Cargando…
The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to opti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111278 |
_version_ | 1785139635043696640 |
---|---|
author | Pantovic, Milan Boss, Rhett Noorda, Kevin J. Premyanov, Mario I. Aynlender, Daniel G. Wilkins, Erik W. Boss, Sage Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach |
author_facet | Pantovic, Milan Boss, Rhett Noorda, Kevin J. Premyanov, Mario I. Aynlender, Daniel G. Wilkins, Erik W. Boss, Sage Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach |
author_sort | Pantovic, Milan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to optimize ICF quantification have been established. However, the underappreciated methodological issue of the time between ICF trials (inter-trial interval; ITI) has been unstandardized, and different ITIs have never been compared in a paired-pulse TMS study. This is important because single-pulse TMS studies have found motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reductions over time during TMS trial blocks for short, but not long ITIs. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of different ITIs on the measurement of ICF. Twenty adults completed one experimental session that involved 4 separate ICF trial blocks with each utilizing a different ITI (4, 6, 8, and 10 s). Two-way ANOVAs indicated no significant ITI main effects for test MEP amplitudes, condition-test MEP amplitudes, and therefore ICF. Accordingly, all ITIs studied provided nearly identical ICF values when averaged over entire trial blocks. Therefore, it is recommended that ITIs of 4–6 s be utilized for ICF quantification to optimize participant comfort and experiment time efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10669180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106691802023-11-02 The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex Pantovic, Milan Boss, Rhett Noorda, Kevin J. Premyanov, Mario I. Aynlender, Daniel G. Wilkins, Erik W. Boss, Sage Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach Bioengineering (Basel) Article Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to optimize ICF quantification have been established. However, the underappreciated methodological issue of the time between ICF trials (inter-trial interval; ITI) has been unstandardized, and different ITIs have never been compared in a paired-pulse TMS study. This is important because single-pulse TMS studies have found motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reductions over time during TMS trial blocks for short, but not long ITIs. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of different ITIs on the measurement of ICF. Twenty adults completed one experimental session that involved 4 separate ICF trial blocks with each utilizing a different ITI (4, 6, 8, and 10 s). Two-way ANOVAs indicated no significant ITI main effects for test MEP amplitudes, condition-test MEP amplitudes, and therefore ICF. Accordingly, all ITIs studied provided nearly identical ICF values when averaged over entire trial blocks. Therefore, it is recommended that ITIs of 4–6 s be utilized for ICF quantification to optimize participant comfort and experiment time efficiency. MDPI 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10669180/ /pubmed/38002401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111278 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pantovic, Milan Boss, Rhett Noorda, Kevin J. Premyanov, Mario I. Aynlender, Daniel G. Wilkins, Erik W. Boss, Sage Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex |
title | The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex |
title_full | The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex |
title_short | The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex |
title_sort | influence of different inter-trial intervals on the quantification of intracortical facilitation in the primary motor cortex |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pantovicmilan theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT bossrhett theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT noordakevinj theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT premyanovmarioi theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT aynlenderdanielg theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT wilkinserikw theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT bosssage theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT rileyzacharya theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT postonbrach theinfluenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT pantovicmilan influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT bossrhett influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT noordakevinj influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT premyanovmarioi influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT aynlenderdanielg influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT wilkinserikw influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT bosssage influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT rileyzacharya influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex AT postonbrach influenceofdifferentintertrialintervalsonthequantificationofintracorticalfacilitationintheprimarymotorcortex |