Cargando…
Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up
INTRODUCTION: Instrumented lumbar fusion by either the anterior or transforaminal approach has different advantages and disadvantages. Few studies have compared PatientReported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) between stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (SA-ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102713 |
_version_ | 1785149076239548416 |
---|---|
author | Toma, Ali A. Hallager, Dennis W. Bech, Rune D. Carreon, Leah Y. Andersen, Mikkel Ø. Udby, Peter M. |
author_facet | Toma, Ali A. Hallager, Dennis W. Bech, Rune D. Carreon, Leah Y. Andersen, Mikkel Ø. Udby, Peter M. |
author_sort | Toma, Ali A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Instrumented lumbar fusion by either the anterior or transforaminal approach has different advantages and disadvantages. Few studies have compared PatientReported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) between stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (SA-ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This is a register-based dual-center study on patients with severe disc degeneration (DD) and low back pain (LBP) undergoing single-level SA-ALIF or TLIF. Comparing PROMs, including disability, quality of life, back- and leg-pain and patient satisfaction two years after SA-ALIF or TLIF, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected preoperatively and at one and two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, walking ability, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, and quality of life (QoL) measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index score. To reduce baseline differences between groups, propensity-score matching was employed in a 1:1 fashion. RESULTS: 92 patients were matched, 46 S A-ALIF and 46 TLIF. They were comparable preoperatively, with no significant difference in demographic data or PROMs (P > 0.10). Both groups obtained statistically significant improvement in the ODI, QoL and VAS-score (P < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed (P = 0.14). No statistically significant differences in EQ-5D index scores (P = 0.25), VAS score for leg pain (P = 0.88) and back pain (P = 0.37) at two years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in ODI, VAS-scores for back and leg pain, and EQ-5D index score were registered after two-year follow-up with both SA-ALIF and TLIF. No significant differences in improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10668097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106680972023-11-14 Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up Toma, Ali A. Hallager, Dennis W. Bech, Rune D. Carreon, Leah Y. Andersen, Mikkel Ø. Udby, Peter M. Brain Spine Article INTRODUCTION: Instrumented lumbar fusion by either the anterior or transforaminal approach has different advantages and disadvantages. Few studies have compared PatientReported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) between stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (SA-ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). RESEARCH QUESTION: This is a register-based dual-center study on patients with severe disc degeneration (DD) and low back pain (LBP) undergoing single-level SA-ALIF or TLIF. Comparing PROMs, including disability, quality of life, back- and leg-pain and patient satisfaction two years after SA-ALIF or TLIF, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected preoperatively and at one and two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, walking ability, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, and quality of life (QoL) measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index score. To reduce baseline differences between groups, propensity-score matching was employed in a 1:1 fashion. RESULTS: 92 patients were matched, 46 S A-ALIF and 46 TLIF. They were comparable preoperatively, with no significant difference in demographic data or PROMs (P > 0.10). Both groups obtained statistically significant improvement in the ODI, QoL and VAS-score (P < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed (P = 0.14). No statistically significant differences in EQ-5D index scores (P = 0.25), VAS score for leg pain (P = 0.88) and back pain (P = 0.37) at two years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in ODI, VAS-scores for back and leg pain, and EQ-5D index score were registered after two-year follow-up with both SA-ALIF and TLIF. No significant differences in improvement. Elsevier 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10668097/ /pubmed/38021018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102713 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Toma, Ali A. Hallager, Dennis W. Bech, Rune D. Carreon, Leah Y. Andersen, Mikkel Ø. Udby, Peter M. Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
title | Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
title_full | Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
title_short | Stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in patients with low back pain – A propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
title_sort | stand-alone alif versus tlif in patients with low back pain – a propensity-matched cohort study with two-year follow-up |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102713 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomaalia standalonealifversustlifinpatientswithlowbackpainapropensitymatchedcohortstudywithtwoyearfollowup AT hallagerdennisw standalonealifversustlifinpatientswithlowbackpainapropensitymatchedcohortstudywithtwoyearfollowup AT bechruned standalonealifversustlifinpatientswithlowbackpainapropensitymatchedcohortstudywithtwoyearfollowup AT carreonleahy standalonealifversustlifinpatientswithlowbackpainapropensitymatchedcohortstudywithtwoyearfollowup AT andersenmikkelø standalonealifversustlifinpatientswithlowbackpainapropensitymatchedcohortstudywithtwoyearfollowup AT udbypeterm standalonealifversustlifinpatientswithlowbackpainapropensitymatchedcohortstudywithtwoyearfollowup |