Cargando…

Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level

Claims of “gender symmetry” in intimate partner violence (IPV) prevalence are contested, with resolution of the issue complicated by methodological and measurement challenges. This study explores gendered differences in the distribution of IPV exposure at the population-level, considering multiple t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanslow, Janet L., Mellar, Brooklyn M., Gulliver, Pauline J., McIntosh, Tracey K. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37032556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605231163646
_version_ 1785149152339951616
author Fanslow, Janet L.
Mellar, Brooklyn M.
Gulliver, Pauline J.
McIntosh, Tracey K. D.
author_facet Fanslow, Janet L.
Mellar, Brooklyn M.
Gulliver, Pauline J.
McIntosh, Tracey K. D.
author_sort Fanslow, Janet L.
collection PubMed
description Claims of “gender symmetry” in intimate partner violence (IPV) prevalence are contested, with resolution of the issue complicated by methodological and measurement challenges. This study explores gendered differences in the distribution of IPV exposure at the population-level, considering multiple types of IPV exposure. The subjects comprised of 1,431 ever-partnered women and 1,355 ever-partnered men. Data from a nationally representative population-based cross-sectional survey were used to compare men and women’s IPV experiences. Twenty-three IPV acts were assessed across IPV types (moderate physical, severe physical, sexual, psychological, controlling behaviors, economic). Proportions were presented by gender for the number of individual IPV acts experienced per IPV type, and the frequency of these acts (none, once, few times, or many times). A composite exposure score was developed to assess the number of acts and their frequency within types by comparing scores in tertiles and across types by correlations. Women reported greater overall prevalence of 20 of the 23 individual IPV acts assessed. Across all assessed acts, women comprised a substantially greater proportion of those who reported experiencing individual acts “many times.” Women experienced more severe and more frequent IPV than men based on self-reported experience of IPV acts, and by the frequency with which acts were experienced. Significant differences between men and women’s exposure scores were observed for all six assessed types, with greater proportions of women scoring in the upper tertiles. This study provides evidence of gender asymmetry in experiences of IPV at the population level. While men do experience IPV victimization, there remains need for directed and substantial resource allocation for intervention and therapeutic responses to women’s exposure to IPV, and for primary prevention with men. Going forward, IPV measurement tools that consider frequency, severity, or co-occurring types of IPV are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106685412023-11-24 Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level Fanslow, Janet L. Mellar, Brooklyn M. Gulliver, Pauline J. McIntosh, Tracey K. D. J Interpers Violence Original Articles Claims of “gender symmetry” in intimate partner violence (IPV) prevalence are contested, with resolution of the issue complicated by methodological and measurement challenges. This study explores gendered differences in the distribution of IPV exposure at the population-level, considering multiple types of IPV exposure. The subjects comprised of 1,431 ever-partnered women and 1,355 ever-partnered men. Data from a nationally representative population-based cross-sectional survey were used to compare men and women’s IPV experiences. Twenty-three IPV acts were assessed across IPV types (moderate physical, severe physical, sexual, psychological, controlling behaviors, economic). Proportions were presented by gender for the number of individual IPV acts experienced per IPV type, and the frequency of these acts (none, once, few times, or many times). A composite exposure score was developed to assess the number of acts and their frequency within types by comparing scores in tertiles and across types by correlations. Women reported greater overall prevalence of 20 of the 23 individual IPV acts assessed. Across all assessed acts, women comprised a substantially greater proportion of those who reported experiencing individual acts “many times.” Women experienced more severe and more frequent IPV than men based on self-reported experience of IPV acts, and by the frequency with which acts were experienced. Significant differences between men and women’s exposure scores were observed for all six assessed types, with greater proportions of women scoring in the upper tertiles. This study provides evidence of gender asymmetry in experiences of IPV at the population level. While men do experience IPV victimization, there remains need for directed and substantial resource allocation for intervention and therapeutic responses to women’s exposure to IPV, and for primary prevention with men. Going forward, IPV measurement tools that consider frequency, severity, or co-occurring types of IPV are needed. SAGE Publications 2023-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10668541/ /pubmed/37032556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605231163646 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fanslow, Janet L.
Mellar, Brooklyn M.
Gulliver, Pauline J.
McIntosh, Tracey K. D.
Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level
title Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level
title_full Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level
title_fullStr Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level
title_short Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level
title_sort evidence of gender asymmetry in intimate partner violence experience at the population-level
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37032556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605231163646
work_keys_str_mv AT fanslowjanetl evidenceofgenderasymmetryinintimatepartnerviolenceexperienceatthepopulationlevel
AT mellarbrooklynm evidenceofgenderasymmetryinintimatepartnerviolenceexperienceatthepopulationlevel
AT gulliverpaulinej evidenceofgenderasymmetryinintimatepartnerviolenceexperienceatthepopulationlevel
AT mcintoshtraceykd evidenceofgenderasymmetryinintimatepartnerviolenceexperienceatthepopulationlevel