Cargando…

An update on visual prosthesis

PURPOSE: To review the available evidence on the different retinal and visual prostheses for patients with retinitis pigmentosa and new implants for other indications including dry age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: The PubMed, GoogleScholar, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials databases were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramirez, Kailyn A., Drew-Bear, Laura E., Vega-Garces, Maria, Betancourt-Belandria, Henry, Arevalo, J. Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00498-1
_version_ 1785149139183468544
author Ramirez, Kailyn A.
Drew-Bear, Laura E.
Vega-Garces, Maria
Betancourt-Belandria, Henry
Arevalo, J. Fernando
author_facet Ramirez, Kailyn A.
Drew-Bear, Laura E.
Vega-Garces, Maria
Betancourt-Belandria, Henry
Arevalo, J. Fernando
author_sort Ramirez, Kailyn A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To review the available evidence on the different retinal and visual prostheses for patients with retinitis pigmentosa and new implants for other indications including dry age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: The PubMed, GoogleScholar, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials databases were the main resources used to conduct the medical literature search. An extensive search was performed to identify relevant articles concerning the worldwide advances in retinal prosthesis, clinical trials, status of devices and potential future directions up to December 2022. RESULTS: Thirteen devices were found to be current and were ordered by stimulation location. Six have active clinical trials. Four have been discontinued, including the Alpha IMS, Alpha AMS, IRIS II, and ARGUS II which had FDA and CE mark approval. Future directions will be presented in the review. CONCLUSION: This review provides an update of retinal prosthetic devices, both current and discontinued. While some devices have achieved visual perception in animals and/or humans, the main issues impeding the commercialization of these devices include: increased length of time to observe outcomes, difficulties in finding validated meaures for use in studies, unknown long-term effects, lack of funding, and a low amount of patients simultaneously diagnosed with RP lacking other comorbid conditions. The ARGUS II did get FDA and CE mark approval so it was deemed safe and also effective. However, the company became more focused on a visual cortical implant. Future efforts are headed towards more biocompatible, safe, and efficacious devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106684752023-11-23 An update on visual prosthesis Ramirez, Kailyn A. Drew-Bear, Laura E. Vega-Garces, Maria Betancourt-Belandria, Henry Arevalo, J. Fernando Int J Retina Vitreous Review PURPOSE: To review the available evidence on the different retinal and visual prostheses for patients with retinitis pigmentosa and new implants for other indications including dry age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: The PubMed, GoogleScholar, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials databases were the main resources used to conduct the medical literature search. An extensive search was performed to identify relevant articles concerning the worldwide advances in retinal prosthesis, clinical trials, status of devices and potential future directions up to December 2022. RESULTS: Thirteen devices were found to be current and were ordered by stimulation location. Six have active clinical trials. Four have been discontinued, including the Alpha IMS, Alpha AMS, IRIS II, and ARGUS II which had FDA and CE mark approval. Future directions will be presented in the review. CONCLUSION: This review provides an update of retinal prosthetic devices, both current and discontinued. While some devices have achieved visual perception in animals and/or humans, the main issues impeding the commercialization of these devices include: increased length of time to observe outcomes, difficulties in finding validated meaures for use in studies, unknown long-term effects, lack of funding, and a low amount of patients simultaneously diagnosed with RP lacking other comorbid conditions. The ARGUS II did get FDA and CE mark approval so it was deemed safe and also effective. However, the company became more focused on a visual cortical implant. Future efforts are headed towards more biocompatible, safe, and efficacious devices. BioMed Central 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10668475/ /pubmed/37996905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00498-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Ramirez, Kailyn A.
Drew-Bear, Laura E.
Vega-Garces, Maria
Betancourt-Belandria, Henry
Arevalo, J. Fernando
An update on visual prosthesis
title An update on visual prosthesis
title_full An update on visual prosthesis
title_fullStr An update on visual prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed An update on visual prosthesis
title_short An update on visual prosthesis
title_sort update on visual prosthesis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37996905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00498-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezkailyna anupdateonvisualprosthesis
AT drewbearlaurae anupdateonvisualprosthesis
AT vegagarcesmaria anupdateonvisualprosthesis
AT betancourtbelandriahenry anupdateonvisualprosthesis
AT arevalojfernando anupdateonvisualprosthesis
AT ramirezkailyna updateonvisualprosthesis
AT drewbearlaurae updateonvisualprosthesis
AT vegagarcesmaria updateonvisualprosthesis
AT betancourtbelandriahenry updateonvisualprosthesis
AT arevalojfernando updateonvisualprosthesis