Cargando…
Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227189 |
_version_ | 1785149519884713984 |
---|---|
author | Hoss, Patrick Meyer, Ole Wölfle, Uta Christine Wülk, Annika Meusburger, Theresa Meier, Leon Hickel, Reinhard Gruhn, Volker Hesenius, Marc Kühnisch, Jan Dujic, Helena |
author_facet | Hoss, Patrick Meyer, Ole Wölfle, Uta Christine Wülk, Annika Meusburger, Theresa Meier, Leon Hickel, Reinhard Gruhn, Volker Hesenius, Marc Kühnisch, Jan Dujic, Helena |
author_sort | Hoss, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on periapical radiographs was analyzed. A set of anonymized periapical radiographs (N = 21,819) was evaluated by a group of trained and calibrated dentists and classified into radiographs without PBL or with mild, moderate, or severe PBL. Five CNNs were trained over five epochs. Statistically, diagnostic performance was analyzed using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Here, overall ACC ranged from 82.0% to 84.8%, SE 88.8–90.7%, SP 66.2–71.2%, and AUC 0.884–0.913, indicating similar diagnostic performance of the five CNNs. Furthermore, performance differences were evident in the individual sextant groups. Here, the highest values were found for the mandibular anterior teeth (ACC 94.9–96.0%) and the lowest values for the maxillary posterior teeth (78.0–80.7%). It can be concluded that automatic assessment of PBL seems to be possible, but that diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the location in the dentition. Future research is needed to improve performance for all tooth groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10672399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106723992023-11-20 Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks Hoss, Patrick Meyer, Ole Wölfle, Uta Christine Wülk, Annika Meusburger, Theresa Meier, Leon Hickel, Reinhard Gruhn, Volker Hesenius, Marc Kühnisch, Jan Dujic, Helena J Clin Med Article Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on periapical radiographs was analyzed. A set of anonymized periapical radiographs (N = 21,819) was evaluated by a group of trained and calibrated dentists and classified into radiographs without PBL or with mild, moderate, or severe PBL. Five CNNs were trained over five epochs. Statistically, diagnostic performance was analyzed using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Here, overall ACC ranged from 82.0% to 84.8%, SE 88.8–90.7%, SP 66.2–71.2%, and AUC 0.884–0.913, indicating similar diagnostic performance of the five CNNs. Furthermore, performance differences were evident in the individual sextant groups. Here, the highest values were found for the mandibular anterior teeth (ACC 94.9–96.0%) and the lowest values for the maxillary posterior teeth (78.0–80.7%). It can be concluded that automatic assessment of PBL seems to be possible, but that diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the location in the dentition. Future research is needed to improve performance for all tooth groups. MDPI 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10672399/ /pubmed/38002799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227189 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hoss, Patrick Meyer, Ole Wölfle, Uta Christine Wülk, Annika Meusburger, Theresa Meier, Leon Hickel, Reinhard Gruhn, Volker Hesenius, Marc Kühnisch, Jan Dujic, Helena Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks |
title | Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks |
title_full | Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks |
title_fullStr | Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks |
title_short | Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks |
title_sort | detection of periodontal bone loss on periapical radiographs—a diagnostic study using different convolutional neural networks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosspatrick detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT meyerole detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT wolfleutachristine detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT wulkannika detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT meusburgertheresa detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT meierleon detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT hickelreinhard detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT gruhnvolker detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT heseniusmarc detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT kuhnischjan detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT dujichelena detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks |