Cargando…
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed at assessing whether HFNC is associated with reduced risk of intubation or mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37994981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8 |
_version_ | 1785149016423530496 |
---|---|
author | Le Pape, Sylvain Savart, Sigourney Arrivé, François Frat, Jean-Pierre Ragot, Stéphanie Coudroy, Rémi Thille, Arnaud W. |
author_facet | Le Pape, Sylvain Savart, Sigourney Arrivé, François Frat, Jean-Pierre Ragot, Stéphanie Coudroy, Rémi Thille, Arnaud W. |
author_sort | Le Pape, Sylvain |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed at assessing whether HFNC is associated with reduced risk of intubation or mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing HFNC vs. COT in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, published in English from inception to December 2022. Pediatric studies, studies that compared HFNC with a noninvasive respiratory support other than COT and those in which intubation or mortality were not reported were excluded. Two authors independently screened and selected articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis were performed according to statistical heterogeneity. Primary outcomes were risk of intubation and mortality across RCTs. Effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (RR; 95% CI). Observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Twenty studies were analyzed, accounting for 8383 patients, including 6 RCTs (2509 patients) and 14 observational studies (5874 patients). By pooling the 6 RCTs, HFNC compared with COT significantly reduced the risk of intubation (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98; p = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in hospital. HFNC did not significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11; p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, HFNC reduced the need for intubation and shortened length of stay in hospital without significant decreased risk of mortality. Trial registration The study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ with the trial registration number CRD42022340035 (06/20/2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10667189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106671892023-11-23 High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis Le Pape, Sylvain Savart, Sigourney Arrivé, François Frat, Jean-Pierre Ragot, Stéphanie Coudroy, Rémi Thille, Arnaud W. Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed at assessing whether HFNC is associated with reduced risk of intubation or mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing HFNC vs. COT in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, published in English from inception to December 2022. Pediatric studies, studies that compared HFNC with a noninvasive respiratory support other than COT and those in which intubation or mortality were not reported were excluded. Two authors independently screened and selected articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis were performed according to statistical heterogeneity. Primary outcomes were risk of intubation and mortality across RCTs. Effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (RR; 95% CI). Observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Twenty studies were analyzed, accounting for 8383 patients, including 6 RCTs (2509 patients) and 14 observational studies (5874 patients). By pooling the 6 RCTs, HFNC compared with COT significantly reduced the risk of intubation (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98; p = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in hospital. HFNC did not significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11; p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, HFNC reduced the need for intubation and shortened length of stay in hospital without significant decreased risk of mortality. Trial registration The study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ with the trial registration number CRD42022340035 (06/20/2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8. Springer International Publishing 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10667189/ /pubmed/37994981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Le Pape, Sylvain Savart, Sigourney Arrivé, François Frat, Jean-Pierre Ragot, Stéphanie Coudroy, Rémi Thille, Arnaud W. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | high-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37994981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lepapesylvain highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT savartsigourney highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arrivefrancois highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fratjeanpierre highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ragotstephanie highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT coudroyremi highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT thillearnaudw highflownasalcannulaoxygenversusconventionaloxygentherapyforacuterespiratoryfailureduetocovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |