Cargando…
The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients
BACKGROUND: A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow ant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9 |
_version_ | 1785149133790642176 |
---|---|
author | Ota, Kenji Kodama, Hina Kawamoto, Yasuhide Sasaki, Daisuke Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko Sakamoto, Kei Kosai, Kosuke Hasegawa, Hiroo Takazono, Takahiro Izumikawa, Koichi Mukae, Hiroshi Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe Morita, Kouichi Yanagihara, Katsunori |
author_facet | Ota, Kenji Kodama, Hina Kawamoto, Yasuhide Sasaki, Daisuke Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko Sakamoto, Kei Kosai, Kosuke Hasegawa, Hiroo Takazono, Takahiro Izumikawa, Koichi Mukae, Hiroshi Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe Morita, Kouichi Yanagihara, Katsunori |
author_sort | Ota, Kenji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow antigen test shows low sensitivity and false negative results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (Lumira Ag), a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence method, in assessing infectivity. METHODS: This study was performed from March 2022 to July 2022. A pair of nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained from each patient with mild COVID-19. One swab was used for Lumira Ag testing, and the other for quantitative RT-PCR testing and virus culture. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. Among them, PCR, Lumira Ag test, and virus culture indicated positivity for 82, 66, and 24 patients, respectively. When comparing the Lumira Ag test to virus culture, its sensitivity was 100.0% (24/24), specificity, 30.0% (18/60); positive predictive value, 36.3% (24/66); and negative predictive value (NPV), 100.0% (18/18). The positive sample for virus culture was observed until the ninth day from the onset of symptoms, while the Lumira Ag test was observed until day 11. CONCLUSIONS: The Lumira Ag test showed high sensitivity and NPV (100% each) compared to virus culture. A test-based strategy using the Lumira Ag test can effectively exclude COVID-19 infectiousness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10668452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106684522023-11-23 The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients Ota, Kenji Kodama, Hina Kawamoto, Yasuhide Sasaki, Daisuke Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko Sakamoto, Kei Kosai, Kosuke Hasegawa, Hiroo Takazono, Takahiro Izumikawa, Koichi Mukae, Hiroshi Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe Morita, Kouichi Yanagihara, Katsunori BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow antigen test shows low sensitivity and false negative results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (Lumira Ag), a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence method, in assessing infectivity. METHODS: This study was performed from March 2022 to July 2022. A pair of nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained from each patient with mild COVID-19. One swab was used for Lumira Ag testing, and the other for quantitative RT-PCR testing and virus culture. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. Among them, PCR, Lumira Ag test, and virus culture indicated positivity for 82, 66, and 24 patients, respectively. When comparing the Lumira Ag test to virus culture, its sensitivity was 100.0% (24/24), specificity, 30.0% (18/60); positive predictive value, 36.3% (24/66); and negative predictive value (NPV), 100.0% (18/18). The positive sample for virus culture was observed until the ninth day from the onset of symptoms, while the Lumira Ag test was observed until day 11. CONCLUSIONS: The Lumira Ag test showed high sensitivity and NPV (100% each) compared to virus culture. A test-based strategy using the Lumira Ag test can effectively exclude COVID-19 infectiousness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10668452/ /pubmed/37996783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ota, Kenji Kodama, Hina Kawamoto, Yasuhide Sasaki, Daisuke Mitsumoto-Kaseida, Fujiko Sakamoto, Kei Kosai, Kosuke Hasegawa, Hiroo Takazono, Takahiro Izumikawa, Koichi Mukae, Hiroshi Tun, Mya Myat Ngwe Morita, Kouichi Yanagihara, Katsunori The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients |
title | The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients |
title_full | The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients |
title_short | The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients |
title_sort | evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of covid-19 patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT otakenji theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT kodamahina theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT kawamotoyasuhide theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT sasakidaisuke theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT mitsumotokaseidafujiko theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT sakamotokei theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT kosaikosuke theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT hasegawahiroo theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT takazonotakahiro theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT izumikawakoichi theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT mukaehiroshi theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT tunmyamyatngwe theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT moritakouichi theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT yanagiharakatsunori theevaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT otakenji evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT kodamahina evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT kawamotoyasuhide evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT sasakidaisuke evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT mitsumotokaseidafujiko evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT sakamotokei evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT kosaikosuke evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT hasegawahiroo evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT takazonotakahiro evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT izumikawakoichi evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT mukaehiroshi evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT tunmyamyatngwe evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT moritakouichi evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients AT yanagiharakatsunori evaluationofarapidmicrofluidicimmunofluorescenceantigentestindetectingtheinfectiousnessofcovid19patients |