Cargando…
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to oral anticoagulant medications. However, these procedures carry certain risks of peri-procedural complications. One such complication is silent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07766-3 |
_version_ | 1785148946237095936 |
---|---|
author | Streb, Witold Lasek-Bal, Anetta Mitręga, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Podolecki, Tomasz Kowalska, Wiktoria Olma, Anna Sobczyk, Agata Kalarus, Zbigniew |
author_facet | Streb, Witold Lasek-Bal, Anetta Mitręga, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Podolecki, Tomasz Kowalska, Wiktoria Olma, Anna Sobczyk, Agata Kalarus, Zbigniew |
author_sort | Streb, Witold |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to oral anticoagulant medications. However, these procedures carry certain risks of peri-procedural complications. One such complication is silent brain infarcts (SBI), which can lead to cognitive impairment and mood disturbances. The implementation of mechanical neuroprotection systems during LAAC procedures may reduce the risk of SBI and associated cognitive and mood disorders. METHODS: The LAAC-SBI trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind interventional study. The study aims to enroll a total of 240 patients, with 120 patients allocated to each group. The study group will evaluate the use of the Sentinel CPS during LAAC, while the control group will undergo LAAC procedures without the Sentinel CPS. The primary endpoint of the study is the number of new SBIs or stroke foci detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI). Secondary endpoints include deterioration of cognitive function, development of dementia syndrome, and occurrence of depressive disorders. These endpoints will be assessed using questionnaire tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The observational period for patients in the study is 2 years. DISCUSSION: If the study demonstrates a favorable outcome with reduced incidence of SBI and improved cognitive and mood outcomes in patients receiving cerebral protection devices during LAAC, it will have significant implications for clinical management standards. This would support the use of neuroprotection devices not only for LAAC but also in procedures such as atrial fibrillation ablation or transcatheter mitral valve interventions, where the risk of embolic events and subsequent brain injury may also be present. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05369195. Registration on 11.05.2022. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10666419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106664192023-11-23 Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial Streb, Witold Lasek-Bal, Anetta Mitręga, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Podolecki, Tomasz Kowalska, Wiktoria Olma, Anna Sobczyk, Agata Kalarus, Zbigniew Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to oral anticoagulant medications. However, these procedures carry certain risks of peri-procedural complications. One such complication is silent brain infarcts (SBI), which can lead to cognitive impairment and mood disturbances. The implementation of mechanical neuroprotection systems during LAAC procedures may reduce the risk of SBI and associated cognitive and mood disorders. METHODS: The LAAC-SBI trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind interventional study. The study aims to enroll a total of 240 patients, with 120 patients allocated to each group. The study group will evaluate the use of the Sentinel CPS during LAAC, while the control group will undergo LAAC procedures without the Sentinel CPS. The primary endpoint of the study is the number of new SBIs or stroke foci detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI). Secondary endpoints include deterioration of cognitive function, development of dementia syndrome, and occurrence of depressive disorders. These endpoints will be assessed using questionnaire tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The observational period for patients in the study is 2 years. DISCUSSION: If the study demonstrates a favorable outcome with reduced incidence of SBI and improved cognitive and mood outcomes in patients receiving cerebral protection devices during LAAC, it will have significant implications for clinical management standards. This would support the use of neuroprotection devices not only for LAAC but also in procedures such as atrial fibrillation ablation or transcatheter mitral valve interventions, where the risk of embolic events and subsequent brain injury may also be present. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05369195. Registration on 11.05.2022. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10666419/ /pubmed/37996955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07766-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Streb, Witold Lasek-Bal, Anetta Mitręga, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Jacek Podolecki, Tomasz Kowalska, Wiktoria Olma, Anna Sobczyk, Agata Kalarus, Zbigniew Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial |
title | Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial |
title_full | Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial |
title_short | Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial |
title_sort | rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a laac-sbi trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07766-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strebwitold rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT lasekbalanetta rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT mitregakatarzyna rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT kowalczykjacek rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT podoleckitomasz rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT kowalskawiktoria rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT olmaanna rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT sobczykagata rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial AT kalaruszbigniew rationaleanddesignofarandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyofmechanicalneuroprotectioninreducingtheriskofsilentbraininfarctsassociatedwithpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosurestudyprotocolforalaacsbitrial |