Cargando…

The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex

We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorban, Corina, Zhang, Zhongxing, Mensen, Armand, Khatami, Ramin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111609
_version_ 1785149282718842880
author Gorban, Corina
Zhang, Zhongxing
Mensen, Armand
Khatami, Ramin
author_facet Gorban, Corina
Zhang, Zhongxing
Mensen, Armand
Khatami, Ramin
author_sort Gorban, Corina
collection PubMed
description We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of the previously inhibited (after cTBS) or excited (after iTBS) left primary motor cortex (M1) as elicited by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) in a cross-over design. Mean relative changes in hemodynamics within 6 s of the stimulus were compared using a two-sample t-test (p < 0.05) and linear mixed model between real and sham stimuli and between stimuli after cTBS and iTBS. Only spTMS after cTBS resulted in a significant increase (p = 0.04) in blood volume (BV) compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in other hemodynamic parameters (oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin). spTMS after cTBS induced a larger increase in BV than spTMS after iTBS (p = 0.021) and sham stimulus after cTBS (p = 0.009). BV showed no significant difference between real and sham stimuli after iTBS (p = 0.37). The greater hemodynamic changes suggest increased vasomotor reactivity after cTBS compared to iTBS. In addition, cTBS could decrease lateral inhibition, allowing activation of surrounding areas after cTBS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10670137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106701372023-11-20 The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex Gorban, Corina Zhang, Zhongxing Mensen, Armand Khatami, Ramin Brain Sci Article We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of the previously inhibited (after cTBS) or excited (after iTBS) left primary motor cortex (M1) as elicited by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) in a cross-over design. Mean relative changes in hemodynamics within 6 s of the stimulus were compared using a two-sample t-test (p < 0.05) and linear mixed model between real and sham stimuli and between stimuli after cTBS and iTBS. Only spTMS after cTBS resulted in a significant increase (p = 0.04) in blood volume (BV) compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in other hemodynamic parameters (oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin). spTMS after cTBS induced a larger increase in BV than spTMS after iTBS (p = 0.021) and sham stimulus after cTBS (p = 0.009). BV showed no significant difference between real and sham stimuli after iTBS (p = 0.37). The greater hemodynamic changes suggest increased vasomotor reactivity after cTBS compared to iTBS. In addition, cTBS could decrease lateral inhibition, allowing activation of surrounding areas after cTBS. MDPI 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10670137/ /pubmed/38002568 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111609 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gorban, Corina
Zhang, Zhongxing
Mensen, Armand
Khatami, Ramin
The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
title The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
title_full The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
title_fullStr The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
title_short The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
title_sort comparison of early hemodynamic response to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation following inhibitory or excitatory theta burst stimulation on motor cortex
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111609
work_keys_str_mv AT gorbancorina thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT zhangzhongxing thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT mensenarmand thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT khatamiramin thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT gorbancorina comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT zhangzhongxing comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT mensenarmand comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex
AT khatamiramin comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex