Cargando…

Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has heralded a transformative era in the way students learn and faculties teach. Among the burgeoning array of AI tools, ChatGPT stands out as a versatile and powerful resource. Developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT is an AI-driven conversation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasanein, Ahmed M., Sobaih, Abu Elnasr E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37998071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181
_version_ 1785139943764393984
author Hasanein, Ahmed M.
Sobaih, Abu Elnasr E.
author_facet Hasanein, Ahmed M.
Sobaih, Abu Elnasr E.
author_sort Hasanein, Ahmed M.
collection PubMed
description The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has heralded a transformative era in the way students learn and faculties teach. Among the burgeoning array of AI tools, ChatGPT stands out as a versatile and powerful resource. Developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT is an AI-driven conversational model that generates human-like responses. This research draws on the Constructivism Learning Theory to uncover the key drivers pushing higher education students to use ChatGPT for academic purposes, and the multifaceted consequences it brings to the academic environment, by integrating the perspectives of key stakeholders: students, faculty, and education experts/leaders. The key findings of in-depth, face-to-face, interviews with key stakeholders revealed 12 main drivers that motivate students and their faculty to use ChatGPT mainly for learning purposes. However, the findings identified the multifaceted (six positive and another six negative) consequences of using ChatGPT for academic purposes. Recommendations for mitigating the negative consequences of ChatGPT were discussed with key stakeholders, particularly education experts/leaders, who were more concerned about using ChatGPT for academic reasons. The research reveals that higher education institutions should establish clear guidelines as a part of higher education policy, supplemented with training sessions for students and their faculty, about the responsible use of ChatGPT for academic purposes to mitigate any ethical concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10670526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106705262023-11-09 Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives Hasanein, Ahmed M. Sobaih, Abu Elnasr E. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ Article The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has heralded a transformative era in the way students learn and faculties teach. Among the burgeoning array of AI tools, ChatGPT stands out as a versatile and powerful resource. Developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT is an AI-driven conversational model that generates human-like responses. This research draws on the Constructivism Learning Theory to uncover the key drivers pushing higher education students to use ChatGPT for academic purposes, and the multifaceted consequences it brings to the academic environment, by integrating the perspectives of key stakeholders: students, faculty, and education experts/leaders. The key findings of in-depth, face-to-face, interviews with key stakeholders revealed 12 main drivers that motivate students and their faculty to use ChatGPT mainly for learning purposes. However, the findings identified the multifaceted (six positive and another six negative) consequences of using ChatGPT for academic purposes. Recommendations for mitigating the negative consequences of ChatGPT were discussed with key stakeholders, particularly education experts/leaders, who were more concerned about using ChatGPT for academic reasons. The research reveals that higher education institutions should establish clear guidelines as a part of higher education policy, supplemented with training sessions for students and their faculty, about the responsible use of ChatGPT for academic purposes to mitigate any ethical concerns. MDPI 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10670526/ /pubmed/37998071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hasanein, Ahmed M.
Sobaih, Abu Elnasr E.
Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
title Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
title_full Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
title_fullStr Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
title_short Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives
title_sort drivers and consequences of chatgpt use in higher education: key stakeholder perspectives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37998071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181
work_keys_str_mv AT hasaneinahmedm driversandconsequencesofchatgptuseinhighereducationkeystakeholderperspectives
AT sobaihabuelnasre driversandconsequencesofchatgptuseinhighereducationkeystakeholderperspectives