Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Background: It is not clear whether rehabilitation after surgery for trigger finger is effective. The aim of this study was to reveal its effectiveness for trigger finger. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial that included patients who underwent operations for trigger fingers. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Taichi, Nakamichi, Ryo, Nakahara, Ryuichi, Nishida, Keiichiro, Ozaki, Toshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227187
_version_ 1785149479436943360
author Saito, Taichi
Nakamichi, Ryo
Nakahara, Ryuichi
Nishida, Keiichiro
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_facet Saito, Taichi
Nakamichi, Ryo
Nakahara, Ryuichi
Nishida, Keiichiro
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_sort Saito, Taichi
collection PubMed
description Background: It is not clear whether rehabilitation after surgery for trigger finger is effective. The aim of this study was to reveal its effectiveness for trigger finger. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial that included patients who underwent operations for trigger fingers. The patients in the rehabilitation group had postoperative occupational therapy (OT) for 3 months, while the patients in the control group were not referred for rehabilitation but received advice for a range of motion exercises. We evaluated the severity of trigger finger, Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) score, pain-visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, whether they gained a full range of motion (ROM), and complications before and after surgery. Results: Finally, 29 and 28 patients were included in the control and rehabilitation groups, respectively. At final follow-up, the DASH score, grip strength, and ROM were significantly improved in the rehabilitation group compared to that preoperatively. At final follow-up, pain was significantly improved in both groups from that preoperatively. There were no significant differences in the results, including the DASH score, grip strength, ROM and pain-VAS between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that there is a significant difference in the DASH score of patients doing housework or light work and those with a duration of symptoms >12 months between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10671987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106719872023-11-20 The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Saito, Taichi Nakamichi, Ryo Nakahara, Ryuichi Nishida, Keiichiro Ozaki, Toshifumi J Clin Med Article Background: It is not clear whether rehabilitation after surgery for trigger finger is effective. The aim of this study was to reveal its effectiveness for trigger finger. Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled trial that included patients who underwent operations for trigger fingers. The patients in the rehabilitation group had postoperative occupational therapy (OT) for 3 months, while the patients in the control group were not referred for rehabilitation but received advice for a range of motion exercises. We evaluated the severity of trigger finger, Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) score, pain-visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, whether they gained a full range of motion (ROM), and complications before and after surgery. Results: Finally, 29 and 28 patients were included in the control and rehabilitation groups, respectively. At final follow-up, the DASH score, grip strength, and ROM were significantly improved in the rehabilitation group compared to that preoperatively. At final follow-up, pain was significantly improved in both groups from that preoperatively. There were no significant differences in the results, including the DASH score, grip strength, ROM and pain-VAS between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that there is a significant difference in the DASH score of patients doing housework or light work and those with a duration of symptoms >12 months between the control and rehabilitation groups at the final follow-up. MDPI 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10671987/ /pubmed/38002801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227187 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saito, Taichi
Nakamichi, Ryo
Nakahara, Ryuichi
Nishida, Keiichiro
Ozaki, Toshifumi
The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_full The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_short The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation after Open Surgical Release for Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_sort effectiveness of rehabilitation after open surgical release for trigger finger: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10671987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227187
work_keys_str_mv AT saitotaichi theeffectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakamichiryo theeffectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakahararyuichi theeffectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nishidakeiichiro theeffectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ozakitoshifumi theeffectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT saitotaichi effectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakamichiryo effectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakahararyuichi effectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nishidakeiichiro effectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ozakitoshifumi effectivenessofrehabilitationafteropensurgicalreleasefortriggerfingeraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy