Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification
In recent decades, the incidence of melanoma has grown rapidly. Hence, early diagnosis is crucial to improving clinical outcomes. Here, we propose and compare a classical image analysis-based machine learning method with a deep learning one to automatically classify benign vs. malignant dermoscopic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111322 |
_version_ | 1785149240964546560 |
---|---|
author | Brutti, Francesca La Rosa, Federica Lazzeri, Linda Benvenuti, Chiara Bagnoni, Giovanni Massi, Daniela Laurino, Marco |
author_facet | Brutti, Francesca La Rosa, Federica Lazzeri, Linda Benvenuti, Chiara Bagnoni, Giovanni Massi, Daniela Laurino, Marco |
author_sort | Brutti, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent decades, the incidence of melanoma has grown rapidly. Hence, early diagnosis is crucial to improving clinical outcomes. Here, we propose and compare a classical image analysis-based machine learning method with a deep learning one to automatically classify benign vs. malignant dermoscopic skin lesion images. The same dataset of 25,122 publicly available dermoscopic images was used to train both models, while a disjointed test set of 200 images was used for the evaluation phase. The training dataset was randomly divided into 10 datasets of 19,932 images to obtain an equal distribution between the two classes. By testing both models on the disjoint set, the deep learning-based method returned accuracy of 85.4 ± 3.2% and specificity of 75.5 ± 7.6%, while the machine learning one showed accuracy and specificity of 73.8 ± 1.1% and 44.5 ± 4.7%, respectively. Although both approaches performed well in the validation phase, the convolutional neural network outperformed the ensemble boosted tree classifier on the disjoint test set, showing better generalization ability. The integration of new melanoma detection algorithms with digital dermoscopic devices could enable a faster screening of the population, improve patient management, and achieve better survival rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10669580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106695802023-11-16 Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification Brutti, Francesca La Rosa, Federica Lazzeri, Linda Benvenuti, Chiara Bagnoni, Giovanni Massi, Daniela Laurino, Marco Bioengineering (Basel) Article In recent decades, the incidence of melanoma has grown rapidly. Hence, early diagnosis is crucial to improving clinical outcomes. Here, we propose and compare a classical image analysis-based machine learning method with a deep learning one to automatically classify benign vs. malignant dermoscopic skin lesion images. The same dataset of 25,122 publicly available dermoscopic images was used to train both models, while a disjointed test set of 200 images was used for the evaluation phase. The training dataset was randomly divided into 10 datasets of 19,932 images to obtain an equal distribution between the two classes. By testing both models on the disjoint set, the deep learning-based method returned accuracy of 85.4 ± 3.2% and specificity of 75.5 ± 7.6%, while the machine learning one showed accuracy and specificity of 73.8 ± 1.1% and 44.5 ± 4.7%, respectively. Although both approaches performed well in the validation phase, the convolutional neural network outperformed the ensemble boosted tree classifier on the disjoint test set, showing better generalization ability. The integration of new melanoma detection algorithms with digital dermoscopic devices could enable a faster screening of the population, improve patient management, and achieve better survival rates. MDPI 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10669580/ /pubmed/38002446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111322 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brutti, Francesca La Rosa, Federica Lazzeri, Linda Benvenuti, Chiara Bagnoni, Giovanni Massi, Daniela Laurino, Marco Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification |
title | Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Benign vs. Malignant Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Image Classification |
title_sort | artificial intelligence algorithms for benign vs. malignant dermoscopic skin lesion image classification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10111322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruttifrancesca artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification AT larosafederica artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification AT lazzerilinda artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification AT benvenutichiara artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification AT bagnonigiovanni artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification AT massidaniela artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification AT laurinomarco artificialintelligencealgorithmsforbenignvsmalignantdermoscopicskinlesionimageclassification |