Cargando…

Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Machine learning methods have shown promise in accurately identifying small lung nodules. However, further exploration is needed to fully harness the potential of machine learning in distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a ResNe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Weiming, Yu, Siqi, Yang, Runhuang, Tian, Yixing, Zhu, Tianyu, Liu, Haotian, Jiao, Danyang, Zhang, Feng, Liu, Xiangtong, Tao, Lixin, Gao, Yan, Li, Qiang, Zhang, Jingbo, Guo, Xiuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225417
_version_ 1785149343172395008
author Li, Weiming
Yu, Siqi
Yang, Runhuang
Tian, Yixing
Zhu, Tianyu
Liu, Haotian
Jiao, Danyang
Zhang, Feng
Liu, Xiangtong
Tao, Lixin
Gao, Yan
Li, Qiang
Zhang, Jingbo
Guo, Xiuhua
author_facet Li, Weiming
Yu, Siqi
Yang, Runhuang
Tian, Yixing
Zhu, Tianyu
Liu, Haotian
Jiao, Danyang
Zhang, Feng
Liu, Xiangtong
Tao, Lixin
Gao, Yan
Li, Qiang
Zhang, Jingbo
Guo, Xiuhua
author_sort Li, Weiming
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Machine learning methods have shown promise in accurately identifying small lung nodules. However, further exploration is needed to fully harness the potential of machine learning in distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a ResNet50-Ensemble Voting model for detecting the nature (benign or malignant) of small pulmonary nodules (less than 20 mm) based on CT images. This study involved 834 CT imaging data from 396 patients with small pulmonary nodules. CT image features were extracted using ResNet50 and VGG16 algorithms, and classification was performed using XGBoost, SVM, and Ensemble Voting techniques, incorporating ten different combinations of machine learning classifiers. Among the models tested, the ResNet50-Ensemble Voting algorithm demonstrated the highest performance in the test set, achieving an accuracy of 0.943 (0.938, 0.948), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.964 and 0.911, respectively. The implementation of machine learning models, particularly the ResNet50-Ensemble Voting approach, showed excellent performance in accurately identifying benign and malignant small pulmonary nodules (less than 20 mm) from diverse sources. These models have the potential to assist doctors in accurately diagnosing the nature of early-stage lung nodules in clinical practice. ABSTRACT: Background: The early detection of benign and malignant lung tumors enabled patients to diagnose lesions and implement appropriate health measures earlier, dramatically improving lung cancer patients’ quality of living. Machine learning methods performed admirably when recognizing small benign and malignant lung nodules. However, exploration and investigation are required to fully leverage the potential of machine learning in distinguishing between benign and malignant small lung nodules. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the ResNet50-Ensemble Voting model for detecting the benign and malignant nature of small pulmonary nodules (<20 mm) based on CT images. Methods: In this study, 834 CT imaging data from 396 patients with small pulmonary nodules were gathered and randomly assigned to the training and validation sets in an 8:2 ratio. ResNet50 and VGG16 algorithms were utilized to extract CT image features, followed by XGBoost, SVM, and Ensemble Voting techniques for classification, for a total of ten different classes of machine learning combinatorial classifiers. Indicators such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess the models. The collected features are also shown to investigate the contrasts between them. Results: The algorithm we presented, ResNet50-Ensemble Voting, performed best in the test set, with an accuracy of 0.943 (0.938, 0.948) and sensitivity and specificity of 0.964 and 0.911, respectively. VGG16-Ensemble Voting had an accuracy of 0.887 (0.880, 0.894), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.952 and 0.784, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning models that were implemented and integrated ResNet50-Ensemble Voting performed exceptionally well in identifying benign and malignant small pulmonary nodules (<20 mm) from various sites, which might help doctors in accurately diagnosing the nature of early-stage lung nodules in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10670717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106707172023-11-15 Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images Li, Weiming Yu, Siqi Yang, Runhuang Tian, Yixing Zhu, Tianyu Liu, Haotian Jiao, Danyang Zhang, Feng Liu, Xiangtong Tao, Lixin Gao, Yan Li, Qiang Zhang, Jingbo Guo, Xiuhua Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Machine learning methods have shown promise in accurately identifying small lung nodules. However, further exploration is needed to fully harness the potential of machine learning in distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a ResNet50-Ensemble Voting model for detecting the