Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children

Background The most exasperating aspect for pediatric patients in a dental setup is the fear and anxiety caused by injections, called "blenophobia". There are numerous local anesthetic agents available to reduce the needle prick pain. Taking into consideration the paradigm shift, there is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deulkar, Pranjali V, Rathi, Nilesh V, Thosar, Nilima, Bane, Sphurti P, Deshpande, Meghana A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021496
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47652
_version_ 1785139569705877504
author Deulkar, Pranjali V
Rathi, Nilesh V
Thosar, Nilima
Bane, Sphurti P
Deshpande, Meghana A
author_facet Deulkar, Pranjali V
Rathi, Nilesh V
Thosar, Nilima
Bane, Sphurti P
Deshpande, Meghana A
author_sort Deulkar, Pranjali V
collection PubMed
description Background The most exasperating aspect for pediatric patients in a dental setup is the fear and anxiety caused by injections, called "blenophobia". There are numerous local anesthetic agents available to reduce the needle prick pain. Taking into consideration the paradigm shift, there is always a possibility for alternate treatment options. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) application through an electronic acupuncture pen (Meridian Energy Acupuncture Pen W-912 GENERIC) and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children. Method Patients aged 6 to 12 years were eligible for inclusion. The topical anesthetic agents were administered to the patients in a bilateral split-mouth technique. In Group A, 2% topical anesthetic gel was administered on the first visit on one side of the mandible and topical anesthesia through the electronic acupuncture pen was administered on the next visit, on the opposite side of the mandible. The electronic acupuncture pen was applied on one side of the mandible on the first visit, and on the next appointment, 2% topical anesthetic gel on the other side was administered in Group B. Sound, eye, motor scale (SEM) and faces pain scale-Revised (FPS) were used as tools of evaluation after local anesthesia was administered.  Results  The comparison between electronic acupuncture pen and 2% lignocaine gel using the SEM scale shows a statistically insignificant difference (p-value = 0.082). Similarly, a comparison of FPS values between both groups indicates no significant difference (p-value = 0.582). However, results show a reduced pain perception in both groups. Conclusion Topical anesthetic agents are commonly used to reduce needle prick pain in children. TENS through the electronic acupuncture pen, a revisited aid in scientific research, has proved its efficacy as a topical pain reduction measure during dental treatment. This device overcomes the shortcomings of the anesthetic gels and also nullifies the chances of overdosage, hypersensitivity, and disagreeable taste. Thus, this tool can be used in dental practice for the management of pain in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106688902023-10-25 Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children Deulkar, Pranjali V Rathi, Nilesh V Thosar, Nilima Bane, Sphurti P Deshpande, Meghana A Cureus Dentistry Background The most exasperating aspect for pediatric patients in a dental setup is the fear and anxiety caused by injections, called "blenophobia". There are numerous local anesthetic agents available to reduce the needle prick pain. Taking into consideration the paradigm shift, there is always a possibility for alternate treatment options. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) application through an electronic acupuncture pen (Meridian Energy Acupuncture Pen W-912 GENERIC) and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children. Method Patients aged 6 to 12 years were eligible for inclusion. The topical anesthetic agents were administered to the patients in a bilateral split-mouth technique. In Group A, 2% topical anesthetic gel was administered on the first visit on one side of the mandible and topical anesthesia through the electronic acupuncture pen was administered on the next visit, on the opposite side of the mandible. The electronic acupuncture pen was applied on one side of the mandible on the first visit, and on the next appointment, 2% topical anesthetic gel on the other side was administered in Group B. Sound, eye, motor scale (SEM) and faces pain scale-Revised (FPS) were used as tools of evaluation after local anesthesia was administered.  Results  The comparison between electronic acupuncture pen and 2% lignocaine gel using the SEM scale shows a statistically insignificant difference (p-value = 0.082). Similarly, a comparison of FPS values between both groups indicates no significant difference (p-value = 0.582). However, results show a reduced pain perception in both groups. Conclusion Topical anesthetic agents are commonly used to reduce needle prick pain in children. TENS through the electronic acupuncture pen, a revisited aid in scientific research, has proved its efficacy as a topical pain reduction measure during dental treatment. This device overcomes the shortcomings of the anesthetic gels and also nullifies the chances of overdosage, hypersensitivity, and disagreeable taste. Thus, this tool can be used in dental practice for the management of pain in children. Cureus 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10668890/ /pubmed/38021496 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47652 Text en Copyright © 2023, Deulkar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Deulkar, Pranjali V
Rathi, Nilesh V
Thosar, Nilima
Bane, Sphurti P
Deshpande, Meghana A
Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children
title Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Acupuncture Pen and 2% Lignocaine Gel as an Intraoral Topical Anesthetic Agent in Children
title_sort comparative evaluation of electronic acupuncture pen and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021496
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47652
work_keys_str_mv AT deulkarpranjaliv comparativeevaluationofelectronicacupuncturepenand2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildren
AT rathinileshv comparativeevaluationofelectronicacupuncturepenand2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildren
AT thosarnilima comparativeevaluationofelectronicacupuncturepenand2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildren
AT banesphurtip comparativeevaluationofelectronicacupuncturepenand2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildren
AT deshpandemeghanaa comparativeevaluationofelectronicacupuncturepenand2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildren