Cargando…
Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The number of revision knee arthroplasties (rTKA) is growing significantly as is the use of intramedullary stems for optimized stability. The choice of the most appropriate stem fixation method is still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare cemented versus cementless stem fi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37998836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111633 |
_version_ | 1785149185841954816 |
---|---|
author | Darwich, Ali Jovanovic, Andrea Dally, Franz-Joseph Abd El Hai, Asseel Baumgärtner, Tobias Assaf, Elio Gravius, Sascha Hetjens, Svetlana Bdeir, Mohamad |
author_facet | Darwich, Ali Jovanovic, Andrea Dally, Franz-Joseph Abd El Hai, Asseel Baumgärtner, Tobias Assaf, Elio Gravius, Sascha Hetjens, Svetlana Bdeir, Mohamad |
author_sort | Darwich, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | The number of revision knee arthroplasties (rTKA) is growing significantly as is the use of intramedullary stems for optimized stability. The choice of the most appropriate stem fixation method is still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare cemented versus cementless stem fixation in rTKA. Publications with patients undergoing rTKA with a follow-up > 24 months were systemically reviewed. Extracted parameters included total revision and failure rates for any reason, incidence of aseptic loosening, periprosthetic infection, and radiolucent lines, as well as the clinical outcome. A statistical regression analysis was then performed on all extracted clinical and radiological outcome data. A total of 35 publications met the inclusion criteria and were included and analyzed. Overall, 14/35 publications compared cementless versus cemented stem fixation, whereas 21/35 publications investigated only one stem fixation method. There were no significant differences in revision (p = 0.2613) or failure rates (p = 0.3559) and no differences in the incidence of aseptic loosening (p = 0.3999) or periprosthetic infection (p = 0.1010). The incidence of radiolucent lines was significantly higher in patients with cemented stems (26.2% versus 18.6%, p < 0.0001). However, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed. No superiority of a specific stem fixation method in rTKA was found. Rates of revision or failure for any reason as well as incidence of aseptic loosening and periprosthetic infection in cemented versus cementless stem fixation showed no significant difference. A higher incidence of radiolucent lines was observed in cemented stem fixation; however, no effect was observed on the clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10668853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106688532023-11-17 Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Darwich, Ali Jovanovic, Andrea Dally, Franz-Joseph Abd El Hai, Asseel Baumgärtner, Tobias Assaf, Elio Gravius, Sascha Hetjens, Svetlana Bdeir, Mohamad Antibiotics (Basel) Systematic Review The number of revision knee arthroplasties (rTKA) is growing significantly as is the use of intramedullary stems for optimized stability. The choice of the most appropriate stem fixation method is still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare cemented versus cementless stem fixation in rTKA. Publications with patients undergoing rTKA with a follow-up > 24 months were systemically reviewed. Extracted parameters included total revision and failure rates for any reason, incidence of aseptic loosening, periprosthetic infection, and radiolucent lines, as well as the clinical outcome. A statistical regression analysis was then performed on all extracted clinical and radiological outcome data. A total of 35 publications met the inclusion criteria and were included and analyzed. Overall, 14/35 publications compared cementless versus cemented stem fixation, whereas 21/35 publications investigated only one stem fixation method. There were no significant differences in revision (p = 0.2613) or failure rates (p = 0.3559) and no differences in the incidence of aseptic loosening (p = 0.3999) or periprosthetic infection (p = 0.1010). The incidence of radiolucent lines was significantly higher in patients with cemented stems (26.2% versus 18.6%, p < 0.0001). However, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed. No superiority of a specific stem fixation method in rTKA was found. Rates of revision or failure for any reason as well as incidence of aseptic loosening and periprosthetic infection in cemented versus cementless stem fixation showed no significant difference. A higher incidence of radiolucent lines was observed in cemented stem fixation; however, no effect was observed on the clinical outcome. MDPI 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10668853/ /pubmed/37998836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111633 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Darwich, Ali Jovanovic, Andrea Dally, Franz-Joseph Abd El Hai, Asseel Baumgärtner, Tobias Assaf, Elio Gravius, Sascha Hetjens, Svetlana Bdeir, Mohamad Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | cemented versus cementless stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37998836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darwichali cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jovanovicandrea cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dallyfranzjoseph cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abdelhaiasseel cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baumgartnertobias cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT assafelio cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT graviussascha cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hetjenssvetlana cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bdeirmohamad cementedversuscementlessstemfixationinrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |