Cargando…
The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex
We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002568 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111609 |
_version_ | 1785149282718842880 |
---|---|
author | Gorban, Corina Zhang, Zhongxing Mensen, Armand Khatami, Ramin |
author_facet | Gorban, Corina Zhang, Zhongxing Mensen, Armand Khatami, Ramin |
author_sort | Gorban, Corina |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of the previously inhibited (after cTBS) or excited (after iTBS) left primary motor cortex (M1) as elicited by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) in a cross-over design. Mean relative changes in hemodynamics within 6 s of the stimulus were compared using a two-sample t-test (p < 0.05) and linear mixed model between real and sham stimuli and between stimuli after cTBS and iTBS. Only spTMS after cTBS resulted in a significant increase (p = 0.04) in blood volume (BV) compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in other hemodynamic parameters (oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin). spTMS after cTBS induced a larger increase in BV than spTMS after iTBS (p = 0.021) and sham stimulus after cTBS (p = 0.009). BV showed no significant difference between real and sham stimuli after iTBS (p = 0.37). The greater hemodynamic changes suggest increased vasomotor reactivity after cTBS compared to iTBS. In addition, cTBS could decrease lateral inhibition, allowing activation of surrounding areas after cTBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10670137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106701372023-11-20 The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex Gorban, Corina Zhang, Zhongxing Mensen, Armand Khatami, Ramin Brain Sci Article We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of the previously inhibited (after cTBS) or excited (after iTBS) left primary motor cortex (M1) as elicited by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) in a cross-over design. Mean relative changes in hemodynamics within 6 s of the stimulus were compared using a two-sample t-test (p < 0.05) and linear mixed model between real and sham stimuli and between stimuli after cTBS and iTBS. Only spTMS after cTBS resulted in a significant increase (p = 0.04) in blood volume (BV) compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in other hemodynamic parameters (oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin). spTMS after cTBS induced a larger increase in BV than spTMS after iTBS (p = 0.021) and sham stimulus after cTBS (p = 0.009). BV showed no significant difference between real and sham stimuli after iTBS (p = 0.37). The greater hemodynamic changes suggest increased vasomotor reactivity after cTBS compared to iTBS. In addition, cTBS could decrease lateral inhibition, allowing activation of surrounding areas after cTBS. MDPI 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10670137/ /pubmed/38002568 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111609 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gorban, Corina Zhang, Zhongxing Mensen, Armand Khatami, Ramin The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex |
title | The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex |
title_full | The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex |
title_fullStr | The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex |
title_short | The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex |
title_sort | comparison of early hemodynamic response to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation following inhibitory or excitatory theta burst stimulation on motor cortex |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002568 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorbancorina thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT zhangzhongxing thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT mensenarmand thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT khatamiramin thecomparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT gorbancorina comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT zhangzhongxing comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT mensenarmand comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex AT khatamiramin comparisonofearlyhemodynamicresponsetosinglepulsetranscranialmagneticstimulationfollowinginhibitoryorexcitatorythetaburststimulationonmotorcortex |