Cargando…

Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Preference for noise reduction (NR) strength differs between individuals. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate whether hearing loss influences this preference, (2) to find the number of distinct settings required to classify participants in similar groups based on their preference for NR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houben, Rolph, Reinten, Ilja, Dreschler, Wouter A., Mathijssen, Roland, Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231211437
_version_ 1785148992511803392
author Houben, Rolph
Reinten, Ilja
Dreschler, Wouter A.
Mathijssen, Roland
Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H.
author_facet Houben, Rolph
Reinten, Ilja
Dreschler, Wouter A.
Mathijssen, Roland
Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H.
author_sort Houben, Rolph
collection PubMed
description Preference for noise reduction (NR) strength differs between individuals. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate whether hearing loss influences this preference, (2) to find the number of distinct settings required to classify participants in similar groups based on their preference for NR strength, and (3) to estimate the number of paired comparisons needed to predict to which preference group a participant belongs. A paired comparison paradigm was used in which participants listened to pairs of speech-in-noise stimuli processed by NR with 10 different strength settings. Participants indicated their preferred sound sample. The 30 participants were divided into three groups according to hearing status (normal hearing, mild hearing loss, and moderate hearing loss). The results showed that (1) participants with moderate hearing loss preferred stronger NR than participants with normal hearing; (2) cluster analysis based solely on the preference for NR strength showed that the data could be described well by dividing the participants into three preference clusters; (3) the appropriate cluster membership could be found with 15 paired comparisons. We conclude that on average, a higher hearing loss is related to a preference for stronger NR, at least for our NR algorithm and our participants. The results show that it might be possible to use a limited set of pre-set NR strengths that can be chosen clinically. For our NR one might use three settings: no NR, intermediate NR, and strong NR. Paired comparisons might be used to find the optimal one of the three settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106667192023-11-21 Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Houben, Rolph Reinten, Ilja Dreschler, Wouter A. Mathijssen, Roland Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H. Trends Hear Original Article Preference for noise reduction (NR) strength differs between individuals. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate whether hearing loss influences this preference, (2) to find the number of distinct settings required to classify participants in similar groups based on their preference for NR strength, and (3) to estimate the number of paired comparisons needed to predict to which preference group a participant belongs. A paired comparison paradigm was used in which participants listened to pairs of speech-in-noise stimuli processed by NR with 10 different strength settings. Participants indicated their preferred sound sample. The 30 participants were divided into three groups according to hearing status (normal hearing, mild hearing loss, and moderate hearing loss). The results showed that (1) participants with moderate hearing loss preferred stronger NR than participants with normal hearing; (2) cluster analysis based solely on the preference for NR strength showed that the data could be described well by dividing the participants into three preference clusters; (3) the appropriate cluster membership could be found with 15 paired comparisons. We conclude that on average, a higher hearing loss is related to a preference for stronger NR, at least for our NR algorithm and our participants. The results show that it might be possible to use a limited set of pre-set NR strengths that can be chosen clinically. For our NR one might use three settings: no NR, intermediate NR, and strong NR. Paired comparisons might be used to find the optimal one of the three settings. SAGE Publications 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10666719/ /pubmed/37990543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231211437 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Houben, Rolph
Reinten, Ilja
Dreschler, Wouter A.
Mathijssen, Roland
Dijkstra, Tjeerd M. H.
Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
title Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
title_full Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
title_fullStr Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
title_full_unstemmed Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
title_short Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
title_sort preferred strength of noise reduction for normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165231211437
work_keys_str_mv AT houbenrolph preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners
AT reintenilja preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners
AT dreschlerwoutera preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners
AT mathijssenroland preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners
AT dijkstratjeerdmh preferredstrengthofnoisereductionfornormallyhearingandhearingimpairedlisteners