Cargando…
Effectiveness of Deep Cervical Fascial Manipulation(®) and Sequential Yoga Poses on Pain and Function in Individuals with Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of fascial manipulation (FM) of the deep cervical fascia (DCF) and sequential yoga poses (SYP) on pain and function in individuals with mechanical neck pain (MNP). Method: Following the predefined criteria, ninety-nine individuals with MNP were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13112173 |
Sumario: | Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of fascial manipulation (FM) of the deep cervical fascia (DCF) and sequential yoga poses (SYP) on pain and function in individuals with mechanical neck pain (MNP). Method: Following the predefined criteria, ninety-nine individuals with MNP were recruited, randomised, and assigned to either the intervention group (IG) (n = 51) or the control group (CG) (n = 48). Individuals in the IG received FM (4 sessions in 4 weeks) and the home-based SYP (4 weeks). The CG participants received their usual care (cervical mobilisation and thoracic manipulation (4 sessions in 4 weeks) along with unsupervised therapeutic exercises (4 weeks). The participants underwent baseline and weekly follow-up measurements of pain using a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and elbow extension range of motion (EEROM) during the upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1). The baseline and the fourth session follow-up measurements of the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) and fear-avoidance behavior Questionnaire (FABQ) were also taken. Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA was performed. There were statistically significant differences between the IG and CG on the NPRS third and fourth sessions, with mean differences (MD) of −1.009 (p < 0.05) and −1.701 (p < 0.001), respectively. Regarding EEROM, there was a 20.120° difference (p < 0.001) in the fourth session between the groups. The MD in FABQ was −5.036 (p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in PSFS between the groups during the follow-up. Conclusion: FM and SYP can aid in reducing pain and fear-avoidance behaviour and improve the function and extensibility of the upper quarter region. |
---|