Cargando…

Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China

Introducing cover crops into maize rotation systems is widely practiced to increase crop productivity and achieve sustainable agricultural development, yet the potential for crop rotational diversity to contribute to environmental benefits in soils remains uncertain. Here, we investigated the effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Puchang, Xie, Wenhui, Ding, Leilei, Zhuo, Yingping, Gao, Yang, Li, Junqin, Zhao, Lili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112621
_version_ 1785140501759918080
author Wang, Puchang
Xie, Wenhui
Ding, Leilei
Zhuo, Yingping
Gao, Yang
Li, Junqin
Zhao, Lili
author_facet Wang, Puchang
Xie, Wenhui
Ding, Leilei
Zhuo, Yingping
Gao, Yang
Li, Junqin
Zhao, Lili
author_sort Wang, Puchang
collection PubMed
description Introducing cover crops into maize rotation systems is widely practiced to increase crop productivity and achieve sustainable agricultural development, yet the potential for crop rotational diversity to contribute to environmental benefits in soils remains uncertain. Here, we investigated the effects of different crop rotation patterns on the physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial communities in soils from field experiments. Crop rotation patterns included (i) pure maize monoculture (CC), (ii) maize–garlic (CG), (iii) maize–rape (CR) and (iv) maize–annual ryegrass for one year (Cir1), two years (Cir2) and three years (Cir3). Our results showed that soil physicochemical properties varied in all rotation patterns, with higher total and available phosphorus concentrations in CG and CR and lower soil organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations in the maize–ryegrass rotations compared to CC. Specifically, soil fertility was ranked as CG > Cir2 > CR > Cir3 > CC > Cir1. CG decreased enzyme activities but enhanced microbial biomass. Cir2 decreased carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) acquiring enzyme activities and soil microbial C and N concentrations, but increased phosphorus (P) acquiring enzyme activities and microbial biomass P concentrations compared to CC. Soil bacterial and fungal diversity (Shannon index) were lower in CG and Cir2 compared to CC, while the richness (Chao1 index) was lower in CG, CR, Cir1 and Cir2. Most maize rotations notably augmented the relative abundance of soil bacteria, including Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes and Rokubacteria, while not necessarily decreasing the abundance of soil fungi like Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota and Anthophyta. Redundancy analysis indicated that nitrate-N, ammonium-N and microbial biomass N concentrations had a large impact on soil bacterial communities, whereas nitrate-N and ammonium-N, available P, soil organic C and microbial biomass C concentrations had a greater effect on soil fungal communities. In conclusion, maize rotations with garlic, rape and ryegrass distinctly modify soil properties and microbial compositions. Thus, we advocate for garlic and annual ryegrass as maize cover crops and recommend a two-year rotation for perennial ryegrass in Southwest China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10672910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106729102023-10-24 Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China Wang, Puchang Xie, Wenhui Ding, Leilei Zhuo, Yingping Gao, Yang Li, Junqin Zhao, Lili Microorganisms Article Introducing cover crops into maize rotation systems is widely practiced to increase crop productivity and achieve sustainable agricultural development, yet the potential for crop rotational diversity to contribute to environmental benefits in soils remains uncertain. Here, we investigated the effects of different crop rotation patterns on the physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial communities in soils from field experiments. Crop rotation patterns included (i) pure maize monoculture (CC), (ii) maize–garlic (CG), (iii) maize–rape (CR) and (iv) maize–annual ryegrass for one year (Cir1), two years (Cir2) and three years (Cir3). Our results showed that soil physicochemical properties varied in all rotation patterns, with higher total and available phosphorus concentrations in CG and CR and lower soil organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations in the maize–ryegrass rotations compared to CC. Specifically, soil fertility was ranked as CG > Cir2 > CR > Cir3 > CC > Cir1. CG decreased enzyme activities but enhanced microbial biomass. Cir2 decreased carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) acquiring enzyme activities and soil microbial C and N concentrations, but increased phosphorus (P) acquiring enzyme activities and microbial biomass P concentrations compared to CC. Soil bacterial and fungal diversity (Shannon index) were lower in CG and Cir2 compared to CC, while the richness (Chao1 index) was lower in CG, CR, Cir1 and Cir2. Most maize rotations notably augmented the relative abundance of soil bacteria, including Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes and Rokubacteria, while not necessarily decreasing the abundance of soil fungi like Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota and Anthophyta. Redundancy analysis indicated that nitrate-N, ammonium-N and microbial biomass N concentrations had a large impact on soil bacterial communities, whereas nitrate-N and ammonium-N, available P, soil organic C and microbial biomass C concentrations had a greater effect on soil fungal communities. In conclusion, maize rotations with garlic, rape and ryegrass distinctly modify soil properties and microbial compositions. Thus, we advocate for garlic and annual ryegrass as maize cover crops and recommend a two-year rotation for perennial ryegrass in Southwest China. MDPI 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10672910/ /pubmed/38004632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112621 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Puchang
Xie, Wenhui
Ding, Leilei
Zhuo, Yingping
Gao, Yang
Li, Junqin
Zhao, Lili
Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China
title Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China
title_full Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China
title_fullStr Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China
title_short Effects of Maize–Crop Rotation on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Community Structure in Southwest China
title_sort effects of maize–crop rotation on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial biomass and microbial community structure in southwest china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10672910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112621
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpuchang effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina
AT xiewenhui effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina
AT dingleilei effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina
AT zhuoyingping effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina
AT gaoyang effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina
AT lijunqin effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina
AT zhaolili effectsofmaizecroprotationonsoilphysicochemicalpropertiesenzymeactivitiesmicrobialbiomassandmicrobialcommunitystructureinsouthwestchina