Cargando…
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study
Endometrial cancer represents an ideal target to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 being the most frequent gynecological malignancy in Italy, generally detected at early stages and correlated with favorable oncological outcomes. The present comparative retrospective study carried out at Campus Bio-med...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227016 |
_version_ | 1785140271904718848 |
---|---|
author | Plotti, Francesco Silvagni, Adele Montera, Roberto De Cicco Nardone, Carlo Luvero, Daniela Ficarola, Fernando Cundari, Gianna Barbara Branda, Francesco Angioli, Roberto Terranova, Corrado |
author_facet | Plotti, Francesco Silvagni, Adele Montera, Roberto De Cicco Nardone, Carlo Luvero, Daniela Ficarola, Fernando Cundari, Gianna Barbara Branda, Francesco Angioli, Roberto Terranova, Corrado |
author_sort | Plotti, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endometrial cancer represents an ideal target to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 being the most frequent gynecological malignancy in Italy, generally detected at early stages and correlated with favorable oncological outcomes. The present comparative retrospective study carried out at Campus Bio-medico University Foundation in Rome aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of EC. All women with a histological diagnosis of non-endometrioid and endometrioid endometrial cancer between 1 March 2018 and 31 October 2022 were included. The number of cases was higher in period 2 (95 vs. 64 cases). Time to diagnosis did not show statistically significant differences but in period 2, 92.06% of the diagnoses were made following abnormal uterine bleeding, while in period 1, only 67.02% were. The waiting time for the intervention was significantly shorter in period 2. Definitive histology, FIGO staging, surgical technique and adjuvant therapy did not show significant differences between the two periods. The study demonstrates that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a direct effect on the diagnostic delay, tumor staging and type of therapy but rather on the presentation pattern of endometrial cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10671930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106719302023-11-09 Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study Plotti, Francesco Silvagni, Adele Montera, Roberto De Cicco Nardone, Carlo Luvero, Daniela Ficarola, Fernando Cundari, Gianna Barbara Branda, Francesco Angioli, Roberto Terranova, Corrado J Clin Med Article Endometrial cancer represents an ideal target to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 being the most frequent gynecological malignancy in Italy, generally detected at early stages and correlated with favorable oncological outcomes. The present comparative retrospective study carried out at Campus Bio-medico University Foundation in Rome aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of EC. All women with a histological diagnosis of non-endometrioid and endometrioid endometrial cancer between 1 March 2018 and 31 October 2022 were included. The number of cases was higher in period 2 (95 vs. 64 cases). Time to diagnosis did not show statistically significant differences but in period 2, 92.06% of the diagnoses were made following abnormal uterine bleeding, while in period 1, only 67.02% were. The waiting time for the intervention was significantly shorter in period 2. Definitive histology, FIGO staging, surgical technique and adjuvant therapy did not show significant differences between the two periods. The study demonstrates that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a direct effect on the diagnostic delay, tumor staging and type of therapy but rather on the presentation pattern of endometrial cancer. MDPI 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10671930/ /pubmed/38002630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227016 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Plotti, Francesco Silvagni, Adele Montera, Roberto De Cicco Nardone, Carlo Luvero, Daniela Ficarola, Fernando Cundari, Gianna Barbara Branda, Francesco Angioli, Roberto Terranova, Corrado Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study |
title | Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_full | Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_short | Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_sort | impact of covid-19 pandemic on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of endometrial cancer: a monocentric retrospective comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plottifrancesco impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT silvagniadele impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT monteraroberto impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT decicconardonecarlo impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT luverodaniela impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT ficarolafernando impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT cundarigiannabarbara impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT brandafrancesco impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT angioliroberto impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy AT terranovacorrado impactofcovid19pandemiconthediagnosticandtherapeuticmanagementofendometrialcanceramonocentricretrospectivecomparativestudy |