nature (benign or malignant) of small pulmonary nodules (less than 20 mm) based on CT images. This study involved 834 CT imaging data from 396 patients with small pulmonary nodules. CT image features were extracted using ResNet50 and VGG16 algorithms, and classification was performed using XGBoost, SVM, and Ensemble Voting techniques, incorporating ten different combinations of machine learning classifiers. Among the models tested, the ResNet50-Ensemble Voting algorithm demonstrated the highest performance in the test set, achieving an accuracy of 0.943 (0.938, 0.948), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.964 and 0.911, respectively. The implementation of machine learning models, particularly the ResNet50-Ensemble Voting approach, showed excellent performance in accurately identifying benign and malignant small pulmonary nodules (less than 20 mm) from diverse sources. These models have the potential to assist doctors in accurately diagnosing the nature of early-stage lung nodules in clinical practice. ABSTRACT: Background: The early detection of benign and malignant lung tumors enabled patients to diagnose lesions and implement appropriate health measures earlier, dramatically improving lung cancer patients’ quality of living. Machine learning methods performed admirably when recognizing small benign and malignant lung nodules. However, exploration and investigation are required to fully leverage the potential of machine learning in distinguishing between benign and malignant small lung nodules. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the ResNet50-Ensemble Voting model for detecting the benign and malignant nature of small pulmonary nodules (<20 mm) based on CT images. Methods: In this study, 834 CT imaging data from 396 patients with small pulmonary nodules were gathered and randomly assigned to the training and validation sets in an 8:2 ratio. ResNet50 and VGG16 algorithms were utilized to extract CT image features, followed by XGBoost, SVM, and Ensemble Voting techniques for classification, for a total of ten different classes of machine learning combinatorial classifiers. Indicators such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess the models. The collected features are also shown to investigate the contrasts between them. Results: The algorithm we presented, ResNet50-Ensemble Voting, performed best in the test set, with an accuracy of 0.943 (0.938, 0.948) and sensitivity and specificity of 0.964 and 0.911, respectively. VGG16-Ensemble Voting had an accuracy of 0.887 (0.880, 0.894), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.952 and 0.784, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning models that were implemented and integrated ResNet50-Ensemble Voting performed exceptionally well in identifying benign and malignant small pulmonary nodules (<20 mm) from various sites, which might help doctors in accurately diagnosing the nature of early-stage lung nodules in clinical practice. MDPI 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10670717/ /pubmed/38001677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225417 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Weiming
Yu, Siqi
Yang, Runhuang
Tian, Yixing
Zhu, Tianyu
Liu, Haotian
Jiao, Danyang
Zhang, Feng
Liu, Xiangtong
Tao, Lixin
Gao, Yan
Li, Qiang
Zhang, Jingbo
Guo, Xiuhua
Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images
title Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images
title_full Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images
title_fullStr Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images
title_short Machine Learning Model of ResNet50-Ensemble Voting for Malignant–Benign Small Pulmonary Nodule Classification on Computed Tomography Images
title_sort machine learning model of resnet50-ensemble voting for malignant–benign small pulmonary nodule classification on computed tomography images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225417
work_keys_str_mv AT liweiming machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT yusiqi machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT yangrunhuang machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT tianyixing machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT zhutianyu machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT liuhaotian machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT jiaodanyang machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT zhangfeng machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT liuxiangtong machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT taolixin machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT gaoyan machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT liqiang machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT zhangjingbo machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages
AT guoxiuhua machinelearningmodelofresnet50ensemblevotingformalignantbenignsmallpulmonarynoduleclassificationoncomputedtomographyimages