Cargando…

The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, the impact of body mass index on oncological outcomes is still a matter of debate. We use the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract Registry to compare the overall survival, canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Kang, Zhao, Hongda, Ng, Chi-Fai, Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Laguna, Pilar, Gontero, Paolo, Saltirov, Iliya, de la Rosette, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225364
_version_ 1785139969467088896
author Liu, Kang
Zhao, Hongda
Ng, Chi-Fai
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
Laguna, Pilar
Gontero, Paolo
Saltirov, Iliya
de la Rosette, Jean
author_facet Liu, Kang
Zhao, Hongda
Ng, Chi-Fai
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
Laguna, Pilar
Gontero, Paolo
Saltirov, Iliya
de la Rosette, Jean
author_sort Liu, Kang
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: In patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, the impact of body mass index on oncological outcomes is still a matter of debate. We use the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract Registry to compare the overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival between normal weight, overweight and obese patients. After balancing the clinicopathological features by propensity score matching, being overweight/obese (body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival. ABSTRACT: (1) Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether overweight and obese upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) patients have better or worse survival outcomes. (2) Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry was used to extract the data of normal-weight or overweight/obese UTUC patients between 2014 and 2019. Patients with a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m(2) were defined as normal weight, while those with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2) were considered as overweight/obese group. We compared baseline characteristics among groups categorized by different BMIs. The Kaplan–Meier plots with the log-rank test were used to explore the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the differences in clinicopathologic features. The Declaration of Helsinki was followed during this study. (3) Results: Of 1196 UTUC patients, 486 patients (40.6%) were normal weight, while 710 patients (59.4%) presented with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2). After propensity score matching, all baseline characteristics were balanced. For normal weight and overweight/obese patients, 2-year overall survival rates were 77.8% and 87.2%, 2-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.2% and 92.7%, and 2-year recurrence rates were 50.6% and 73.0%, respectively. The overweight patients obtained a better RFS (p = 0.003, HR 0.548, 95% CI 0.368–0.916) while their OS (p = 0.373, HR 0.761, 95% CI 0.416–1.390) and CSS (p = 0.272, HR 0.640, 95% CI 0.287–1.427) were similar to normal weight patients. (4) Conclusions: Being overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in UTUC patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10670636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106706362023-11-10 The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Liu, Kang Zhao, Hongda Ng, Chi-Fai Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Laguna, Pilar Gontero, Paolo Saltirov, Iliya de la Rosette, Jean Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, the impact of body mass index on oncological outcomes is still a matter of debate. We use the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract Registry to compare the overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival between normal weight, overweight and obese patients. After balancing the clinicopathological features by propensity score matching, being overweight/obese (body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival. ABSTRACT: (1) Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether overweight and obese upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) patients have better or worse survival outcomes. (2) Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry was used to extract the data of normal-weight or overweight/obese UTUC patients between 2014 and 2019. Patients with a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m(2) were defined as normal weight, while those with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2) were considered as overweight/obese group. We compared baseline characteristics among groups categorized by different BMIs. The Kaplan–Meier plots with the log-rank test were used to explore the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the differences in clinicopathologic features. The Declaration of Helsinki was followed during this study. (3) Results: Of 1196 UTUC patients, 486 patients (40.6%) were normal weight, while 710 patients (59.4%) presented with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2). After propensity score matching, all baseline characteristics were balanced. For normal weight and overweight/obese patients, 2-year overall survival rates were 77.8% and 87.2%, 2-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.2% and 92.7%, and 2-year recurrence rates were 50.6% and 73.0%, respectively. The overweight patients obtained a better RFS (p = 0.003, HR 0.548, 95% CI 0.368–0.916) while their OS (p = 0.373, HR 0.761, 95% CI 0.416–1.390) and CSS (p = 0.272, HR 0.640, 95% CI 0.287–1.427) were similar to normal weight patients. (4) Conclusions: Being overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in UTUC patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival. MDPI 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10670636/ /pubmed/38001624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225364 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Kang
Zhao, Hongda
Ng, Chi-Fai
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
Laguna, Pilar
Gontero, Paolo
Saltirov, Iliya
de la Rosette, Jean
The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
title The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
title_full The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
title_fullStr The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
title_short The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
title_sort prognostic role of body mass index on oncological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225364
work_keys_str_mv AT liukang theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT zhaohongda theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT ngchifai theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT teohjeremyyuenchun theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT lagunapilar theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT gonteropaolo theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT saltiroviliya theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT delarosettejean theprognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT liukang prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT zhaohongda prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT ngchifai prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT teohjeremyyuenchun prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT lagunapilar prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT gonteropaolo prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT saltiroviliya prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma
AT delarosettejean prognosticroleofbodymassindexononcologicaloutcomesofuppertracturothelialcarcinoma