Cargando…

Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification

INTRODUCTION: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. From this definition, accurate enumeration of probiotic products is a necessity. Nonetheless, this definition does not specify the methods for assessing such viability....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordal, Peter Lüttge, Diaz, Marcos González, Morazzoni, Carlotta, Allesina, Serena, Zogno, Daniele, Cattivelli, Daniela, Galletti, Serena, Guidesi, Elena, Warzée, Jean-Pol, Pane, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285075
_version_ 1785139311945973760
author Jordal, Peter Lüttge
Diaz, Marcos González
Morazzoni, Carlotta
Allesina, Serena
Zogno, Daniele
Cattivelli, Daniela
Galletti, Serena
Guidesi, Elena
Warzée, Jean-Pol
Pane, Marco
author_facet Jordal, Peter Lüttge
Diaz, Marcos González
Morazzoni, Carlotta
Allesina, Serena
Zogno, Daniele
Cattivelli, Daniela
Galletti, Serena
Guidesi, Elena
Warzée, Jean-Pol
Pane, Marco
author_sort Jordal, Peter Lüttge
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. From this definition, accurate enumeration of probiotic products is a necessity. Nonetheless, this definition does not specify the methods for assessing such viability. Colony forming units is the de facto gold standard for enumerating viable in probiotic products. The notion of microbial viability has been anchored in the concept of cultivability, which refers to a cell’s capacity to replicate and form colonies on agar media. However, there is a growing consensus that the term “viability” should not be exclusively tied to the ability to cultivate cells. For example, bacterial cells can exist in a Viable But Non-Culturable (VBNC) state, characterized by the maintenance of characteristics such as membrane integrity, enzymatic activity, pH gradients, and elevated levels of rRNA, despite losing the ability to form colonies. METHODS: Herein we present the results of a collaborative inter-laboratory ring test for cytometric bacterial quantification. Specifically, membrane integrity fluorescence flow cytometry (FFC) method and the newer impedance flow cytometry (IFC) method have been used. Both methods interrogate single cells in solution for the presence of intact membranes. FFC exploits fluorochromes that reflect the presence or absence of an intact membrane. IFC probes membrane integrity in a label-free approach by detecting membrane-induced hindrances to the propagation of electricity. RESULTS: A performance ring-test and comparison design on the FFC method showed that the method is robust against the exchange of equipment, procedures, materials, and operators. After initial method optimization with assessments of rehydration medium, wake-up duration, and phase shift gating on the individual strains, the IFC method showed good agreement with the FFC results. Specifically, we tested 6 distinct species of probiotic bacteria (3 Lactobacillus and 3 Bifidobacterium strains) finding good agreement between FFC and IFC results in terms of total and live cells. DISCUSSION: Together, these results demonstrate that flow cytometry is a reliable, precise, and user-friendly culture-independent method for bacterial enumeration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10667725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106677252023-11-10 Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification Jordal, Peter Lüttge Diaz, Marcos González Morazzoni, Carlotta Allesina, Serena Zogno, Daniele Cattivelli, Daniela Galletti, Serena Guidesi, Elena Warzée, Jean-Pol Pane, Marco Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. From this definition, accurate enumeration of probiotic products is a necessity. Nonetheless, this definition does not specify the methods for assessing such viability. Colony forming units is the de facto gold standard for enumerating viable in probiotic products. The notion of microbial viability has been anchored in the concept of cultivability, which refers to a cell’s capacity to replicate and form colonies on agar media. However, there is a growing consensus that the term “viability” should not be exclusively tied to the ability to cultivate cells. For example, bacterial cells can exist in a Viable But Non-Culturable (VBNC) state, characterized by the maintenance of characteristics such as membrane integrity, enzymatic activity, pH gradients, and elevated levels of rRNA, despite losing the ability to form colonies. METHODS: Herein we present the results of a collaborative inter-laboratory ring test for cytometric bacterial quantification. Specifically, membrane integrity fluorescence flow cytometry (FFC) method and the newer impedance flow cytometry (IFC) method have been used. Both methods interrogate single cells in solution for the presence of intact membranes. FFC exploits fluorochromes that reflect the presence or absence of an intact membrane. IFC probes membrane integrity in a label-free approach by detecting membrane-induced hindrances to the propagation of electricity. RESULTS: A performance ring-test and comparison design on the FFC method showed that the method is robust against the exchange of equipment, procedures, materials, and operators. After initial method optimization with assessments of rehydration medium, wake-up duration, and phase shift gating on the individual strains, the IFC method showed good agreement with the FFC results. Specifically, we tested 6 distinct species of probiotic bacteria (3 Lactobacillus and 3 Bifidobacterium strains) finding good agreement between FFC and IFC results in terms of total and live cells. DISCUSSION: Together, these results demonstrate that flow cytometry is a reliable, precise, and user-friendly culture-independent method for bacterial enumeration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10667725/ /pubmed/38029213 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285075 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jordal, Diaz, Morazzoni, Allesina, Zogno, Cattivelli, Galletti, Guidesi, Warzée and Pane. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Jordal, Peter Lüttge
Diaz, Marcos González
Morazzoni, Carlotta
Allesina, Serena
Zogno, Daniele
Cattivelli, Daniela
Galletti, Serena
Guidesi, Elena
Warzée, Jean-Pol
Pane, Marco
Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
title Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
title_full Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
title_fullStr Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
title_short Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
title_sort collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285075
work_keys_str_mv AT jordalpeterluttge collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT diazmarcosgonzalez collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT morazzonicarlotta collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT allesinaserena collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT zognodaniele collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT cattivellidaniela collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT gallettiserena collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT guidesielena collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT warzeejeanpol collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification
AT panemarco collaborativecytometricinterlaboratoryringtestforprobioticsquantification