Cargando…

Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks

Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoss, Patrick, Meyer, Ole, Wölfle, Uta Christine, Wülk, Annika, Meusburger, Theresa, Meier, Leon, Hickel, Reinhard, Gruhn, Volker, Hesenius, Marc, Kühnisch, Jan, Dujic, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227189
_version_ 1785149519884713984
author Hoss, Patrick
Meyer, Ole
Wölfle, Uta Christine
Wülk, Annika
Meusburger, Theresa
Meier, Leon
Hickel, Reinhard
Gruhn, Volker
Hesenius, Marc
Kühnisch, Jan
Dujic, Helena
author_facet Hoss, Patrick
Meyer, Ole
Wölfle, Uta Christine
Wülk, Annika
Meusburger, Theresa
Meier, Leon
Hickel, Reinhard
Gruhn, Volker
Hesenius, Marc
Kühnisch, Jan
Dujic, Helena
author_sort Hoss, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on periapical radiographs was analyzed. A set of anonymized periapical radiographs (N = 21,819) was evaluated by a group of trained and calibrated dentists and classified into radiographs without PBL or with mild, moderate, or severe PBL. Five CNNs were trained over five epochs. Statistically, diagnostic performance was analyzed using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Here, overall ACC ranged from 82.0% to 84.8%, SE 88.8–90.7%, SP 66.2–71.2%, and AUC 0.884–0.913, indicating similar diagnostic performance of the five CNNs. Furthermore, performance differences were evident in the individual sextant groups. Here, the highest values were found for the mandibular anterior teeth (ACC 94.9–96.0%) and the lowest values for the maxillary posterior teeth (78.0–80.7%). It can be concluded that automatic assessment of PBL seems to be possible, but that diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the location in the dentition. Future research is needed to improve performance for all tooth groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10672399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106723992023-11-20 Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks Hoss, Patrick Meyer, Ole Wölfle, Uta Christine Wülk, Annika Meusburger, Theresa Meier, Leon Hickel, Reinhard Gruhn, Volker Hesenius, Marc Kühnisch, Jan Dujic, Helena J Clin Med Article Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on periapical radiographs was analyzed. A set of anonymized periapical radiographs (N = 21,819) was evaluated by a group of trained and calibrated dentists and classified into radiographs without PBL or with mild, moderate, or severe PBL. Five CNNs were trained over five epochs. Statistically, diagnostic performance was analyzed using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Here, overall ACC ranged from 82.0% to 84.8%, SE 88.8–90.7%, SP 66.2–71.2%, and AUC 0.884–0.913, indicating similar diagnostic performance of the five CNNs. Furthermore, performance differences were evident in the individual sextant groups. Here, the highest values were found for the mandibular anterior teeth (ACC 94.9–96.0%) and the lowest values for the maxillary posterior teeth (78.0–80.7%). It can be concluded that automatic assessment of PBL seems to be possible, but that diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the location in the dentition. Future research is needed to improve performance for all tooth groups. MDPI 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10672399/ /pubmed/38002799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227189 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hoss, Patrick
Meyer, Ole
Wölfle, Uta Christine
Wülk, Annika
Meusburger, Theresa
Meier, Leon
Hickel, Reinhard
Gruhn, Volker
Hesenius, Marc
Kühnisch, Jan
Dujic, Helena
Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
title Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
title_full Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
title_fullStr Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
title_short Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs—A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks
title_sort detection of periodontal bone loss on periapical radiographs—a diagnostic study using different convolutional neural networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227189
work_keys_str_mv AT hosspatrick detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT meyerole detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT wolfleutachristine detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT wulkannika detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT meusburgertheresa detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT meierleon detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT hickelreinhard detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT gruhnvolker detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT heseniusmarc detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT kuhnischjan detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT dujichelena detectionofperiodontalbonelossonperiapicalradiographsadiagnosticstudyusingdifferentconvolutionalneuralnetworks