger discomfort. Our finding contributes to the development of a new BMV method referred to as the hook technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT registration number: IRCT20121010011067N5. URL of trial registry record: https://www.irct.ir/trial/57420. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10666307/ /pubmed/37996828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02349-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Balafar, Moloud
Pouraghaei, Mahboub
Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya
Abad, Saba Nemati Ahmad
Soleimanpour, Hassan
Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
title Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
title_full Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
title_fullStr Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
title_short Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
title_sort evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by e/c, t/e and hook technique (a new proposed technique)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02349-w
work_keys_str_mv AT balafarmoloud evaluationthequalityofbagmaskventilationbyecteandhooktechniqueanewproposedtechnique
AT pouraghaeimahboub evaluationthequalityofbagmaskventilationbyecteandhooktechniqueanewproposedtechnique
AT paknezhadseyedpouya evaluationthequalityofbagmaskventilationbyecteandhooktechniqueanewproposedtechnique
AT abadsabanematiahmad evaluationthequalityofbagmaskventilationbyecteandhooktechniqueanewproposedtechnique
AT soleimanpourhassan evaluationthequalityofbagmaskventilationbyecteandhooktechniqueanewproposedtechnique