Cargando…
Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1)
Cryptosporidium is a major cause of diarrhoeal disease and mortality in young children in resource-poor countries, for which no vaccines or adequate therapeutic options are available. Infection in humans is primarily caused by two species: C. hominis and C. parvum. Despite C. hominis being the domin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37776335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07979-0 |
_version_ | 1785139255053385728 |
---|---|
author | Gunasekera, Samantha Clode, Peta L. King, Brendon Monis, Paul Thierry, Benjamin Carr, Jillian M. Chopra, Abha Watson, Mark O’Dea, Mark Hijjawi, Nawal Ryan, Una |
author_facet | Gunasekera, Samantha Clode, Peta L. King, Brendon Monis, Paul Thierry, Benjamin Carr, Jillian M. Chopra, Abha Watson, Mark O’Dea, Mark Hijjawi, Nawal Ryan, Una |
author_sort | Gunasekera, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cryptosporidium is a major cause of diarrhoeal disease and mortality in young children in resource-poor countries, for which no vaccines or adequate therapeutic options are available. Infection in humans is primarily caused by two species: C. hominis and C. parvum. Despite C. hominis being the dominant species infecting humans in most countries, very little is known about its growth characteristics and life cycle in vitro, given that the majority of our knowledge of the in vitro development of Cryptosporidium has been based on C. parvum. In the present study, the growth and development of two C. parvum isolates (subtypes Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) and one C. hominis isolate (subtype IdA15G1) in HCT-8 cells were examined and compared at 24 h and 48 h using morphological data acquired with scanning electron microscopy. Our data indicated no significant differences in the proportion of meronts or merozoites between species or subtypes at either time-point. Sexual development was observed at the 48-h time-point across both species through observations of both microgamonts and macrogamonts, with a higher frequency of macrogamont observations in C. hominis (IdA15G1) cultures at 48-h post-infection compared to both C. parvum subtypes. This corresponded to differences in the proportion of trophozoites observed at the same time point. No differences in proportion of microgamonts were observed between the three subtypes, which were rarely observed across all cultures. In summary, our data indicate that asexual development of C. hominis is similar to that of C. parvum, while sexual development is accelerated in C. hominis. This study provides new insights into differences in the in vitro growth characteristics of C. hominis when compared to C. parvum, which will facilitate our understanding of the sexual development of both species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10667462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106674622023-09-30 Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) Gunasekera, Samantha Clode, Peta L. King, Brendon Monis, Paul Thierry, Benjamin Carr, Jillian M. Chopra, Abha Watson, Mark O’Dea, Mark Hijjawi, Nawal Ryan, Una Parasitol Res Research Cryptosporidium is a major cause of diarrhoeal disease and mortality in young children in resource-poor countries, for which no vaccines or adequate therapeutic options are available. Infection in humans is primarily caused by two species: C. hominis and C. parvum. Despite C. hominis being the dominant species infecting humans in most countries, very little is known about its growth characteristics and life cycle in vitro, given that the majority of our knowledge of the in vitro development of Cryptosporidium has been based on C. parvum. In the present study, the growth and development of two C. parvum isolates (subtypes Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) and one C. hominis isolate (subtype IdA15G1) in HCT-8 cells were examined and compared at 24 h and 48 h using morphological data acquired with scanning electron microscopy. Our data indicated no significant differences in the proportion of meronts or merozoites between species or subtypes at either time-point. Sexual development was observed at the 48-h time-point across both species through observations of both microgamonts and macrogamonts, with a higher frequency of macrogamont observations in C. hominis (IdA15G1) cultures at 48-h post-infection compared to both C. parvum subtypes. This corresponded to differences in the proportion of trophozoites observed at the same time point. No differences in proportion of microgamonts were observed between the three subtypes, which were rarely observed across all cultures. In summary, our data indicate that asexual development of C. hominis is similar to that of C. parvum, while sexual development is accelerated in C. hominis. This study provides new insights into differences in the in vitro growth characteristics of C. hominis when compared to C. parvum, which will facilitate our understanding of the sexual development of both species. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10667462/ /pubmed/37776335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07979-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Gunasekera, Samantha Clode, Peta L. King, Brendon Monis, Paul Thierry, Benjamin Carr, Jillian M. Chopra, Abha Watson, Mark O’Dea, Mark Hijjawi, Nawal Ryan, Una Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) |
title | Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) |
title_full | Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) |
title_short | Comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of Cryptosporidium hominis (IdA15G1) and Cryptosporidium parvum (Iowa-IIaA17G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) |
title_sort | comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of cryptosporidium hominis (ida15g1) and cryptosporidium parvum (iowa-iiaa17g2r1 and iiaa18g3r1) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37776335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07979-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunasekerasamantha comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT clodepetal comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT kingbrendon comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT monispaul comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT thierrybenjamin comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT carrjillianm comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT chopraabha comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT watsonmark comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT odeamark comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT hijjawinawal comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 AT ryanuna comparisonofinvitrogrowthcharacteristicsofcryptosporidiumhominisida15g1andcryptosporidiumparvumiowaiiaa17g2r1andiiaa18g3r1 |