Cargando…

Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients

AIMS: To perform the first psychometric analysis of the Norwegian version of the eHLQ using confirmative factor analysis (CFA) procedures in a population of patients admitted to hospital using a cross-sectional design. The eHLQ consists of 35 items capturing the 7-dimensional eHealth Literacy Framew...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermansen, Å., Andersen, M. H., Borge, C. R., Dahl, K. G., Larsen, M. H., Lønning, K., Meyer, K. B., Vidnes, T. K., Wahl, A. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01449-z
_version_ 1785149120309100544
author Hermansen, Å.
Andersen, M. H.
Borge, C. R.
Dahl, K. G.
Larsen, M. H.
Lønning, K.
Meyer, K. B.
Vidnes, T. K.
Wahl, A. K.
author_facet Hermansen, Å.
Andersen, M. H.
Borge, C. R.
Dahl, K. G.
Larsen, M. H.
Lønning, K.
Meyer, K. B.
Vidnes, T. K.
Wahl, A. K.
author_sort Hermansen, Å.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To perform the first psychometric analysis of the Norwegian version of the eHLQ using confirmative factor analysis (CFA) procedures in a population of patients admitted to hospital using a cross-sectional design. The eHLQ consists of 35 items capturing the 7-dimensional eHealth Literacy Framework (eHLF) which describes users' attributes, user's interaction with technologies and user's experience with digital health systems. METHODS: The 7 independent scales of the eHLQ was translated from Danish and culturally adapted into the Norwegian language following a standardised protocol. Assessment of construct validity of the eHLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 260 patients hospitalized at a Norwegian University Hospital in the Oslo area during a two-week period in June 2021. The analysis included using correlation analysis (Pearsons R), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: All factor loadings were high to acceptable (i.e. > 0.6), except for five items which had somewhat lower loadings. Regarding internal consistency, alpha ranged from 0.73 to 0.90. For optimal CFA fit for the different scale models, correlated residuals were required for five of the seven scales. Overall our analysis shows an intermediate fit of the orginal construct. Scale intercorrelations were all below 0.8, indicating an overall acceptable discriminant validity between the 7 dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the CFA analysis indicate that for almost all 7 eHLQ scales, an acceptable model fit was achieved. The 260 hospitalized patients included in this study represented a variety of diagnoses, recruited from a geographically limited area. Further studies on psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of eHLQ in larger samples, diverse settings and by using more comprehensive approaches are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106683912023-11-23 Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients Hermansen, Å. Andersen, M. H. Borge, C. R. Dahl, K. G. Larsen, M. H. Lønning, K. Meyer, K. B. Vidnes, T. K. Wahl, A. K. BMC Psychol Research AIMS: To perform the first psychometric analysis of the Norwegian version of the eHLQ using confirmative factor analysis (CFA) procedures in a population of patients admitted to hospital using a cross-sectional design. The eHLQ consists of 35 items capturing the 7-dimensional eHealth Literacy Framework (eHLF) which describes users' attributes, user's interaction with technologies and user's experience with digital health systems. METHODS: The 7 independent scales of the eHLQ was translated from Danish and culturally adapted into the Norwegian language following a standardised protocol. Assessment of construct validity of the eHLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 260 patients hospitalized at a Norwegian University Hospital in the Oslo area during a two-week period in June 2021. The analysis included using correlation analysis (Pearsons R), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: All factor loadings were high to acceptable (i.e. > 0.6), except for five items which had somewhat lower loadings. Regarding internal consistency, alpha ranged from 0.73 to 0.90. For optimal CFA fit for the different scale models, correlated residuals were required for five of the seven scales. Overall our analysis shows an intermediate fit of the orginal construct. Scale intercorrelations were all below 0.8, indicating an overall acceptable discriminant validity between the 7 dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the CFA analysis indicate that for almost all 7 eHLQ scales, an acceptable model fit was achieved. The 260 hospitalized patients included in this study represented a variety of diagnoses, recruited from a geographically limited area. Further studies on psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of eHLQ in larger samples, diverse settings and by using more comprehensive approaches are warranted. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10668391/ /pubmed/37996858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01449-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hermansen, Å.
Andersen, M. H.
Borge, C. R.
Dahl, K. G.
Larsen, M. H.
Lønning, K.
Meyer, K. B.
Vidnes, T. K.
Wahl, A. K.
Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
title Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
title_full Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
title_fullStr Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
title_short Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
title_sort preliminary validity testing of the ehealth literacy questionnaire (ehlq): a confirmatory factor analysis (cfa) in norwegian hospitalized patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01449-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hermansena preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT andersenmh preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT borgecr preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT dahlkg preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT larsenmh preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT lønningk preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT meyerkb preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT vidnestk preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients
AT wahlak preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients