Cargando…

Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lenga, Pavlina, Gülec, Gelo, Kiening, Karl, Unterberg, Andreas W., Ishak, Basem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683
_version_ 1785139396665671680
author Lenga, Pavlina
Gülec, Gelo
Kiening, Karl
Unterberg, Andreas W.
Ishak, Basem
author_facet Lenga, Pavlina
Gülec, Gelo
Kiening, Karl
Unterberg, Andreas W.
Ishak, Basem
author_sort Lenga, Pavlina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. RESULTS: 21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106680932023-10-05 Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up Lenga, Pavlina Gülec, Gelo Kiening, Karl Unterberg, Andreas W. Ishak, Basem Brain Spine Article INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. RESULTS: 21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: ACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities. Elsevier 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10668093/ /pubmed/38021012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lenga, Pavlina
Gülec, Gelo
Kiening, Karl
Unterberg, Andreas W.
Ishak, Basem
Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_full Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_fullStr Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_short Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_sort anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102683
work_keys_str_mv AT lengapavlina anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT gulecgelo anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT kieningkarl anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT unterbergandreasw anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT ishakbasem anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup