Cargando…

The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND: A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ota, Kenji, Kodama, Hina, Kawamoto, Yasuhide, Sasaki, Daisuke, Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko, Sakamoto, Kei, Kosai, Kosuke, Hasegawa, Hiroo, Takazono, Takahiro, Izumikawa, Koichi, Mukae, Hiroshi, Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe, Morita, Kouichi, Yanagihara, Katsunori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9
_version_ 1785149133790642176
author Ota, Kenji
Kodama, Hina
Kawamoto, Yasuhide
Sasaki, Daisuke
Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko
Sakamoto, Kei
Kosai, Kosuke
Hasegawa, Hiroo
Takazono, Takahiro
Izumikawa, Koichi
Mukae, Hiroshi
Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe
Morita, Kouichi
Yanagihara, Katsunori
author_facet Ota, Kenji
Kodama, Hina
Kawamoto, Yasuhide
Sasaki, Daisuke
Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko
Sakamoto, Kei
Kosai, Kosuke
Hasegawa, Hiroo
Takazono, Takahiro
Izumikawa, Koichi
Mukae, Hiroshi
Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe
Morita, Kouichi
Yanagihara, Katsunori
author_sort Ota, Kenji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow antigen test shows low sensitivity and false negative results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (Lumira Ag), a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence method, in assessing infectivity. METHODS: This study was performed from March 2022 to July 2022. A pair of nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained from each patient with mild COVID-19. One swab was used for Lumira Ag testing, and the other for quantitative RT-PCR testing and virus culture. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. Among them, PCR, Lumira Ag test, and virus culture indicated positivity for 82, 66, and 24 patients, respectively. When comparing the Lumira Ag test to virus culture, its sensitivity was 100.0% (24/24), specificity, 30.0% (18/60); positive predictive value, 36.3% (24/66); and negative predictive value (NPV), 100.0% (18/18). The positive sample for virus culture was observed until the ninth day from the onset of symptoms, while the Lumira Ag test was observed until day 11. CONCLUSIONS: The Lumira Ag test showed high sensitivity and NPV (100% each) compared to virus culture. A test-based strategy using the Lumira Ag test can effectively exclude COVID-19 infectiousness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106684522023-11-23 The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients Ota, Kenji Kodama, Hina Kawamoto, Yasuhide Sasaki, Daisuke Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko Sakamoto, Kei Kosai, Kosuke Hasegawa, Hiroo Takazono, Takahiro Izumikawa, Koichi Mukae, Hiroshi Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe Morita, Kouichi Yanagihara, Katsunori BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow antigen test shows low sensitivity and false negative results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (Lumira Ag), a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence method, in assessing infectivity. METHODS: This study was performed from March 2022 to July 2022. A pair of nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained from each patient with mild COVID-19. One swab was used for Lumira Ag testing, and the other for quantitative RT-PCR testing and virus culture. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. Among them, PCR, Lumira Ag test, and virus culture indicated positivity for 82, 66, and 24 patients, respectively. When comparing the Lumira Ag test to virus culture, its sensitivity was 100.0% (24/24), specificity, 30.0% (18/60); positive predictive value, 36.3% (24/66); and negative predictive value (NPV), 100.0% (18/18). The positive sample for virus culture was observed until the ninth day from the onset of symptoms, while the Lumira Ag test was observed until day 11. CONCLUSIONS: The Lumira Ag test showed high sensitivity and NPV (100% each) compared to virus culture. A test-based strategy using the Lumira Ag test can effectively exclude COVID-19 infectiousness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10668452/ /pubmed/37996783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ota, Kenji
Kodama, Hina
Kawamoto, Yasuhide
Sasaki, Daisuke
Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko
Sakamoto, Kei
Kosai, Kosuke
Hasegawa, Hiroo
Takazono, Takahiro
Izumikawa, Koichi
Mukae, Hiroshi
Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe
Morita, Kouichi
Yanagihara, Katsunori
The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
title The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
title_full The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
title_fullStr The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
title_short The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
title_sort evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of covid-19 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9
work_keys_str_mv AT otakenji theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT kodamahina theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT kawamotoyasuhide theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT sasakidaisuke theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT mitsumotokaseidafujiko theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT sakamotokei theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT kosaikosuke theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT hasegawahiroo theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT takazonotakahiro theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT izumikawakoichi theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT mukaehiroshi theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT tunmyamyatngwe theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT moritakouichi theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT yanagiharakatsunori theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT otakenji evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT kodamahina evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT kawamotoyasuhide evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT sasakidaisuke evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT mitsumotokaseidafujiko evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT sakamotokei evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT kosaikosuke evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT hasegawahiroo evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT takazonotakahiro evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT izumikawakoichi evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT mukaehiroshi evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT tunmyamyatngwe evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT moritakouichi evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients
AT yanagiharakatsunori evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients