Cargando…

Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet

A study to compare the rumen microbial community composition, functional potential of the microbiota, methane (CH(4)) yield, and rumen fermentation was conducted in adult male cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. A total of 41 phyla, 169 orders, 374 families, and 1,376 microbial genera were id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Pradeep K., Trivedi, Shraddha, Kolte, Atul P., Mohapatra, Archit, Biswas, Siddharth, Bhattar, Ashwin V. K., Bhatta, Raghavendra, Rahman, Habibar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1266025
_version_ 1785139089813536768
author Malik, Pradeep K.
Trivedi, Shraddha
Kolte, Atul P.
Mohapatra, Archit
Biswas, Siddharth
Bhattar, Ashwin V. K.
Bhatta, Raghavendra
Rahman, Habibar
author_facet Malik, Pradeep K.
Trivedi, Shraddha
Kolte, Atul P.
Mohapatra, Archit
Biswas, Siddharth
Bhattar, Ashwin V. K.
Bhatta, Raghavendra
Rahman, Habibar
author_sort Malik, Pradeep K.
collection PubMed
description A study to compare the rumen microbial community composition, functional potential of the microbiota, methane (CH(4)) yield, and rumen fermentation was conducted in adult male cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. A total of 41 phyla, 169 orders, 374 families, and 1,376 microbial genera were identified in the study. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the two most dominant bacterial phyla in both cattle and buffaloes. However, there was no difference in the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in the rumen metagenome of cattle and buffaloes. Based on the abundance, the Proteobacteria was the 3rd largest phylum in the metagenome, constituting 18–20% in both host species. Euryarchaeota was the most abundant phylum of the methanogens, whereas Methanobacteriales and Methanobrevibacter were the most abundant orders and genera in both species. The methanogen abundances were not different between the two host species. Like the metagenome, the difference between the compositional and functional abundances (metagenome vs. metatranscriptome) of the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was not significant, whereas the proteobacteria were functionally less active than their metagenomic composition. Contrary to the metagenome, the Euryarchaeota was the 3rd most functional phylum in the rumen and constituted ~15% of the metatranscriptome. Methanobacteriales were the most functional methanogens, accounting for more than 2/3rd of the total archaeal functionality. These results indicated that the methanogens from Euryarchaeota were functionally more active as compared to their compositional abundance. The CH(4) yield (g/kg DMI), CH(4) emission (g/kg DDM), dry matter (DM) intake, and rumen fermentation did not vary between the two host species. Overall, the study established a substantial difference between the compositional abundances and metabolic functionality of the rumen microbiota; however, feeding cattle and buffaloes on the same diet resulted in similar microbiota composition, metabolic functionality, and CH(4) yield. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effect of different diets and environments on the composition and metabolic functionality of the rumen microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106666472023-11-09 Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet Malik, Pradeep K. Trivedi, Shraddha Kolte, Atul P. Mohapatra, Archit Biswas, Siddharth Bhattar, Ashwin V. K. Bhatta, Raghavendra Rahman, Habibar Front Microbiol Microbiology A study to compare the rumen microbial community composition, functional potential of the microbiota, methane (CH(4)) yield, and rumen fermentation was conducted in adult male cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. A total of 41 phyla, 169 orders, 374 families, and 1,376 microbial genera were identified in the study. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the two most dominant bacterial phyla in both cattle and buffaloes. However, there was no difference in the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in the rumen metagenome of cattle and buffaloes. Based on the abundance, the Proteobacteria was the 3rd largest phylum in the metagenome, constituting 18–20% in both host species. Euryarchaeota was the most abundant phylum of the methanogens, whereas Methanobacteriales and Methanobrevibacter were the most abundant orders and genera in both species. The methanogen abundances were not different between the two host species. Like the metagenome, the difference between the compositional and functional abundances (metagenome vs. metatranscriptome) of the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was not significant, whereas the proteobacteria were functionally less active than their metagenomic composition. Contrary to the metagenome, the Euryarchaeota was the 3rd most functional phylum in the rumen and constituted ~15% of the metatranscriptome. Methanobacteriales were the most functional methanogens, accounting for more than 2/3rd of the total archaeal functionality. These results indicated that the methanogens from Euryarchaeota were functionally more active as compared to their compositional abundance. The CH(4) yield (g/kg DMI), CH(4) emission (g/kg DDM), dry matter (DM) intake, and rumen fermentation did not vary between the two host species. Overall, the study established a substantial difference between the compositional abundances and metabolic functionality of the rumen microbiota; however, feeding cattle and buffaloes on the same diet resulted in similar microbiota composition, metabolic functionality, and CH(4) yield. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effect of different diets and environments on the composition and metabolic functionality of the rumen microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10666647/ /pubmed/38029196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1266025 Text en Copyright © 2023 Malik, Trivedi, Kolte, Mohapatra, Biswas, Bhattar, Bhatta and Rahman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Malik, Pradeep K.
Trivedi, Shraddha
Kolte, Atul P.
Mohapatra, Archit
Biswas, Siddharth
Bhattar, Ashwin V. K.
Bhatta, Raghavendra
Rahman, Habibar
Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
title Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
title_full Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
title_short Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
title_sort comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1266025
work_keys_str_mv AT malikpradeepk comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT trivedishraddha comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT kolteatulp comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT mohapatraarchit comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT biswassiddharth comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT bhattarashwinvk comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT bhattaraghavendra comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet
AT rahmanhabibar comparativeanalysisofrumenmetagenomemetatranscriptomefermentationandmethaneyieldincattleandbuffaloesfedonthesamediet