Cargando…

Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent in more than half of residents of nursing and residential care homes and can have a detrimental impact on dignity and quality of life. Care homes predominantly use absorbent pads to contain UI rather than actively treat the condition. Transcutaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fenocchi, Linda, Mason, Helen, Macaulay, Lisa, O’Dolan, Catriona, Treweek, Shaun, Booth, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04459-z
_version_ 1785148928963903488
author Fenocchi, Linda
Mason, Helen
Macaulay, Lisa
O’Dolan, Catriona
Treweek, Shaun
Booth, Joanne
author_facet Fenocchi, Linda
Mason, Helen
Macaulay, Lisa
O’Dolan, Catriona
Treweek, Shaun
Booth, Joanne
author_sort Fenocchi, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent in more than half of residents of nursing and residential care homes and can have a detrimental impact on dignity and quality of life. Care homes predominantly use absorbent pads to contain UI rather than actively treat the condition. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a non-invasive, safe, low-cost intervention with demonstrated effectiveness for reducing UI in adults. We examined the costs and consequences of delivering TTNS to care home residents in comparison to sham (inactive) electrical stimulation. METHODS: A cost consequence analysis approach was used to assemble and present the resource use and outcome data for the ELECTRIC trial which randomised 406 residents with UI from 37 care homes in the United Kingdom to receive 12 sessions of 30 min of either TTNS or sham (inactive) TTNS. TTNS was administered by care home staff over 6 weeks. Health state utility was measured using DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-PROXY-U at baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks follow-up. Staff completed a resource use questionnaire at baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks follow-up, which also assessed use of absorbent pads. RESULTS: HRQoL did not change significantly in either randomised group. Delivery of TTNS was estimated to cost £81.20 per participant, plus training and support costs of £121.03 per staff member. 85% of participants needed toilet assistance as routine, on average requiring one or two staff members to be involved 4 or 5 times in each 24 h. Daily use of mobility aids and other assistive devices to use the toilet were reported. The value of staff time to assist residents to use the toilet (assuming an average of 5 min per resident per visit) was estimated as £19.17 (SD 13.22) for TTNS and £17.30 (SD 13.33) for sham (per resident in a 24-hour period). CONCLUSIONS: Use of TTNS to treat UI in care home residents did not lead to changes in resource use, particularly any reduction in the use of absorbent pads and no cost benefits for TTNS were shown. Managing continence in care homes is labour intensive, requiring both high levels of staff time and use of equipment aids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98415244, registered 25/04/2018. NCT03248362 (Clinical trial.gov number), registered 14/08//2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04459-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106663452023-11-22 Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial Fenocchi, Linda Mason, Helen Macaulay, Lisa O’Dolan, Catriona Treweek, Shaun Booth, Joanne BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent in more than half of residents of nursing and residential care homes and can have a detrimental impact on dignity and quality of life. Care homes predominantly use absorbent pads to contain UI rather than actively treat the condition. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a non-invasive, safe, low-cost intervention with demonstrated effectiveness for reducing UI in adults. We examined the costs and consequences of delivering TTNS to care home residents in comparison to sham (inactive) electrical stimulation. METHODS: A cost consequence analysis approach was used to assemble and present the resource use and outcome data for the ELECTRIC trial which randomised 406 residents with UI from 37 care homes in the United Kingdom to receive 12 sessions of 30 min of either TTNS or sham (inactive) TTNS. TTNS was administered by care home staff over 6 weeks. Health state utility was measured using DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-PROXY-U at baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks follow-up. Staff completed a resource use questionnaire at baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks follow-up, which also assessed use of absorbent pads. RESULTS: HRQoL did not change significantly in either randomised group. Delivery of TTNS was estimated to cost £81.20 per participant, plus training and support costs of £121.03 per staff member. 85% of participants needed toilet assistance as routine, on average requiring one or two staff members to be involved 4 or 5 times in each 24 h. Daily use of mobility aids and other assistive devices to use the toilet were reported. The value of staff time to assist residents to use the toilet (assuming an average of 5 min per resident per visit) was estimated as £19.17 (SD 13.22) for TTNS and £17.30 (SD 13.33) for sham (per resident in a 24-hour period). CONCLUSIONS: Use of TTNS to treat UI in care home residents did not lead to changes in resource use, particularly any reduction in the use of absorbent pads and no cost benefits for TTNS were shown. Managing continence in care homes is labour intensive, requiring both high levels of staff time and use of equipment aids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98415244, registered 25/04/2018. NCT03248362 (Clinical trial.gov number), registered 14/08//2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04459-z. BioMed Central 2023-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10666345/ /pubmed/37993786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04459-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fenocchi, Linda
Mason, Helen
Macaulay, Lisa
O’Dolan, Catriona
Treweek, Shaun
Booth, Joanne
Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
title Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost consequence analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (ttns) for urinary incontinence in care home residents alongside a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04459-z
work_keys_str_mv AT fenocchilinda costconsequenceanalysisoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsforurinaryincontinenceincarehomeresidentsalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT masonhelen costconsequenceanalysisoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsforurinaryincontinenceincarehomeresidentsalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macaulaylisa costconsequenceanalysisoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsforurinaryincontinenceincarehomeresidentsalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT odolancatriona costconsequenceanalysisoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsforurinaryincontinenceincarehomeresidentsalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT treweekshaun costconsequenceanalysisoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsforurinaryincontinenceincarehomeresidentsalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boothjoanne costconsequenceanalysisoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsforurinaryincontinenceincarehomeresidentsalongsidearandomisedcontrolledtrial