Cargando…

Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint

An intricate and unique combination of ligamentous, fibrocartilaginous, and osseous structures stabilize the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. Both ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging are extremely useful in evaluating these critical structures. This article reviews common injur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knisely, Beatrice, Noland, Shelley S., Melville, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020517
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0030
_version_ 1785149191544111104
author Knisely, Beatrice
Noland, Shelley S.
Melville, David M.
author_facet Knisely, Beatrice
Noland, Shelley S.
Melville, David M.
author_sort Knisely, Beatrice
collection PubMed
description An intricate and unique combination of ligamentous, fibrocartilaginous, and osseous structures stabilize the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. Both ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging are extremely useful in evaluating these critical structures. This article reviews common injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint, while highlighting the merits, limitations, and pitfalls of the two imaging modalities. A clear appreciation of each method, paired with anatomic knowledge, will lend greater confidence and accuracy to diagnosing impactful injuries and guiding intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10668926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106689262023-11-23 Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint Knisely, Beatrice Noland, Shelley S. Melville, David M. J Ultrason Review Paper An intricate and unique combination of ligamentous, fibrocartilaginous, and osseous structures stabilize the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. Both ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging are extremely useful in evaluating these critical structures. This article reviews common injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint, while highlighting the merits, limitations, and pitfalls of the two imaging modalities. A clear appreciation of each method, paired with anatomic knowledge, will lend greater confidence and accuracy to diagnosing impactful injuries and guiding intervention. Sciendo 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10668926/ /pubmed/38020517 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0030 Text en © 2023 Beatrice Knisely et al., published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Knisely, Beatrice
Noland, Shelley S.
Melville, David M.
Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
title Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
title_full Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
title_fullStr Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
title_short Ultrasound versus MRI in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
title_sort ultrasound versus mri in the evaluation of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10668926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020517
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0030
work_keys_str_mv AT kniselybeatrice ultrasoundversusmriintheevaluationofthethumbmetacarpophalangealjoint
AT nolandshelleys ultrasoundversusmriintheevaluationofthethumbmetacarpophalangealjoint
AT melvilledavidm ultrasoundversusmriintheevaluationofthethumbmetacarpophalangealjoint