Cargando…

Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of CT-like images based on a 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence (T1 GRE), an ultra-short echo time sequence (UTE), and a 3D T1-weighted spoiled multi-echo gradient-echo sequence (FRACTURE) with conventional CT in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feuerriegel, Georg C., Kronthaler, Sophia, Weiss, Kilian, Haller, Bernhard, Leonhardt, Yannik, Neumann, Jan, Pfeiffer, Daniela, Hesse, Nina, Erber, Bernd, Schwaiger, Benedikt J., Makowski, Marcus R., Woertler, Klaus, Karampinos, Dimitrios C., Wurm, Markus, Gersing, Alexandra S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37453986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09939-9
_version_ 1785139234479276032
author Feuerriegel, Georg C.
Kronthaler, Sophia
Weiss, Kilian
Haller, Bernhard
Leonhardt, Yannik
Neumann, Jan
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Hesse, Nina
Erber, Bernd
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Makowski, Marcus R.
Woertler, Klaus
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Wurm, Markus
Gersing, Alexandra S.
author_facet Feuerriegel, Georg C.
Kronthaler, Sophia
Weiss, Kilian
Haller, Bernhard
Leonhardt, Yannik
Neumann, Jan
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Hesse, Nina
Erber, Bernd
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Makowski, Marcus R.
Woertler, Klaus
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Wurm, Markus
Gersing, Alexandra S.
author_sort Feuerriegel, Georg C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of CT-like images based on a 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence (T1 GRE), an ultra-short echo time sequence (UTE), and a 3D T1-weighted spoiled multi-echo gradient-echo sequence (FRACTURE) with conventional CT in patients with suspected osseous shoulder pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected traumatic dislocation of the shoulder (n = 46, mean age 40 ± 14.5 years, 19 women) were prospectively recruited and received 3-T MR imaging including 3D T1 GRE, UTE, and 3D FRACTURE sequences. CT was performed in patients with acute fractures and served as standard of reference (n = 25). Agreement of morphological features between the modalities was analyzed including the glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs interval, glenoid track, and the anterior straight-line length. Agreement between the modalities was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, Student’s t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Inter- and intrareader assessment was evaluated with weighted Cohen’s κ and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: All osseous pathologies were detected accurately on all three CT-like sequences (n = 25, κ = 1.00). No significant difference in the percentage of glenoid bone loss was found between CT (mean ± standard deviation, 20.3% ± 8.0) and CT-like MR images (FRACTURE 20.6% ± 7.9, T1 GRE 20.4% ± 7.6, UTE 20.3% ± 7.7, p > 0.05). When comparing the different measurements on CT-like images, measurements performed using the UTE images correlated best with CT. CONCLUSION: Assessment of bony Bankart lesions and other osseous pathologies was feasible and accurate using CT-like images based on 3-T MRI compared with conventional CT. Compared to the T1 GRE and FRACTURE sequence, the UTE measurements correlated best with CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In an acute trauma setting, CT-like images based on a T1 GRE, UTE, or FRACTURE sequence might be a useful alternative to conventional CT scan sparing associated costs as well as radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • No significant differences were found for the assessment of the glenoid bone loss when comparing measurements of CT-like MR images with measurements of conventional CT images. • Compared to the T1 GRE and FRACTURE sequence, the UTE measurements correlated best with CT whereas the FRACTURE sequence appeared to be the most robust regarding motion artifacts. • The T1 GRE sequence had the highest resolution with high bone contrast and detailed delineation of even small fractures but was more susceptible to motion artifacts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09939-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10667374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106673742023-07-15 Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT Feuerriegel, Georg C. Kronthaler, Sophia Weiss, Kilian Haller, Bernhard Leonhardt, Yannik Neumann, Jan Pfeiffer, Daniela Hesse, Nina Erber, Bernd Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Makowski, Marcus R. Woertler, Klaus Karampinos, Dimitrios C. Wurm, Markus Gersing, Alexandra S. Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of CT-like images based on a 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence (T1 GRE), an ultra-short echo time sequence (UTE), and a 3D T1-weighted spoiled multi-echo gradient-echo sequence (FRACTURE) with conventional CT in patients with suspected osseous shoulder pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected traumatic dislocation of the shoulder (n = 46, mean age 40 ± 14.5 years, 19 women) were prospectively recruited and received 3-T MR imaging including 3D T1 GRE, UTE, and 3D FRACTURE sequences. CT was performed in patients with acute fractures and served as standard of reference (n = 25). Agreement of morphological features between the modalities was analyzed including the glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs interval, glenoid track, and the anterior straight-line length. Agreement between the modalities was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, Student’s t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Inter- and intrareader assessment was evaluated with weighted Cohen’s κ and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: All osseous pathologies were detected accurately on all three CT-like sequences (n = 25, κ = 1.00). No significant difference in the percentage of glenoid bone loss was found between CT (mean ± standard deviation, 20.3% ± 8.0) and CT-like MR images (FRACTURE 20.6% ± 7.9, T1 GRE 20.4% ± 7.6, UTE 20.3% ± 7.7, p > 0.05). When comparing the different measurements on CT-like images, measurements performed using the UTE images correlated best with CT. CONCLUSION: Assessment of bony Bankart lesions and other osseous pathologies was feasible and accurate using CT-like images based on 3-T MRI compared with conventional CT. Compared to the T1 GRE and FRACTURE sequence, the UTE measurements correlated best with CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In an acute trauma setting, CT-like images based on a T1 GRE, UTE, or FRACTURE sequence might be a useful alternative to conventional CT scan sparing associated costs as well as radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • No significant differences were found for the assessment of the glenoid bone loss when comparing measurements of CT-like MR images with measurements of conventional CT images. • Compared to the T1 GRE and FRACTURE sequence, the UTE measurements correlated best with CT whereas the FRACTURE sequence appeared to be the most robust regarding motion artifacts. • The T1 GRE sequence had the highest resolution with high bone contrast and detailed delineation of even small fractures but was more susceptible to motion artifacts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09939-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10667374/ /pubmed/37453986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09939-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal
Feuerriegel, Georg C.
Kronthaler, Sophia
Weiss, Kilian
Haller, Bernhard
Leonhardt, Yannik
Neumann, Jan
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Hesse, Nina
Erber, Bernd
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Makowski, Marcus R.
Woertler, Klaus
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Wurm, Markus
Gersing, Alexandra S.
Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT
title Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT
title_full Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT
title_fullStr Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT
title_short Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT
title_sort assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing mr-based ct-like images with conventional ct
topic Musculoskeletal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37453986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09939-9
work_keys_str_mv AT feuerriegelgeorgc assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT kronthalersophia assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT weisskilian assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT hallerbernhard assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT leonhardtyannik assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT neumannjan assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT pfeifferdaniela assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT hessenina assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT erberbernd assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT schwaigerbenediktj assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT makowskimarcusr assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT woertlerklaus assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT karampinosdimitriosc assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT wurmmarkus assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct
AT gersingalexandras assessmentofglenoidbonelossandotherosseousshoulderpathologiescomparingmrbasedctlikeimageswithconventionalct