Cargando…

The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex

Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantovic, Milan, Boss, Rhett, Noorda, Kevin J., Premyanov, Mario I., Aynlender, Daniel G., Wilkins, Erik W., Boss, Sage, Riley, Zachary A., Poston, Brach
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111278
_version_ 1785139635043696640
author Pantovic, Milan
Boss, Rhett
Noorda, Kevin J.
Premyanov, Mario I.
Aynlender, Daniel G.
Wilkins, Erik W.
Boss, Sage
Riley, Zachary A.
Poston, Brach
author_facet Pantovic, Milan
Boss, Rhett
Noorda, Kevin J.
Premyanov, Mario I.
Aynlender, Daniel G.
Wilkins, Erik W.
Boss, Sage
Riley, Zachary A.
Poston, Brach
author_sort Pantovic, Milan
collection PubMed
description Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to optimize ICF quantification have been established. However, the underappreciated methodological issue of the time between ICF trials (inter-trial interval; ITI) has been unstandardized, and different ITIs have never been compared in a paired-pulse TMS study. This is important because single-pulse TMS studies have found motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reductions over time during TMS trial blocks for short, but not long ITIs. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of different ITIs on the measurement of ICF. Twenty adults completed one experimental session that involved 4 separate ICF trial blocks with each utilizing a different ITI (4, 6, 8, and 10 s). Two-way ANOVAs indicated no significant ITI main effects for test MEP amplitudes, condition-test MEP amplitudes, and therefore ICF. Accordingly, all ITIs studied provided nearly identical ICF values when averaged over entire trial blocks. Therefore, it is recommended that ITIs of 4–6 s be utilized for ICF quantification to optimize participant comfort and experiment time efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10669180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106691802023-11-02 The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex Pantovic, Milan Boss, Rhett Noorda, Kevin J. Premyanov, Mario I. Aynlender, Daniel G. Wilkins, Erik W. Boss, Sage Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach Bioengineering (Basel) Article Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to optimize ICF quantification have been established. However, the underappreciated methodological issue of the time between ICF trials (inter-trial interval; ITI) has been unstandardized, and different ITIs have never been compared in a paired-pulse TMS study. This is important because single-pulse TMS studies have found motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reductions over time during TMS trial blocks for short, but not long ITIs. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of different ITIs on the measurement of ICF. Twenty adults completed one experimental session that involved 4 separate ICF trial blocks with each utilizing a different ITI (4, 6, 8, and 10 s). Two-way ANOVAs indicated no significant ITI main effects for test MEP amplitudes, condition-test MEP amplitudes, and therefore ICF. Accordingly, all ITIs studied provided nearly identical ICF values when averaged over entire trial blocks. Therefore, it is recommended that ITIs of 4–6 s be utilized for ICF quantification to optimize participant comfort and experiment time efficiency. MDPI 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10669180/ /pubmed/38002401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111278 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pantovic, Milan
Boss, Rhett
Noorda, Kevin J.
Premyanov, Mario I.
Aynlender, Daniel G.
Wilkins, Erik W.
Boss, Sage
Riley, Zachary A.
Poston, Brach
The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
title The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
title_full The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
title_fullStr The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
title_short The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
title_sort influence of different inter-trial intervals on the quantification of intracortical facilitation in the primary motor cortex
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111278
work_keys_str_mv AT pantovicmilan theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT bossrhett theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT noordakevinj theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT premyanovmarioi theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT aynlenderdanielg theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT wilkinserikw theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT bosssage theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT rileyzacharya theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT postonbrach theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT pantovicmilan influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT bossrhett influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT noordakevinj influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT premyanovmarioi influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT aynlenderdanielg influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT wilkinserikw influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT bosssage influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT rileyzacharya influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex
AT postonbrach influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex