Cargando…

Bowel wall thickness measured by MRI is useful for early diagnosis of bowel endometriosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI features of bowel endometriosis (BE) and verify its clinical significance compared with pathological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 2018, patients clinically diagnosed with deep endometriosis (DE) and planned to undergo surgery were enrolled prospectively. MRI par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yunxi, Gu, Shouxin, Ruan, Jingyao, Yi, Xiaofang, Xu, Congjian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09795-7
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI features of bowel endometriosis (BE) and verify its clinical significance compared with pathological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 2018, patients clinically diagnosed with deep endometriosis (DE) and planned to undergo surgery were enrolled prospectively. MRI parameters including traction, thickening sign of the rectum, obliteration of the Douglas Pouch, sign of adenomyosis, and pelvic adhesion were extracted. Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to explore their association with pathological diagnosis of BE. ROC curve was utilized to ascertain the appropriate cutoff value for predicting the presence and assessing the severity of BE. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients with DE were recruited, and 154 BE cases were pathologically confirmed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that thickness of the rectal wall, traction sign of the rectum, and obliteration of the Douglas Pouch were independent factors to predict the presence of BE with the OR 1.59 (95% CI: 1.29–1.96), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09–0.67), and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.07–0.40), respectively (p all < 0.01). A cutoff value of 6.0 mm for the thickness of rectal wall resulted in the highest predictive value of BE (specificity: 90.3%; sensitivity: 78.6%). For patients with measured thickness of the rectal wall over 6.0 mm, 72.1% (93/129) was confirmed BE with lesions infiltrated more than muscular layer. CONCLUSION: This prospective study indicates that based on precise definition of visualized features on MRI images, BE could be recognized pre-operatively. DE patients with thickness of rectal wall exceeding 6.0 mm have a greater probability of BE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Based on precise definition of visualized features and accurate measurement on MRI images, bowel infiltrating among deep endometriosis patients could be recognized pre-operatively. KEY POINTS: • Precise definition of measurable MRI parameters made it possible for early detection of bowel endometriosis. • Thickening sign, traction sign of the rectum, and obliteration of the Douglas Pouch were typical radiological indicators for bowel endometriosis. • Bowel involvement is more sensitive to be detected among pelvic deep endometriosis patients with the thickness of the rectal wall over 6.0 mm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09795-7.