Cargando…
Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
Preference for noise reduction (NR) strength differs between individuals. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate whether hearing loss influences this preference, (2) to find the number of distinct settings required to classify participants in similar groups based on their preference for NR...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231211437 |
_version_ | 1785148992511803392 |
---|---|
author | Houben, Rolph Reinten, Ilja Dreschler, Wouter A. Mathijssen, Roland Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H. |
author_facet | Houben, Rolph Reinten, Ilja Dreschler, Wouter A. Mathijssen, Roland Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H. |
author_sort | Houben, Rolph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preference for noise reduction (NR) strength differs between individuals. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate whether hearing loss influences this preference, (2) to find the number of distinct settings required to classify participants in similar groups based on their preference for NR strength, and (3) to estimate the number of paired comparisons needed to predict to which preference group a participant belongs. A paired comparison paradigm was used in which participants listened to pairs of speech-in-noise stimuli processed by NR with 10 different strength settings. Participants indicated their preferred sound sample. The 30 participants were divided into three groups according to hearing status (normal hearing, mild hearing loss, and moderate hearing loss). The results showed that (1) participants with moderate hearing loss preferred stronger NR than participants with normal hearing; (2) cluster analysis based solely on the preference for NR strength showed that the data could be described well by dividing the participants into three preference clusters; (3) the appropriate cluster membership could be found with 15 paired comparisons. We conclude that on average, a higher hearing loss is related to a preference for stronger NR, at least for our NR algorithm and our participants. The results show that it might be possible to use a limited set of pre-set NR strengths that can be chosen clinically. For our NR one might use three settings: no NR, intermediate NR, and strong NR. Paired comparisons might be used to find the optimal one of the three settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10666719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106667192023-11-21 Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Houben, Rolph Reinten, Ilja Dreschler, Wouter A. Mathijssen, Roland Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H. Trends Hear Original Article Preference for noise reduction (NR) strength differs between individuals. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate whether hearing loss influences this preference, (2) to find the number of distinct settings required to classify participants in similar groups based on their preference for NR strength, and (3) to estimate the number of paired comparisons needed to predict to which preference group a participant belongs. A paired comparison paradigm was used in which participants listened to pairs of speech-in-noise stimuli processed by NR with 10 different strength settings. Participants indicated their preferred sound sample. The 30 participants were divided into three groups according to hearing status (normal hearing, mild hearing loss, and moderate hearing loss). The results showed that (1) participants with moderate hearing loss preferred stronger NR than participants with normal hearing; (2) cluster analysis based solely on the preference for NR strength showed that the data could be described well by dividing the participants into three preference clusters; (3) the appropriate cluster membership could be found with 15 paired comparisons. We conclude that on average, a higher hearing loss is related to a preference for stronger NR, at least for our NR algorithm and our participants. The results show that it might be possible to use a limited set of pre-set NR strengths that can be chosen clinically. For our NR one might use three settings: no NR, intermediate NR, and strong NR. Paired comparisons might be used to find the optimal one of the three settings. SAGE Publications 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10666719/ /pubmed/37990543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231211437 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Houben, Rolph Reinten, Ilja Dreschler, Wouter A. Mathijssen, Roland Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H. Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners |
title | Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners |
title_full | Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners |
title_fullStr | Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners |
title_short | Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners |
title_sort | preferred strength of noise reduction for normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231211437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houbenrolph preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners AT reintenilja preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners AT dreschlerwoutera preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners AT mathijssenroland preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners AT dijkstratjeerdmh preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners |