Cargando…

Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience

Monitoring and analysis of anesthesia depth status data refers to evaluating the anesthesia depth status of patients during the surgical process by monitoring their physiological index data, and conducting analysis and judgment. The depth of anesthesia is crucial for the safety and success of the su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bi, Yuhua, Huang, Junping, Li, Mei, Li, Siying, Lei, Heshou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0719
_version_ 1785149108437123072
author Bi, Yuhua
Huang, Junping
Li, Mei
Li, Siying
Lei, Heshou
author_facet Bi, Yuhua
Huang, Junping
Li, Mei
Li, Siying
Lei, Heshou
author_sort Bi, Yuhua
collection PubMed
description Monitoring and analysis of anesthesia depth status data refers to evaluating the anesthesia depth status of patients during the surgical process by monitoring their physiological index data, and conducting analysis and judgment. The depth of anesthesia is crucial for the safety and success of the surgical process. By monitoring the state of anesthesia depth, abnormal conditions of patients can be detected in a timely manner and corresponding measures can be taken to prevent accidents from occurring. Traditional anesthesia monitoring methods currently include computer tomography, electrocardiogram, respiratory monitoring, etc. In this regard, traditional physiological indicator monitoring methods have certain limitations and cannot directly reflect the patient’s neural activity status. The monitoring and analysis methods based on neuroscience can obtain more information from the level of brain neural activity. Purpose: In this article, the monitoring and analysis of anesthesia depth status data would be studied through neuroscience. Methods: Through a controlled experiment, the monitoring accuracy of traditional anesthesia status monitoring algorithm and neuroscience-based anesthesia status monitoring algorithm was studied, and the information entropy and oxygen saturation of electroencephalogram signals in patients with different anesthesia depth were explored. Results: The experiment proved that the average monitoring accuracy of the traditional anesthesia state monitoring algorithm in patients’ blood drug concentration and oxygen saturation reached 95.55 and 95.00%, respectively. In contrast, the anesthesia state monitoring algorithm based on neuroscience performs better, with the average monitoring accuracy of drug concentration and oxygen saturation reaching 98.00 and 97.09%, respectively. This experimental result fully proved that the monitoring performance of anesthesia state monitoring algorithms based on neuroscience is better. Conclusion: The experiment proved the powerful monitoring ability of the anesthesia state monitoring algorithm based on neuroscience used in this article, and explained the changing trend of brain nerve signals and oxygen saturation of patients with different anesthesia depth states, which provided a new research method for the monitoring and analysis technology of anesthesia depth state data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106683312023-11-21 Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience Bi, Yuhua Huang, Junping Li, Mei Li, Siying Lei, Heshou Open Life Sci Research Article Monitoring and analysis of anesthesia depth status data refers to evaluating the anesthesia depth status of patients during the surgical process by monitoring their physiological index data, and conducting analysis and judgment. The depth of anesthesia is crucial for the safety and success of the surgical process. By monitoring the state of anesthesia depth, abnormal conditions of patients can be detected in a timely manner and corresponding measures can be taken to prevent accidents from occurring. Traditional anesthesia monitoring methods currently include computer tomography, electrocardiogram, respiratory monitoring, etc. In this regard, traditional physiological indicator monitoring methods have certain limitations and cannot directly reflect the patient’s neural activity status. The monitoring and analysis methods based on neuroscience can obtain more information from the level of brain neural activity. Purpose: In this article, the monitoring and analysis of anesthesia depth status data would be studied through neuroscience. Methods: Through a controlled experiment, the monitoring accuracy of traditional anesthesia status monitoring algorithm and neuroscience-based anesthesia status monitoring algorithm was studied, and the information entropy and oxygen saturation of electroencephalogram signals in patients with different anesthesia depth were explored. Results: The experiment proved that the average monitoring accuracy of the traditional anesthesia state monitoring algorithm in patients’ blood drug concentration and oxygen saturation reached 95.55 and 95.00%, respectively. In contrast, the anesthesia state monitoring algorithm based on neuroscience performs better, with the average monitoring accuracy of drug concentration and oxygen saturation reaching 98.00 and 97.09%, respectively. This experimental result fully proved that the monitoring performance of anesthesia state monitoring algorithms based on neuroscience is better. Conclusion: The experiment proved the powerful monitoring ability of the anesthesia state monitoring algorithm based on neuroscience used in this article, and explained the changing trend of brain nerve signals and oxygen saturation of patients with different anesthesia depth states, which provided a new research method for the monitoring and analysis technology of anesthesia depth state data. De Gruyter 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10668331/ /pubmed/38027229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0719 Text en © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bi, Yuhua
Huang, Junping
Li, Mei
Li, Siying
Lei, Heshou
Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
title Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
title_full Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
title_fullStr Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
title_short Monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
title_sort monitoring and evaluation of anesthesia depth status data based on neuroscience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0719
work_keys_str_mv AT biyuhua monitoringandevaluationofanesthesiadepthstatusdatabasedonneuroscience
AT huangjunping monitoringandevaluationofanesthesiadepthstatusdatabasedonneuroscience
AT limei monitoringandevaluationofanesthesiadepthstatusdatabasedonneuroscience
AT lisiying monitoringandevaluationofanesthesiadepthstatusdatabasedonneuroscience
AT leiheshou monitoringandevaluationofanesthesiadepthstatusdatabasedonneuroscience