Cargando…
Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe physicians’ perspectives on the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with sepsis. METHODS: In January 2022, physicians of a large European university medical center were surveyed using a web-based questionnaire asking about their views on the role of CT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3 |
_version_ | 1785139188725710848 |
---|---|
author | Opper Hernando, Maria Isabel Witham, Denis Steinhagen, Peter Richard Angermair, Stefan Bauer, Wolfgang Compton, Friederike Edel, Andreas Kruse, Jan Kühnle, York Lachmann, Gunnar Marz, Susanne Müller-Redetzky, Holger Nee, Jens Paul, Oliver Praeger, Damaris Skurk, Carsten Stegemann, Miriam Uhrig, Alexander Wolf, Stefan Zimmermann, Elke Rubarth, Kerstin Bolanaki, Myrto Seybold, Joachim Dewey, Marc Pohlan, Julian |
author_facet | Opper Hernando, Maria Isabel Witham, Denis Steinhagen, Peter Richard Angermair, Stefan Bauer, Wolfgang Compton, Friederike Edel, Andreas Kruse, Jan Kühnle, York Lachmann, Gunnar Marz, Susanne Müller-Redetzky, Holger Nee, Jens Paul, Oliver Praeger, Damaris Skurk, Carsten Stegemann, Miriam Uhrig, Alexander Wolf, Stefan Zimmermann, Elke Rubarth, Kerstin Bolanaki, Myrto Seybold, Joachim Dewey, Marc Pohlan, Julian |
author_sort | Opper Hernando, Maria Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe physicians’ perspectives on the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with sepsis. METHODS: In January 2022, physicians of a large European university medical center were surveyed using a web-based questionnaire asking about their views on the role of CT in sepsis. A total of 371 questionnaires met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using work experience, workplace, and medical specialty of physicians as variables. Chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: Physicians considered the ability to detect an unknown focus as the greatest benefit of CT scans in sepsis (70.9%, n = 263/371). Two clinical criteria — “signs of decreased vigilance” (89.2%, n = 331/371) and “increased catecholamine demand” (84.7%, n = 314/371) — were considered highly relevant for a CT request. Elevated procalcitonin (82.7%, n = 307/371) and lactate levels (83.6%, n = 310/371) were consistently found to be critical laboratory values to request a CT. As long as there is evidence of infection in one organ region, most physicians (42.6%, n = 158/371) would order a CT scan based on clinical assessment. Combined examination of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was favored (34.8%, n = 129/371) in cases without clinical clues of an infection source. A time window of ≥ 1–6 h was preferred for both CT examinations (53.9%, n = 200/371) and CT-guided interventions (59.3%, n = 220/371) in patients with sepsis. CONCLUSION: Despite much consensus, there are significant differences in attitudes towards the use of CT in septic patients among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. Knowledge of these perspectives may improve patient management and interprofessional communication. KEY POINTS: Despite interdisciplinary consensus on the use of CT in sepsis, statistically significant differences in the responses are apparent among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. The detection of a previously unknown source of infection and the ability to plan interventions and/or surgery based on CT findings are considered key advantages of CT in septic patients. Timing of CT reflects the requirements of specific disciplines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10667150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106671502023-07-14 Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center Opper Hernando, Maria Isabel Witham, Denis Steinhagen, Peter Richard Angermair, Stefan Bauer, Wolfgang Compton, Friederike Edel, Andreas Kruse, Jan Kühnle, York Lachmann, Gunnar Marz, Susanne Müller-Redetzky, Holger Nee, Jens Paul, Oliver Praeger, Damaris Skurk, Carsten Stegemann, Miriam Uhrig, Alexander Wolf, Stefan Zimmermann, Elke Rubarth, Kerstin Bolanaki, Myrto Seybold, Joachim Dewey, Marc Pohlan, Julian Eur Radiol Computer Tomography OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe physicians’ perspectives on the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with sepsis. METHODS: In January 2022, physicians of a large European university medical center were surveyed using a web-based questionnaire asking about their views on the role of CT in sepsis. A total of 371 questionnaires met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using work experience, workplace, and medical specialty of physicians as variables. Chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: Physicians considered the ability to detect an unknown focus as the greatest benefit of CT scans in sepsis (70.9%, n = 263/371). Two clinical criteria — “signs of decreased vigilance” (89.2%, n = 331/371) and “increased catecholamine demand” (84.7%, n = 314/371) — were considered highly relevant for a CT request. Elevated procalcitonin (82.7%, n = 307/371) and lactate levels (83.6%, n = 310/371) were consistently found to be critical laboratory values to request a CT. As long as there is evidence of infection in one organ region, most physicians (42.6%, n = 158/371) would order a CT scan based on clinical assessment. Combined examination of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was favored (34.8%, n = 129/371) in cases without clinical clues of an infection source. A time window of ≥ 1–6 h was preferred for both CT examinations (53.9%, n = 200/371) and CT-guided interventions (59.3%, n = 220/371) in patients with sepsis. CONCLUSION: Despite much consensus, there are significant differences in attitudes towards the use of CT in septic patients among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. Knowledge of these perspectives may improve patient management and interprofessional communication. KEY POINTS: Despite interdisciplinary consensus on the use of CT in sepsis, statistically significant differences in the responses are apparent among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. The detection of a previously unknown source of infection and the ability to plan interventions and/or surgery based on CT findings are considered key advantages of CT in septic patients. Timing of CT reflects the requirements of specific disciplines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10667150/ /pubmed/37450054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Computer Tomography Opper Hernando, Maria Isabel Witham, Denis Steinhagen, Peter Richard Angermair, Stefan Bauer, Wolfgang Compton, Friederike Edel, Andreas Kruse, Jan Kühnle, York Lachmann, Gunnar Marz, Susanne Müller-Redetzky, Holger Nee, Jens Paul, Oliver Praeger, Damaris Skurk, Carsten Stegemann, Miriam Uhrig, Alexander Wolf, Stefan Zimmermann, Elke Rubarth, Kerstin Bolanaki, Myrto Seybold, Joachim Dewey, Marc Pohlan, Julian Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
title | Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
title_full | Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
title_fullStr | Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
title_full_unstemmed | Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
title_short | Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
title_sort | interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center |
topic | Computer Tomography |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opperhernandomariaisabel interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT withamdenis interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT steinhagenpeterrichard interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT angermairstefan interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT bauerwolfgang interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT comptonfriederike interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT edelandreas interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT krusejan interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT kuhnleyork interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT lachmanngunnar interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT marzsusanne interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT mullerredetzkyholger interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT neejens interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT pauloliver interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT praegerdamaris interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT skurkcarsten interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT stegemannmiriam interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT uhrigalexander interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT wolfstefan interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT zimmermannelke interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT rubarthkerstin interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT bolanakimyrto interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT seyboldjoachim interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT deweymarc interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter AT pohlanjulian interdisciplinaryperspectivesoncomputedtomographyinsepsissurveyamongmedicaldoctorsatalargeuniversitymedicalcenter |