Cargando…

Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E

INTRODUCTION: Anti‐amyloid‐β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer the promise of disease modification and are emerging treatment options in Alzheimer's disease. Anti‐Aβ mAbs require brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to detect anti‐amyloid‐induced amyloid‐related imaging abn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bracoud, Luc, Klein, Gregory, Lyons, Marco, Scelsi, Marzia A., Wojtowicz, Jakub, Bullain, Szofia, Purcell, Derk, Fiebach, Jochen B., Barakos, Jerome, Suhy, Joyce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12503
_version_ 1785149059530489856
author Bracoud, Luc
Klein, Gregory
Lyons, Marco
Scelsi, Marzia A.
Wojtowicz, Jakub
Bullain, Szofia
Purcell, Derk
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Barakos, Jerome
Suhy, Joyce
author_facet Bracoud, Luc
Klein, Gregory
Lyons, Marco
Scelsi, Marzia A.
Wojtowicz, Jakub
Bullain, Szofia
Purcell, Derk
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Barakos, Jerome
Suhy, Joyce
author_sort Bracoud, Luc
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Anti‐amyloid‐β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer the promise of disease modification and are emerging treatment options in Alzheimer's disease. Anti‐Aβ mAbs require brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to detect anti‐amyloid‐induced amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), important adverse drug reactions associated with some anti‐Aβ mAbs currently available in the United States and in clinical development. We present a simple rating system for ARIA‐edema (ARIA‐E) that can assess severity on a 3‐ or 5‐point scale based upon a single linear measurement of the largest area of lesion, and dissemination in space, termed the 3‐point Severity Scale of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3) and the 5‐point Severity Scale of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐5), respectively. METHODS: MRI results were collected from 75 participants from the SCarlet RoAD (NCT01224106) and Marguerite RoAD (NCT02051608) studies of gantenerumab. Three neuroradiologists experienced with the detection of ARIA‐E were selected to read all cases independently. One rater was then chosen for a second read to assess intra‐reader reproducibility. RESULTS: The three raters had high agreement in identifying and grading ARIA‐E. The Cohen/Fleiss kappa (κ) scores (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the inter‐ and intra‐reader comparisons for SSAE‐3 and SSAE‐5 were 0.79 (0.70–1.00), 0.94 (0.94–1.00), 0.73 (0.66–1.00), and 0.90 (0.90–1.00), respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that SSAE‐3 and SSAE‐5 are valid ARIA‐E rating scales for use in routine clinical practice by experienced radiologists in specialized settings. The application of these scales in everyday use in clinical practice will support the expansion of anti‐Aβ mAbs as a treatment option for people living with Alzheimer's disease. HIGHLIGHTS: A simple rating scale is needed to rate severity of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities–edema (ARIA‐E) in both research and clinical settings. The 3‐ and 5‐point Severity Scales of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3/‐5) have good inter‐ and intra‐reader agreement. The SSAE‐3/‐5 have been used in most major Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials to date and are suitable for large‐scale use in routine clinical practice, which may help support the expansion of anti‐amyloid antibodies as treatment options for AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10667607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106676072023-11-23 Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E Bracoud, Luc Klein, Gregory Lyons, Marco Scelsi, Marzia A. Wojtowicz, Jakub Bullain, Szofia Purcell, Derk Fiebach, Jochen B. Barakos, Jerome Suhy, Joyce Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Anti‐amyloid‐β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer the promise of disease modification and are emerging treatment options in Alzheimer's disease. Anti‐Aβ mAbs require brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to detect anti‐amyloid‐induced amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), important adverse drug reactions associated with some anti‐Aβ mAbs currently available in the United States and in clinical development. We present a simple rating system for ARIA‐edema (ARIA‐E) that can assess severity on a 3‐ or 5‐point scale based upon a single linear measurement of the largest area of lesion, and dissemination in space, termed the 3‐point Severity Scale of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3) and the 5‐point Severity Scale of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐5), respectively. METHODS: MRI results were collected from 75 participants from the SCarlet RoAD (NCT01224106) and Marguerite RoAD (NCT02051608) studies of gantenerumab. Three neuroradiologists experienced with the detection of ARIA‐E were selected to read all cases independently. One rater was then chosen for a second read to assess intra‐reader reproducibility. RESULTS: The three raters had high agreement in identifying and grading ARIA‐E. The Cohen/Fleiss kappa (κ) scores (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the inter‐ and intra‐reader comparisons for SSAE‐3 and SSAE‐5 were 0.79 (0.70–1.00), 0.94 (0.94–1.00), 0.73 (0.66–1.00), and 0.90 (0.90–1.00), respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that SSAE‐3 and SSAE‐5 are valid ARIA‐E rating scales for use in routine clinical practice by experienced radiologists in specialized settings. The application of these scales in everyday use in clinical practice will support the expansion of anti‐Aβ mAbs as a treatment option for people living with Alzheimer's disease. HIGHLIGHTS: A simple rating scale is needed to rate severity of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities–edema (ARIA‐E) in both research and clinical settings. The 3‐ and 5‐point Severity Scales of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3/‐5) have good inter‐ and intra‐reader agreement. The SSAE‐3/‐5 have been used in most major Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials to date and are suitable for large‐scale use in routine clinical practice, which may help support the expansion of anti‐amyloid antibodies as treatment options for AD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10667607/ /pubmed/38026755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12503 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bracoud, Luc
Klein, Gregory
Lyons, Marco
Scelsi, Marzia A.
Wojtowicz, Jakub
Bullain, Szofia
Purcell, Derk
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Barakos, Jerome
Suhy, Joyce
Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E
title Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E
title_full Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E
title_fullStr Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E
title_full_unstemmed Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E
title_short Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E
title_sort validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess aria‐e
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12503
work_keys_str_mv AT bracoudluc validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT kleingregory validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT lyonsmarco validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT scelsimarziaa validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT wojtowiczjakub validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT bullainszofia validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT purcellderk validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT fiebachjochenb validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT barakosjerome validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae
AT suhyjoyce validationof3and5pointseverityscalestoassessariae