Cargando…
Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle
The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262 |
_version_ | 1785149431633412096 |
---|---|
author | Kang, JeongWoo Chae, HyunYoung Jeong, SungHoon Pervin, Rokeya Hossain, Md Akil |
author_facet | Kang, JeongWoo Chae, HyunYoung Jeong, SungHoon Pervin, Rokeya Hossain, Md Akil |
author_sort | Kang, JeongWoo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence was evaluated by performing pharmacokinetic assessments. The four selected GTPs (Tulaject, Tulagen, Toulashot, and T-raxxin) were compared with the reference product, Draxxin. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg.bw/day was administered via subcutaneous injection, and blood samples were collected 460 times from 20 Holstein cattle. Plasma concentrations of tulathromycin were measured over time using LC-MS/MS analysis. Bioequivalence was evaluated using a statistical program for pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). The bioequivalence was considered proven if the difference between the test and reference products was within 20% for both AUC and C(max). The results showed that the confidence interval (CI, 90%) for both AUC and C(max) values was within the 80~120% range, demonstrating the bioequivalence of the four GTPs compared to Draxxin. This study provides evidence for the bioequivalence of the selected GTPs, contributing to their validation for use as effective antibiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10671567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106715672023-11-13 Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle Kang, JeongWoo Chae, HyunYoung Jeong, SungHoon Pervin, Rokeya Hossain, Md Akil Int J Mol Sci Article The recent expiration of patents for the antibiotic tulathromycin has led to a significant increase in the number of generic tulathromycin products (GTPs) available. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of four GTPs, which experienced a rapid increase in market share. The bioequivalence was evaluated by performing pharmacokinetic assessments. The four selected GTPs (Tulaject, Tulagen, Toulashot, and T-raxxin) were compared with the reference product, Draxxin. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg.bw/day was administered via subcutaneous injection, and blood samples were collected 460 times from 20 Holstein cattle. Plasma concentrations of tulathromycin were measured over time using LC-MS/MS analysis. Bioequivalence was evaluated using a statistical program for pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). The bioequivalence was considered proven if the difference between the test and reference products was within 20% for both AUC and C(max). The results showed that the confidence interval (CI, 90%) for both AUC and C(max) values was within the 80~120% range, demonstrating the bioequivalence of the four GTPs compared to Draxxin. This study provides evidence for the bioequivalence of the selected GTPs, contributing to their validation for use as effective antibiotics. MDPI 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10671567/ /pubmed/38003452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kang, JeongWoo Chae, HyunYoung Jeong, SungHoon Pervin, Rokeya Hossain, Md Akil Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle |
title | Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle |
title_full | Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle |
title_short | Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle |
title_sort | evaluation of biological equivalence for generic tulathromycin injections in cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangjeongwoo evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle AT chaehyunyoung evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle AT jeongsunghoon evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle AT pervinrokeya evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle AT hossainmdakil evaluationofbiologicalequivalenceforgenerictulathromycininjectionsincattle |