Cargando…

Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review

(1) Background: Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models have been investigated for lymph node involvement (LNI) detection and prediction in Prostate cancer (PCa) patients, in order to reduce surgical risks and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to gather and analyze the few studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faiella, Eliodoro, Vaccarino, Federica, Ragone, Raffaele, D’Amone, Giulia, Cirimele, Vincenzo, Piccolo, Claudia Lucia, Vertulli, Daniele, Grasso, Rosario Francesco, Zobel, Bruno Beomonte, Santucci, Domiziana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227032
_version_ 1785140401118642176
author Faiella, Eliodoro
Vaccarino, Federica
Ragone, Raffaele
D’Amone, Giulia
Cirimele, Vincenzo
Piccolo, Claudia Lucia
Vertulli, Daniele
Grasso, Rosario Francesco
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
Santucci, Domiziana
author_facet Faiella, Eliodoro
Vaccarino, Federica
Ragone, Raffaele
D’Amone, Giulia
Cirimele, Vincenzo
Piccolo, Claudia Lucia
Vertulli, Daniele
Grasso, Rosario Francesco
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
Santucci, Domiziana
author_sort Faiella, Eliodoro
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models have been investigated for lymph node involvement (LNI) detection and prediction in Prostate cancer (PCa) patients, in order to reduce surgical risks and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to gather and analyze the few studies available in the literature to examine their initial findings. (2) Methods: Two reviewers conducted independently a search of MEDLINE databases, identifying articles exploring AI’s role in PCa LNI. Sixteen studies were selected, and their methodological quality was appraised using the Radiomics Quality Score. (3) Results: AI models in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based studies exhibited comparable LNI prediction accuracy to standard nomograms. Computed Tomography (CT)-based and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT models demonstrated high diagnostic and prognostic results. (4) Conclusions: AI models showed promising results in LN metastasis prediction and detection in PCa patients. Limitations of the reviewed studies encompass retrospective design, non-standardization, manual segmentation, and limited studies and participants. Further research is crucial to enhance AI tools’ effectiveness in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10672480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106724802023-11-10 Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review Faiella, Eliodoro Vaccarino, Federica Ragone, Raffaele D’Amone, Giulia Cirimele, Vincenzo Piccolo, Claudia Lucia Vertulli, Daniele Grasso, Rosario Francesco Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Santucci, Domiziana J Clin Med Systematic Review (1) Background: Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models have been investigated for lymph node involvement (LNI) detection and prediction in Prostate cancer (PCa) patients, in order to reduce surgical risks and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to gather and analyze the few studies available in the literature to examine their initial findings. (2) Methods: Two reviewers conducted independently a search of MEDLINE databases, identifying articles exploring AI’s role in PCa LNI. Sixteen studies were selected, and their methodological quality was appraised using the Radiomics Quality Score. (3) Results: AI models in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based studies exhibited comparable LNI prediction accuracy to standard nomograms. Computed Tomography (CT)-based and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT models demonstrated high diagnostic and prognostic results. (4) Conclusions: AI models showed promising results in LN metastasis prediction and detection in PCa patients. Limitations of the reviewed studies encompass retrospective design, non-standardization, manual segmentation, and limited studies and participants. Further research is crucial to enhance AI tools’ effectiveness in this area. MDPI 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10672480/ /pubmed/38002646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227032 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Faiella, Eliodoro
Vaccarino, Federica
Ragone, Raffaele
D’Amone, Giulia
Cirimele, Vincenzo
Piccolo, Claudia Lucia
Vertulli, Daniele
Grasso, Rosario Francesco
Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
Santucci, Domiziana
Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
title Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
title_full Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
title_fullStr Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
title_short Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
title_sort can machine learning models detect and predict lymph node involvement in prostate cancer? a comprehensive systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227032
work_keys_str_mv AT faiellaeliodoro canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT vaccarinofederica canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT ragoneraffaele canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT damonegiulia canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT cirimelevincenzo canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT piccoloclaudialucia canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT vertullidaniele canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT grassorosariofrancesco canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT zobelbrunobeomonte canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview
AT santuccidomiziana canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview