Cargando…

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Pancreatic tumours usually require surgical removal. With advancing technology, these operations can be performed using laparoscopic and robotic techniques, which reduce surgical trauma to patients compared to conventional open surgery. In theory, robotic surgery should yield better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Hao, Kawka, Michal, Gall, Tamara M. H., Wadsworth, Chris, Habib, Nagy, Nicol, David, Cunningham, David, Jiao, Long R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225492
_version_ 1785149262984642560
author Ding, Hao
Kawka, Michal
Gall, Tamara M. H.
Wadsworth, Chris
Habib, Nagy
Nicol, David
Cunningham, David
Jiao, Long R.
author_facet Ding, Hao
Kawka, Michal
Gall, Tamara M. H.
Wadsworth, Chris
Habib, Nagy
Nicol, David
Cunningham, David
Jiao, Long R.
author_sort Ding, Hao
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Pancreatic tumours usually require surgical removal. With advancing technology, these operations can be performed using laparoscopic and robotic techniques, which reduce surgical trauma to patients compared to conventional open surgery. In theory, robotic surgery should yield better outcomes due to its superior precision and control. Our study provided more evidence in support of this theory after comparing 62 patients who had laparoscopic surgery with 61 patients who had robotic surgery for the removal of their pancreatic tumours. We found that robotic surgeries resulted in fewer cases of conversion to open operations and fewer complications. ABSTRACT: Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). The LDP group also had a higher rate of postoperative complications (43.5% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major complication or pancreatic fistular after operations (p = 0.20 and p = 0.71, respectively). For planned spleen-preserving operations, the RDP group had a shorter mean operative time (147 min vs. 194 min, p = 0.015) and a reduced total length of hospital stay compared with the LDP group (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0002). The failure rate for spleen preservation was 0% in RDP and 20% (n = 5/25) in the LDP group (p = 0.009). RDP offered a better method for splenic preservation with Kimura’s technique compared with LDP to avoid the risk of splenic infarction and gastric varices related to ligation and division of splenic pedicles. RDP should be the standard operation for the resection of pancreatic tumours at the body and tail of the pancreas without involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10669937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106699372023-11-20 Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases Ding, Hao Kawka, Michal Gall, Tamara M. H. Wadsworth, Chris Habib, Nagy Nicol, David Cunningham, David Jiao, Long R. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Pancreatic tumours usually require surgical removal. With advancing technology, these operations can be performed using laparoscopic and robotic techniques, which reduce surgical trauma to patients compared to conventional open surgery. In theory, robotic surgery should yield better outcomes due to its superior precision and control. Our study provided more evidence in support of this theory after comparing 62 patients who had laparoscopic surgery with 61 patients who had robotic surgery for the removal of their pancreatic tumours. We found that robotic surgeries resulted in fewer cases of conversion to open operations and fewer complications. ABSTRACT: Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). The LDP group also had a higher rate of postoperative complications (43.5% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major complication or pancreatic fistular after operations (p = 0.20 and p = 0.71, respectively). For planned spleen-preserving operations, the RDP group had a shorter mean operative time (147 min vs. 194 min, p = 0.015) and a reduced total length of hospital stay compared with the LDP group (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0002). The failure rate for spleen preservation was 0% in RDP and 20% (n = 5/25) in the LDP group (p = 0.009). RDP offered a better method for splenic preservation with Kimura’s technique compared with LDP to avoid the risk of splenic infarction and gastric varices related to ligation and division of splenic pedicles. RDP should be the standard operation for the resection of pancreatic tumours at the body and tail of the pancreas without involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery. MDPI 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10669937/ /pubmed/38001752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225492 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ding, Hao
Kawka, Michal
Gall, Tamara M. H.
Wadsworth, Chris
Habib, Nagy
Nicol, David
Cunningham, David
Jiao, Long R.
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
title Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
title_full Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
title_fullStr Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
title_short Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
title_sort robotic distal pancreatectomy yields superior outcomes compared to laparoscopic technique: a single surgeon experience of 123 consecutive cases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225492
work_keys_str_mv AT dinghao roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT kawkamichal roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT galltamaramh roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT wadsworthchris roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT habibnagy roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT nicoldavid roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT cunninghamdavid roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases
AT jiaolongr roboticdistalpancreatectomyyieldssuperioroutcomescomparedtolaparoscopictechniqueasinglesurgeonexperienceof123consecutivecases