Cargando…
Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients
AIMS: To perform the first psychometric analysis of the Norwegian version of the eHLQ using confirmative factor analysis (CFA) procedures in a population of patients admitted to hospital using a cross-sectional design. The eHLQ consists of 35 items capturing the 7-dimensional eHealth Literacy Framew...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01449-z |
_version_ | 1785149120309100544 |
---|---|
author | Hermansen, Å. Andersen, M. H. Borge, C. R. Dahl, K. G. Larsen, M. H. Lønning, K. Meyer, K. B. Vidnes, T. K. Wahl, A. K. |
author_facet | Hermansen, Å. Andersen, M. H. Borge, C. R. Dahl, K. G. Larsen, M. H. Lønning, K. Meyer, K. B. Vidnes, T. K. Wahl, A. K. |
author_sort | Hermansen, Å. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To perform the first psychometric analysis of the Norwegian version of the eHLQ using confirmative factor analysis (CFA) procedures in a population of patients admitted to hospital using a cross-sectional design. The eHLQ consists of 35 items capturing the 7-dimensional eHealth Literacy Framework (eHLF) which describes users' attributes, user's interaction with technologies and user's experience with digital health systems. METHODS: The 7 independent scales of the eHLQ was translated from Danish and culturally adapted into the Norwegian language following a standardised protocol. Assessment of construct validity of the eHLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 260 patients hospitalized at a Norwegian University Hospital in the Oslo area during a two-week period in June 2021. The analysis included using correlation analysis (Pearsons R), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: All factor loadings were high to acceptable (i.e. > 0.6), except for five items which had somewhat lower loadings. Regarding internal consistency, alpha ranged from 0.73 to 0.90. For optimal CFA fit for the different scale models, correlated residuals were required for five of the seven scales. Overall our analysis shows an intermediate fit of the orginal construct. Scale intercorrelations were all below 0.8, indicating an overall acceptable discriminant validity between the 7 dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the CFA analysis indicate that for almost all 7 eHLQ scales, an acceptable model fit was achieved. The 260 hospitalized patients included in this study represented a variety of diagnoses, recruited from a geographically limited area. Further studies on psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of eHLQ in larger samples, diverse settings and by using more comprehensive approaches are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10668391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106683912023-11-23 Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients Hermansen, Å. Andersen, M. H. Borge, C. R. Dahl, K. G. Larsen, M. H. Lønning, K. Meyer, K. B. Vidnes, T. K. Wahl, A. K. BMC Psychol Research AIMS: To perform the first psychometric analysis of the Norwegian version of the eHLQ using confirmative factor analysis (CFA) procedures in a population of patients admitted to hospital using a cross-sectional design. The eHLQ consists of 35 items capturing the 7-dimensional eHealth Literacy Framework (eHLF) which describes users' attributes, user's interaction with technologies and user's experience with digital health systems. METHODS: The 7 independent scales of the eHLQ was translated from Danish and culturally adapted into the Norwegian language following a standardised protocol. Assessment of construct validity of the eHLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 260 patients hospitalized at a Norwegian University Hospital in the Oslo area during a two-week period in June 2021. The analysis included using correlation analysis (Pearsons R), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: All factor loadings were high to acceptable (i.e. > 0.6), except for five items which had somewhat lower loadings. Regarding internal consistency, alpha ranged from 0.73 to 0.90. For optimal CFA fit for the different scale models, correlated residuals were required for five of the seven scales. Overall our analysis shows an intermediate fit of the orginal construct. Scale intercorrelations were all below 0.8, indicating an overall acceptable discriminant validity between the 7 dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the CFA analysis indicate that for almost all 7 eHLQ scales, an acceptable model fit was achieved. The 260 hospitalized patients included in this study represented a variety of diagnoses, recruited from a geographically limited area. Further studies on psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of eHLQ in larger samples, diverse settings and by using more comprehensive approaches are warranted. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10668391/ /pubmed/37996858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01449-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hermansen, Å. Andersen, M. H. Borge, C. R. Dahl, K. G. Larsen, M. H. Lønning, K. Meyer, K. B. Vidnes, T. K. Wahl, A. K. Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients |
title | Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients |
title_full | Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients |
title_fullStr | Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients |
title_short | Preliminary validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Norwegian hospitalized patients |
title_sort | preliminary validity testing of the ehealth literacy questionnaire (ehlq): a confirmatory factor analysis (cfa) in norwegian hospitalized patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01449-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hermansena preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT andersenmh preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT borgecr preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT dahlkg preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT larsenmh preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT lønningk preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT meyerkb preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT vidnestk preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients AT wahlak preliminaryvaliditytestingoftheehealthliteracyquestionnaireehlqaconfirmatoryfactoranalysiscfainnorwegianhospitalizedpatients |