Cargando…

A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the course of visual acuity (VA) in visual outcomes of patients treated with iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy in our center, based on original VA before treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visual acuity was prospectively assessed using a case series of 305...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miguel, David, de Frutos, Jesús María, Alonso, Pilar, García-Álvarez, Ciro, Saornil, María Antonia, Diezhandino, Patricia, Garavis, Maria Isabel, Valencia, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026075
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.132658
_version_ 1785139805060857856
author Miguel, David
de Frutos, Jesús María
Alonso, Pilar
García-Álvarez, Ciro
Saornil, María Antonia
Diezhandino, Patricia
Garavis, Maria Isabel
Valencia, Patricia
author_facet Miguel, David
de Frutos, Jesús María
Alonso, Pilar
García-Álvarez, Ciro
Saornil, María Antonia
Diezhandino, Patricia
Garavis, Maria Isabel
Valencia, Patricia
author_sort Miguel, David
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the course of visual acuity (VA) in visual outcomes of patients treated with iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy in our center, based on original VA before treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visual acuity was prospectively assessed using a case series of 305 patients treated with (125)I between 1996 and 2022. To examine how VA behaves over time, we divided patient sample into 4 groups: (1) Patients with visual acuity of less than V ≤ 0.1 at baseline; (2) Patients with low to moderate VA, ranging 0.1 < V < 0.4; (3) Patients with moderate-high VA, ranging 0.4 < V < 0.8; (4) Patients with very high VA of V > 0.8. Each of the four groups was studied separately over a 60-month period to determine the percentage of patients with VA improvement, worsening, or with the same VA status. Finally, visual outcomes over time were estimated with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and VA maintenance rates were reported at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 78.2 months (range, 6-254 months). The cumulative probabilities of survival analysis at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 16%, 3%, 2%, and none for the first sub-group; 46%, 20%, 17%, and 14% for the second; 65%, 53%, 29%, and 15% for the third; and 86%, 56%, 48%, and 41% for the fourth sub-group. The median survival in years was 0.30, 0.80, 3.10, and 4.40 for each sub-cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease and maintenance of VA depends on the initial VA of patients. Most patients experience a marked worsening of their VA, regardless of their VA status before treatment with episcleral brachytherapy. Patients with a higher baseline VA retain VA best over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10669921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106699212023-10-01 A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma Miguel, David de Frutos, Jesús María Alonso, Pilar García-Álvarez, Ciro Saornil, María Antonia Diezhandino, Patricia Garavis, Maria Isabel Valencia, Patricia J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the course of visual acuity (VA) in visual outcomes of patients treated with iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy in our center, based on original VA before treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visual acuity was prospectively assessed using a case series of 305 patients treated with (125)I between 1996 and 2022. To examine how VA behaves over time, we divided patient sample into 4 groups: (1) Patients with visual acuity of less than V ≤ 0.1 at baseline; (2) Patients with low to moderate VA, ranging 0.1 < V < 0.4; (3) Patients with moderate-high VA, ranging 0.4 < V < 0.8; (4) Patients with very high VA of V > 0.8. Each of the four groups was studied separately over a 60-month period to determine the percentage of patients with VA improvement, worsening, or with the same VA status. Finally, visual outcomes over time were estimated with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and VA maintenance rates were reported at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 78.2 months (range, 6-254 months). The cumulative probabilities of survival analysis at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 16%, 3%, 2%, and none for the first sub-group; 46%, 20%, 17%, and 14% for the second; 65%, 53%, 29%, and 15% for the third; and 86%, 56%, 48%, and 41% for the fourth sub-group. The median survival in years was 0.30, 0.80, 3.10, and 4.40 for each sub-cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease and maintenance of VA depends on the initial VA of patients. Most patients experience a marked worsening of their VA, regardless of their VA status before treatment with episcleral brachytherapy. Patients with a higher baseline VA retain VA best over time. Termedia Publishing House 2023-10-31 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10669921/ /pubmed/38026075 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.132658 Text en Copyright © 2023 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Miguel, David
de Frutos, Jesús María
Alonso, Pilar
García-Álvarez, Ciro
Saornil, María Antonia
Diezhandino, Patricia
Garavis, Maria Isabel
Valencia, Patricia
A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
title A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
title_full A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
title_fullStr A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
title_full_unstemmed A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
title_short A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
title_sort study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026075
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.132658
work_keys_str_mv AT migueldavid astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT defrutosjesusmaria astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT alonsopilar astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT garciaalvarezciro astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT saornilmariaantonia astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT diezhandinopatricia astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT garavismariaisabel astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT valenciapatricia astudycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT migueldavid studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT defrutosjesusmaria studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT alonsopilar studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT garciaalvarezciro studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT saornilmariaantonia studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT diezhandinopatricia studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT garavismariaisabel studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma
AT valenciapatricia studycomparingbaselineandbestcorrectedvisualacuityafteriodine125episcleralbrachytherapyinuvealmelanoma