Cargando…
The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, the impact of body mass index on oncological outcomes is still a matter of debate. We use the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract Registry to compare the overall survival, canc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225364 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, the impact of body mass index on oncological outcomes is still a matter of debate. We use the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract Registry to compare the overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival between normal weight, overweight and obese patients. After balancing the clinicopathological features by propensity score matching, being overweight/obese (body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival. ABSTRACT: (1) Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether overweight and obese upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) patients have better or worse survival outcomes. (2) Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry was used to extract the data of normal-weight or overweight/obese UTUC patients between 2014 and 2019. Patients with a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m(2) were defined as normal weight, while those with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2) were considered as overweight/obese group. We compared baseline characteristics among groups categorized by different BMIs. The Kaplan–Meier plots with the log-rank test were used to explore the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the differences in clinicopathologic features. The Declaration of Helsinki was followed during this study. (3) Results: Of 1196 UTUC patients, 486 patients (40.6%) were normal weight, while 710 patients (59.4%) presented with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2). After propensity score matching, all baseline characteristics were balanced. For normal weight and overweight/obese patients, 2-year overall survival rates were 77.8% and 87.2%, 2-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.2% and 92.7%, and 2-year recurrence rates were 50.6% and 73.0%, respectively. The overweight patients obtained a better RFS (p = 0.003, HR 0.548, 95% CI 0.368–0.916) while their OS (p = 0.373, HR 0.761, 95% CI 0.416–1.390) and CSS (p = 0.272, HR 0.640, 95% CI 0.287–1.427) were similar to normal weight patients. (4) Conclusions: Being overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in UTUC patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival. |
---|