Cargando…

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Its Correlation With Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Function and Geometry in Hypertensive Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background It is important to consider left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in assessing hypertensive patients’ global cardiovascular risk profile, as LVH and arterial wall changes occur concurrently. This study aimed to assess the relationship between CIMT an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inuwa, Mariam, Ajuluchukwu, Janet N, Olusegun-Joseph, Akinsanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021707
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47589
Descripción
Sumario:Background It is important to consider left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in assessing hypertensive patients’ global cardiovascular risk profile, as LVH and arterial wall changes occur concurrently. This study aimed to assess the relationship between CIMT and left ventricular geometry and function in hypertensive patients. Methodology This cross-sectional study included 200 hypertensive individuals and sought to correlate their CIMT with left ventricular geometry and function in Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or on treatment for hypertension presenting at the outpatient clinics. Patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited. Abnormal CIMT was defined as >0.9 mm. Patients’ demographic data were obtained in addition to general characteristics, physical examination, transthoracic echocardiography, and CIMT. The statistical relationship between CIMT and left ventricular geometry and function was obtained and analyzed. Results Normal geometry and LVH were observed in 50.5% and 15.5%, respectively. Left ventricular geometry was associated with abnormal CIMT (χ(2) = 31.688, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean left ventricular mass index was statistically different between abnormal and normal CIMT (97.84 ± 30.5 vs. 80.75 ± 15.6; p < 0.001). Regarding left ventricular function, there was no significant difference in E-point septal separation, left ventricular fractional shortening, and left ventricular ejection fraction in abnormal versus normal CIMT groups. However, there was a significant association of CIMT with grades of diastolic dysfunction (χ(2) = 7.069, p = 0.029). Additionally, individual parameters of diastolic dysfunction such as left atrial volume index and septal mitral were significantly different (p < 0.001). Conclusions There was an association between age, left ventricular geometry, diastolic function, and CIMT in hypertensive individuals. Therefore, it is beneficial to evaluate CIMT and for these patients to receive more targeted blood pressure control which may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases.