Cargando…
Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review
(1) Background: Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models have been investigated for lymph node involvement (LNI) detection and prediction in Prostate cancer (PCa) patients, in order to reduce surgical risks and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to gather and analyze the few studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227032 |
_version_ | 1785140401118642176 |
---|---|
author | Faiella, Eliodoro Vaccarino, Federica Ragone, Raffaele D’Amone, Giulia Cirimele, Vincenzo Piccolo, Claudia Lucia Vertulli, Daniele Grasso, Rosario Francesco Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Santucci, Domiziana |
author_facet | Faiella, Eliodoro Vaccarino, Federica Ragone, Raffaele D’Amone, Giulia Cirimele, Vincenzo Piccolo, Claudia Lucia Vertulli, Daniele Grasso, Rosario Francesco Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Santucci, Domiziana |
author_sort | Faiella, Eliodoro |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models have been investigated for lymph node involvement (LNI) detection and prediction in Prostate cancer (PCa) patients, in order to reduce surgical risks and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to gather and analyze the few studies available in the literature to examine their initial findings. (2) Methods: Two reviewers conducted independently a search of MEDLINE databases, identifying articles exploring AI’s role in PCa LNI. Sixteen studies were selected, and their methodological quality was appraised using the Radiomics Quality Score. (3) Results: AI models in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based studies exhibited comparable LNI prediction accuracy to standard nomograms. Computed Tomography (CT)-based and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT models demonstrated high diagnostic and prognostic results. (4) Conclusions: AI models showed promising results in LN metastasis prediction and detection in PCa patients. Limitations of the reviewed studies encompass retrospective design, non-standardization, manual segmentation, and limited studies and participants. Further research is crucial to enhance AI tools’ effectiveness in this area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10672480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106724802023-11-10 Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review Faiella, Eliodoro Vaccarino, Federica Ragone, Raffaele D’Amone, Giulia Cirimele, Vincenzo Piccolo, Claudia Lucia Vertulli, Daniele Grasso, Rosario Francesco Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Santucci, Domiziana J Clin Med Systematic Review (1) Background: Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models have been investigated for lymph node involvement (LNI) detection and prediction in Prostate cancer (PCa) patients, in order to reduce surgical risks and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to gather and analyze the few studies available in the literature to examine their initial findings. (2) Methods: Two reviewers conducted independently a search of MEDLINE databases, identifying articles exploring AI’s role in PCa LNI. Sixteen studies were selected, and their methodological quality was appraised using the Radiomics Quality Score. (3) Results: AI models in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based studies exhibited comparable LNI prediction accuracy to standard nomograms. Computed Tomography (CT)-based and Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT models demonstrated high diagnostic and prognostic results. (4) Conclusions: AI models showed promising results in LN metastasis prediction and detection in PCa patients. Limitations of the reviewed studies encompass retrospective design, non-standardization, manual segmentation, and limited studies and participants. Further research is crucial to enhance AI tools’ effectiveness in this area. MDPI 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10672480/ /pubmed/38002646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227032 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Faiella, Eliodoro Vaccarino, Federica Ragone, Raffaele D’Amone, Giulia Cirimele, Vincenzo Piccolo, Claudia Lucia Vertulli, Daniele Grasso, Rosario Francesco Zobel, Bruno Beomonte Santucci, Domiziana Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review |
title | Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review |
title_full | Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review |
title_short | Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review |
title_sort | can machine learning models detect and predict lymph node involvement in prostate cancer? a comprehensive systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38002646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faiellaeliodoro canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT vaccarinofederica canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT ragoneraffaele canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT damonegiulia canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT cirimelevincenzo canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT piccoloclaudialucia canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT vertullidaniele canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT grassorosariofrancesco canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT zobelbrunobeomonte canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview AT santuccidomiziana canmachinelearningmodelsdetectandpredictlymphnodeinvolvementinprostatecanceracomprehensivesystematicreview |