Cargando…

Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition

Background: This present retrospective study aimed to introduce Lower Incisor—Pg and to assess how this new parameter varies with the skeletal sagittal and vertical relationships. Methods: A total of 1256 cephalometric analyses were performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs of a sample of su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galdi, Marzio, Di Spirito, Federica, Amato, Alessandra, Cannatà, Davide, Rongo, Roberto, Martina, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37999028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11110264
_version_ 1785139943300923392
author Galdi, Marzio
Di Spirito, Federica
Amato, Alessandra
Cannatà, Davide
Rongo, Roberto
Martina, Stefano
author_facet Galdi, Marzio
Di Spirito, Federica
Amato, Alessandra
Cannatà, Davide
Rongo, Roberto
Martina, Stefano
author_sort Galdi, Marzio
collection PubMed
description Background: This present retrospective study aimed to introduce Lower Incisor—Pg and to assess how this new parameter varies with the skeletal sagittal and vertical relationships. Methods: A total of 1256 cephalometric analyses were performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs of a sample of subjects divided according to SN^Go-Gn, ANPg^, and IMPA measurements. The differences in Lower Incisor—Pg between the groups were assessed through ANOVA tests and posthoc analyses, while Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the correlations between the measurements. Results: The mesofacial growth pattern (61.0%) was more common than dolichofacial (30.0%) and brachyfacial (8.6%) ones in the sampled population. Regarding skeletal sagittal relationships, Class I was more frequent (70.9%) than Class II (19.3%) and Class III (9.8%). The mean value of the Lower Incisor—Pg was 3.2 ± 4.0 mm. Linear regression showed that the β coefficient was 0.45 and 0.36 for ANPg^ and SnGoGn^, respectively. Conclusions: Lower Incisor—Pg is a linear cephalometric measurement to evaluate the lower incisor sagittal position. For each degree of increase in ANPg^ and SNGoGn^, the Lower Incisor—Pg increased 0.45 mm and 0.36 mm, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10670524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106705242023-11-10 Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition Galdi, Marzio Di Spirito, Federica Amato, Alessandra Cannatà, Davide Rongo, Roberto Martina, Stefano Dent J (Basel) Article Background: This present retrospective study aimed to introduce Lower Incisor—Pg and to assess how this new parameter varies with the skeletal sagittal and vertical relationships. Methods: A total of 1256 cephalometric analyses were performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs of a sample of subjects divided according to SN^Go-Gn, ANPg^, and IMPA measurements. The differences in Lower Incisor—Pg between the groups were assessed through ANOVA tests and posthoc analyses, while Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the correlations between the measurements. Results: The mesofacial growth pattern (61.0%) was more common than dolichofacial (30.0%) and brachyfacial (8.6%) ones in the sampled population. Regarding skeletal sagittal relationships, Class I was more frequent (70.9%) than Class II (19.3%) and Class III (9.8%). The mean value of the Lower Incisor—Pg was 3.2 ± 4.0 mm. Linear regression showed that the β coefficient was 0.45 and 0.36 for ANPg^ and SnGoGn^, respectively. Conclusions: Lower Incisor—Pg is a linear cephalometric measurement to evaluate the lower incisor sagittal position. For each degree of increase in ANPg^ and SNGoGn^, the Lower Incisor—Pg increased 0.45 mm and 0.36 mm, respectively. MDPI 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10670524/ /pubmed/37999028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11110264 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Galdi, Marzio
Di Spirito, Federica
Amato, Alessandra
Cannatà, Davide
Rongo, Roberto
Martina, Stefano
Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition
title Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition
title_full Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition
title_fullStr Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition
title_full_unstemmed Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition
title_short Lower Incisor—Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition
title_sort lower incisor—pg: a new cephalometric parameter to evaluate the anterior limit of dentition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37999028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11110264
work_keys_str_mv AT galdimarzio lowerincisorpganewcephalometricparametertoevaluatetheanteriorlimitofdentition
AT dispiritofederica lowerincisorpganewcephalometricparametertoevaluatetheanteriorlimitofdentition
AT amatoalessandra lowerincisorpganewcephalometricparametertoevaluatetheanteriorlimitofdentition
AT cannatadavide lowerincisorpganewcephalometricparametertoevaluatetheanteriorlimitofdentition
AT rongoroberto lowerincisorpganewcephalometricparametertoevaluatetheanteriorlimitofdentition
AT martinastefano lowerincisorpganewcephalometricparametertoevaluatetheanteriorlimitofdentition