Cargando…
Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance
Transcriptomics methods (RNA-Seq, PCR) today are more routine and reproducible than proteomics methods, i.e., both mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis. For this reason, most scientific studies are limited to assessing the level of mRNA content. At the same time, protein content (and its po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14112065 |
_version_ | 1785140228800905216 |
---|---|
author | Ponomarenko, Elena A. Krasnov, George S. Kiseleva, Olga I. Kryukova, Polina A. Arzumanian, Viktoriia A. Dolgalev, Georgii V. Ilgisonis, Ekaterina V. Lisitsa, Andrey V. Poverennaya, Ekaterina V. |
author_facet | Ponomarenko, Elena A. Krasnov, George S. Kiseleva, Olga I. Kryukova, Polina A. Arzumanian, Viktoriia A. Dolgalev, Georgii V. Ilgisonis, Ekaterina V. Lisitsa, Andrey V. Poverennaya, Ekaterina V. |
author_sort | Ponomarenko, Elena A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcriptomics methods (RNA-Seq, PCR) today are more routine and reproducible than proteomics methods, i.e., both mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis. For this reason, most scientific studies are limited to assessing the level of mRNA content. At the same time, protein content (and its post-translational status) largely determines the cell’s state and behavior. Such a forced extrapolation of conclusions from the transcriptome to the proteome often seems unjustified. The ratios of “transcript-protein” pairs can vary by several orders of magnitude for different genes. As a rule, the correlation coefficient between transcriptome–proteome levels for different tissues does not exceed 0.3–0.5. Several characteristics determine the ratio between the content of mRNA and protein: among them, the rate of movement of the ribosome along the mRNA and the number of free ribosomes in the cell, the availability of tRNA, the secondary structure, and the localization of the transcript. The technical features of the experimental methods also significantly influence the levels of the transcript and protein of the corresponding gene on the outcome of the comparison. Given the above biological features and the performance of experimental and bioinformatic approaches, one may develop various models to predict proteomic profiles based on transcriptomic data. This review is devoted to the ability of RNA sequencing methods for protein abundance prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10671741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106717412023-11-11 Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance Ponomarenko, Elena A. Krasnov, George S. Kiseleva, Olga I. Kryukova, Polina A. Arzumanian, Viktoriia A. Dolgalev, Georgii V. Ilgisonis, Ekaterina V. Lisitsa, Andrey V. Poverennaya, Ekaterina V. Genes (Basel) Review Transcriptomics methods (RNA-Seq, PCR) today are more routine and reproducible than proteomics methods, i.e., both mass spectrometry and immunochemical analysis. For this reason, most scientific studies are limited to assessing the level of mRNA content. At the same time, protein content (and its post-translational status) largely determines the cell’s state and behavior. Such a forced extrapolation of conclusions from the transcriptome to the proteome often seems unjustified. The ratios of “transcript-protein” pairs can vary by several orders of magnitude for different genes. As a rule, the correlation coefficient between transcriptome–proteome levels for different tissues does not exceed 0.3–0.5. Several characteristics determine the ratio between the content of mRNA and protein: among them, the rate of movement of the ribosome along the mRNA and the number of free ribosomes in the cell, the availability of tRNA, the secondary structure, and the localization of the transcript. The technical features of the experimental methods also significantly influence the levels of the transcript and protein of the corresponding gene on the outcome of the comparison. Given the above biological features and the performance of experimental and bioinformatic approaches, one may develop various models to predict proteomic profiles based on transcriptomic data. This review is devoted to the ability of RNA sequencing methods for protein abundance prediction. MDPI 2023-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10671741/ /pubmed/38003008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14112065 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ponomarenko, Elena A. Krasnov, George S. Kiseleva, Olga I. Kryukova, Polina A. Arzumanian, Viktoriia A. Dolgalev, Georgii V. Ilgisonis, Ekaterina V. Lisitsa, Andrey V. Poverennaya, Ekaterina V. Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance |
title | Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance |
title_full | Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance |
title_fullStr | Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance |
title_full_unstemmed | Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance |
title_short | Workability of mRNA Sequencing for Predicting Protein Abundance |
title_sort | workability of mrna sequencing for predicting protein abundance |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14112065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ponomarenkoelenaa workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT krasnovgeorges workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT kiselevaolgai workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT kryukovapolinaa workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT arzumanianviktoriiaa workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT dolgalevgeorgiiv workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT ilgisonisekaterinav workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT lisitsaandreyv workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance AT poverennayaekaterinav workabilityofmrnasequencingforpredictingproteinabundance |