Cargando…

Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis (HD) experience considerable symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is limited use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in facility HD units to direct immediate care, with response rates in other studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Neeru, Shah, Karan K., Dansie, Kathryn, Bennett, Paul N., Greenham, Lavern, Brown, Chris, Smyth, Brendan, McDonald, Stephen, Jesudason, Shilpanjali, Viecelli, Andrea K., Morton, Rachael L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03399-5
_version_ 1785148935279476736
author Agarwal, Neeru
Shah, Karan K.
Dansie, Kathryn
Bennett, Paul N.
Greenham, Lavern
Brown, Chris
Smyth, Brendan
McDonald, Stephen
Jesudason, Shilpanjali
Viecelli, Andrea K.
Morton, Rachael L.
author_facet Agarwal, Neeru
Shah, Karan K.
Dansie, Kathryn
Bennett, Paul N.
Greenham, Lavern
Brown, Chris
Smyth, Brendan
McDonald, Stephen
Jesudason, Shilpanjali
Viecelli, Andrea K.
Morton, Rachael L.
author_sort Agarwal, Neeru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis (HD) experience considerable symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is limited use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in facility HD units to direct immediate care, with response rates in other studies between 36 to 70%. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate feasibility of electronic PROMs (e-PROMs) in HD participants, with feedback 3-monthly to the participants’ treating team, for severe or worsening symptoms as identified by the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS-Renal), with linkage to the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry, compared with usual care. METHODS: This is a registry-based cluster-randomized controlled pilot trial involving all adults receiving HD in 4 satellite units in Australia over a 6-month period. HD units were cluster randomized 1:1 to the control (HRQoL data collection only) or intervention arm (symptom monitoring with feedback to treating team every 3 months). Feasibility was assessed by participant response rate (percentage of eligible HD participants, including new incident participants, who completed the questionnaire at each time point); retention rate (percentage of participants who completed the baseline questionnaire and all subsequent measures); and completion time. HRQoL and symptom burden scores are described. RESULTS: There were 226 unique participants who completed the e-PROMs (mean age 62 years, 69% males, 78% White-European, median dialysis vintage 1.62 years). At 6 months, response rate and retention rate for the intervention arm were 54% and 68%, respectively, and 89% and 97% in the control arm. Median time to complete IPOS-Renal was 6.6 min (5.3, 10.1) at 3 months, and when combined with the outcome measure (EQ-5D-5L), the median time was 9.4 min (6.9, 13.6) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic symptom monitoring among HD participants with feedback to clinicians is feasible. Variations in response and retention rates could be potentially explained by the lengthier questionnaire, and higher frequency of data collection time points for participants in the intervention arm. A definitive national RCT is underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618001976279 (07/12/2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-023-03399-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106663722023-11-22 Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial Agarwal, Neeru Shah, Karan K. Dansie, Kathryn Bennett, Paul N. Greenham, Lavern Brown, Chris Smyth, Brendan McDonald, Stephen Jesudason, Shilpanjali Viecelli, Andrea K. Morton, Rachael L. BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis (HD) experience considerable symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is limited use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in facility HD units to direct immediate care, with response rates in other studies between 36 to 70%. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate feasibility of electronic PROMs (e-PROMs) in HD participants, with feedback 3-monthly to the participants’ treating team, for severe or worsening symptoms as identified by the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS-Renal), with linkage to the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry, compared with usual care. METHODS: This is a registry-based cluster-randomized controlled pilot trial involving all adults receiving HD in 4 satellite units in Australia over a 6-month period. HD units were cluster randomized 1:1 to the control (HRQoL data collection only) or intervention arm (symptom monitoring with feedback to treating team every 3 months). Feasibility was assessed by participant response rate (percentage of eligible HD participants, including new incident participants, who completed the questionnaire at each time point); retention rate (percentage of participants who completed the baseline questionnaire and all subsequent measures); and completion time. HRQoL and symptom burden scores are described. RESULTS: There were 226 unique participants who completed the e-PROMs (mean age 62 years, 69% males, 78% White-European, median dialysis vintage 1.62 years). At 6 months, response rate and retention rate for the intervention arm were 54% and 68%, respectively, and 89% and 97% in the control arm. Median time to complete IPOS-Renal was 6.6 min (5.3, 10.1) at 3 months, and when combined with the outcome measure (EQ-5D-5L), the median time was 9.4 min (6.9, 13.6) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic symptom monitoring among HD participants with feedback to clinicians is feasible. Variations in response and retention rates could be potentially explained by the lengthier questionnaire, and higher frequency of data collection time points for participants in the intervention arm. A definitive national RCT is underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618001976279 (07/12/2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-023-03399-5. BioMed Central 2023-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10666372/ /pubmed/37993776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03399-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Agarwal, Neeru
Shah, Karan K.
Dansie, Kathryn
Bennett, Paul N.
Greenham, Lavern
Brown, Chris
Smyth, Brendan
McDonald, Stephen
Jesudason, Shilpanjali
Viecelli, Andrea K.
Morton, Rachael L.
Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
title Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
title_full Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
title_fullStr Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
title_short Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
title_sort feasibility of symptom monitoring with feedback trial (swift) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03399-5
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalneeru feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT shahkarank feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT dansiekathryn feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT bennettpauln feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT greenhamlavern feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT brownchris feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT smythbrendan feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT mcdonaldstephen feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT jesudasonshilpanjali feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT viecelliandreak feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT mortonrachaell feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial
AT feasibilityofsymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftforadultsonhemodialysisaregistrybasedclusterrandomizedpilottrial