Cargando…

Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes

As of 2021, over 2.8 million small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures have been performed in China. However, knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula for post-SMILE cataract patients remains limited. This study included 52 eyes of 26 myopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Liangpin, Yuan, Liyun, Yang, Kun, Wu, Yanan, Alafati, Simayilijiang, Hua, Xia, Wang, Yan, Yuan, Xiaoyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47990-0
_version_ 1785149036491177984
author Li, Liangpin
Yuan, Liyun
Yang, Kun
Wu, Yanan
Alafati, Simayilijiang
Hua, Xia
Wang, Yan
Yuan, Xiaoyong
author_facet Li, Liangpin
Yuan, Liyun
Yang, Kun
Wu, Yanan
Alafati, Simayilijiang
Hua, Xia
Wang, Yan
Yuan, Xiaoyong
author_sort Li, Liangpin
collection PubMed
description As of 2021, over 2.8 million small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures have been performed in China. However, knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula for post-SMILE cataract patients remains limited. This study included 52 eyes of 26 myopic patients from northern China who underwent SMILE at Tianjin Eye Hospital from September 2022 to February 2023 to investigate the suitability of multiple IOL calculation formulas in post-SMILE patients using a theoretical surgical model. We compared the postoperative results obtained from three artificial intelligence (AI)-based formulas and six conventional formulas provided by the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS). These formulas were applied to calculate IOL power using both total keratometry (TK) and keratometry (K) values, and the results were compared to the preoperative results obtained from the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula for the SMILE patients. Among the evaluated formulas, the results obtained from the Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 Formula with TK (EVO-TK) (0.40 ± 0.29 D, range 0–1.23 D), Barrett True K with K formula (BTK-K, 0.41 ± 0.26 D, range 0.01–1.19 D), and Masket with K formula (Masket-K, 0.44 ± 0.33 D, range 0.02–1.39 D) demonstrated the closest proximity to BUII. Notably, the highest proportion of prediction errors within 0.5 D was observed with the BTK-K (71.15%), EVO-TK (69.23%), and Masket-K (67.31%), with the BTK-K showing a significantly higher proportion than the Masket-K (p < 0.001). Our research indicates that in post-SMILE patients, the EVO-TK, BTK-K, and Masket-K may yield more accurate calculation results. At their current stage in development, AI-based formulas do not demonstrate significant advantages over conventional formulas. However, the application of historical data can enhance the performance of these formulas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10667341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106673412023-11-23 Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes Li, Liangpin Yuan, Liyun Yang, Kun Wu, Yanan Alafati, Simayilijiang Hua, Xia Wang, Yan Yuan, Xiaoyong Sci Rep Article As of 2021, over 2.8 million small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures have been performed in China. However, knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula for post-SMILE cataract patients remains limited. This study included 52 eyes of 26 myopic patients from northern China who underwent SMILE at Tianjin Eye Hospital from September 2022 to February 2023 to investigate the suitability of multiple IOL calculation formulas in post-SMILE patients using a theoretical surgical model. We compared the postoperative results obtained from three artificial intelligence (AI)-based formulas and six conventional formulas provided by the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS). These formulas were applied to calculate IOL power using both total keratometry (TK) and keratometry (K) values, and the results were compared to the preoperative results obtained from the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula for the SMILE patients. Among the evaluated formulas, the results obtained from the Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 Formula with TK (EVO-TK) (0.40 ± 0.29 D, range 0–1.23 D), Barrett True K with K formula (BTK-K, 0.41 ± 0.26 D, range 0.01–1.19 D), and Masket with K formula (Masket-K, 0.44 ± 0.33 D, range 0.02–1.39 D) demonstrated the closest proximity to BUII. Notably, the highest proportion of prediction errors within 0.5 D was observed with the BTK-K (71.15%), EVO-TK (69.23%), and Masket-K (67.31%), with the BTK-K showing a significantly higher proportion than the Masket-K (p < 0.001). Our research indicates that in post-SMILE patients, the EVO-TK, BTK-K, and Masket-K may yield more accurate calculation results. At their current stage in development, AI-based formulas do not demonstrate significant advantages over conventional formulas. However, the application of historical data can enhance the performance of these formulas. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10667341/ /pubmed/37996736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47990-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Li, Liangpin
Yuan, Liyun
Yang, Kun
Wu, Yanan
Alafati, Simayilijiang
Hua, Xia
Wang, Yan
Yuan, Xiaoyong
Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes
title Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes
title_full Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes
title_fullStr Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes
title_short Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes
title_sort comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after smile in chinese myopic eyes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47990-0
work_keys_str_mv AT liliangpin comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT yuanliyun comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT yangkun comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT wuyanan comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT alafatisimayilijiang comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT huaxia comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT wangyan comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes
AT yuanxiaoyong comparisonoftheaccuracyof9intraocularlenspowercalculationformulasaftersmileinchinesemyopiceyes