Cargando…
Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683 |
_version_ | 1785139396665671680 |
---|---|
author | Lenga, Pavlina Gülec, Gelo Kiening, Karl Unterberg, Andreas W. Ishak, Basem |
author_facet | Lenga, Pavlina Gülec, Gelo Kiening, Karl Unterberg, Andreas W. Ishak, Basem |
author_sort | Lenga, Pavlina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. RESULTS: 21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10668093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106680932023-10-05 Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up Lenga, Pavlina Gülec, Gelo Kiening, Karl Unterberg, Andreas W. Ishak, Basem Brain Spine Article INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. RESULTS: 21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities. Elsevier 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10668093/ /pubmed/38021012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lenga, Pavlina Gülec, Gelo Kiening, Karl Unterberg, Andreas W. Ishak, Basem Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
title | Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
title_full | Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
title_short | Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
title_sort | anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lengapavlina anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup AT gulecgelo anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup AT kieningkarl anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup AT unterbergandreasw anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup AT ishakbasem anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup |