Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale of Administrator Nurses (SEPSAN) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity among nurse managers. METHODS: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Taotao, Chen, Yang, Song, Caini, Li, Chaoqun, Liu, Jia, Huang, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Nursing Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.015
_version_ 1785139218402508800
author He, Taotao
Chen, Yang
Song, Caini
Li, Chaoqun
Liu, Jia
Huang, Jing
author_facet He, Taotao
Chen, Yang
Song, Caini
Li, Chaoqun
Liu, Jia
Huang, Jing
author_sort He, Taotao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale of Administrator Nurses (SEPSAN) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity among nurse managers. METHODS: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated for Chinese by the Brislin translation model included direct translation, back translation, integration, and cultural adjustment. A total of 382 nurse administrators were recruited from 20 general hospitals in five Chinese cities to assess the reliability and validity of the scale from April to May 2023. Validity assessments included content, structural, and convergent validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and test–retest reliability. RESULTS: The item-content validity index (I-CVI) of the scale ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) for the overall scale was 0.98. The exploratory factor analysis indicated five dimensions (planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, controlling, and inspecting) with 41 items. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 63.72%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit. The general Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.95, and the test–retest reliability was 0.87. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of SEPSAN showed satisfactory reliability and validity and thus can be used to assess the self-efficacy of nurse administrators in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10667306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Chinese Nursing Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106673062023-09-28 Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses He, Taotao Chen, Yang Song, Caini Li, Chaoqun Liu, Jia Huang, Jing Int J Nurs Sci Research Paper OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale of Administrator Nurses (SEPSAN) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity among nurse managers. METHODS: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated for Chinese by the Brislin translation model included direct translation, back translation, integration, and cultural adjustment. A total of 382 nurse administrators were recruited from 20 general hospitals in five Chinese cities to assess the reliability and validity of the scale from April to May 2023. Validity assessments included content, structural, and convergent validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and test–retest reliability. RESULTS: The item-content validity index (I-CVI) of the scale ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) for the overall scale was 0.98. The exploratory factor analysis indicated five dimensions (planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, controlling, and inspecting) with 41 items. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 63.72%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit. The general Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.95, and the test–retest reliability was 0.87. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of SEPSAN showed satisfactory reliability and validity and thus can be used to assess the self-efficacy of nurse administrators in China. Chinese Nursing Association 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10667306/ /pubmed/38020844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.015 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
He, Taotao
Chen, Yang
Song, Caini
Li, Chaoqun
Liu, Jia
Huang, Jing
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
title Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
title_full Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
title_short Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
title_sort reliability and validity of the chinese version of the self-efficacy perception scale for administrator nurses
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.015
work_keys_str_mv AT hetaotao reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheselfefficacyperceptionscaleforadministratornurses
AT chenyang reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheselfefficacyperceptionscaleforadministratornurses
AT songcaini reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheselfefficacyperceptionscaleforadministratornurses
AT lichaoqun reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheselfefficacyperceptionscaleforadministratornurses
AT liujia reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheselfefficacyperceptionscaleforadministratornurses
AT huangjing reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheselfefficacyperceptionscaleforadministratornurses