Cargando…

Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle

The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, JeongWoo, Chae, HyunYoung, Jeong, SungHoon, Pervin, Rokeya, Hossain, Md Akil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262
_version_ 1785149431633412096
author Kang, JeongWoo
Chae, HyunYoung
Jeong, SungHoon
Pervin, Rokeya
Hossain, Md Akil
author_facet Kang, JeongWoo
Chae, HyunYoung
Jeong, SungHoon
Pervin, Rokeya
Hossain, Md Akil
author_sort Kang, JeongWoo
collection PubMed
description The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence was evaluated by performing pharmacokinetic assessments. The four selected GTPs (Tulaject, Tulagen, Toulashot, and T-raxxin) were compared with the reference product, Draxxin. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg.bw/day was administered via subcutaneous injection, and blood samples were collected 460 times from 20 Holstein cattle. Plasma concentrations of tulathromycin were measured over time using LC-MS/MS analysis. Bioequivalence was evaluated using a statistical program for pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). The bioequivalence was considered proven if the difference between the test and reference products was within 20% for both AUC and C(max). The results showed that the confidence interval (CI, 90%) for both AUC and C(max) values was within the 80~120% range, demonstrating the bioequivalence of the four GTPs compared to Draxxin. This study provides evidence for the bioequivalence of the selected GTPs, contributing to their validation for use as effective antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10671567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106715672023-11-13 Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle Kang, JeongWoo Chae, HyunYoung Jeong, SungHoon Pervin, Rokeya Hossain, Md Akil Int J Mol Sci Article The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence was evaluated by performing pharmacokinetic assessments. The four selected GTPs (Tulaject, Tulagen, Toulashot, and T-raxxin) were compared with the reference product, Draxxin. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg.bw/day was administered via subcutaneous injection, and blood samples were collected 460 times from 20 Holstein cattle. Plasma concentrations of tulathromycin were measured over time using LC-MS/MS analysis. Bioequivalence was evaluated using a statistical program for pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). The bioequivalence was considered proven if the difference between the test and reference products was within 20% for both AUC and C(max). The results showed that the confidence interval (CI, 90%) for both AUC and C(max) values was within the 80~120% range, demonstrating the bioequivalence of the four GTPs compared to Draxxin. This study provides evidence for the bioequivalence of the selected GTPs, contributing to their validation for use as effective antibiotics. MDPI 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10671567/ /pubmed/38003452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kang, JeongWoo
Chae, HyunYoung
Jeong, SungHoon
Pervin, Rokeya
Hossain, Md Akil
Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
title Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
title_full Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
title_fullStr Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
title_short Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
title_sort evaluation of biological equivalence for generic tulathromycin injections in cattle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262
work_keys_str_mv AT kangjeongwoo evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle
AT chaehyunyoung evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle
AT jeongsunghoon evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle
AT pervinrokeya evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle
AT hossainmdakil evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle