Cargando…
Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions
Background and Objectives: In patients with peripheral artery disease, there is insufficient understanding of characteristics that predict successful revascularization of the lower extremity (LE) chronic total occlusions (CTOs) and baseline differences in demographic, clinical, and angiographic char...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59112029 |
_version_ | 1785149572248502272 |
---|---|
author | Kokkinidis, Damianos G. Schizas, Dimitrios Pargaonkar, Sumant Karamanis, Dimitrios Mylonas, Konstantinos S. Hasemaki, Natasha Palaiodimos, Leonidas Varrias, Dimitrios Tzavellas, Georgios Siasos, Gerasimos Klonaris, Christos Kharawala, Amrin Chlorogiannis, David-Dimitris Georgopoulos, Sotirios Bakoyiannis, Christos |
author_facet | Kokkinidis, Damianos G. Schizas, Dimitrios Pargaonkar, Sumant Karamanis, Dimitrios Mylonas, Konstantinos S. Hasemaki, Natasha Palaiodimos, Leonidas Varrias, Dimitrios Tzavellas, Georgios Siasos, Gerasimos Klonaris, Christos Kharawala, Amrin Chlorogiannis, David-Dimitris Georgopoulos, Sotirios Bakoyiannis, Christos |
author_sort | Kokkinidis, Damianos G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: In patients with peripheral artery disease, there is insufficient understanding of characteristics that predict successful revascularization of the lower extremity (LE) chronic total occlusions (CTOs) and baseline differences in demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics in patients with LE CTO vs. non-CTO. We aim to explore these differences and predictors of successful revascularization among CTO patients. Materials and Methods: Two vascular centers enrolled LE-CTO patients who underwent endovascular revascularization. Data on demographics, clinical, angiographic, and interventional characteristics were collected. LE non-CTO arterial stenosis patients were compared. A total of 256 patients with LE revascularization procedures were studied; among them, 120 had CTOs and 136 had LE stenosis but no CTOs. Results: Aspirin use (Odds ratio, OR: 3.43; CI 1.32–8.88; p = 0.011) was a positive predictor whereas a history of malignancy (OR: 0.27; CI 0.09–0.80; p = 0.018) was a negative predictor of successful crossing in the CTO group. The CTO group had a higher history of myocardial infarction (29.2 vs. 18.3%, p = 0.05), end-stage renal disease (19.2 vs. 9.6%, p = 0.03), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia as the reason for revascularization (64.2 vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001). They were more likely to have advanced TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) stages, multi-vessel revascularization procedures, longer lesions, and urgent treatment. Conclusions: The use of aspirin is a positive predictor whereas a history of malignancy is a negative predictor for successful crossing in CTO lesions. Additionally, LE-CTO patients have a higher incidence of comorbidities, which is expected given their higher disease burden. Successful endovascular re-vascularization can be associated with baseline clinical variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10673017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106730172023-11-17 Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions Kokkinidis, Damianos G. Schizas, Dimitrios Pargaonkar, Sumant Karamanis, Dimitrios Mylonas, Konstantinos S. Hasemaki, Natasha Palaiodimos, Leonidas Varrias, Dimitrios Tzavellas, Georgios Siasos, Gerasimos Klonaris, Christos Kharawala, Amrin Chlorogiannis, David-Dimitris Georgopoulos, Sotirios Bakoyiannis, Christos Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: In patients with peripheral artery disease, there is insufficient understanding of characteristics that predict successful revascularization of the lower extremity (LE) chronic total occlusions (CTOs) and baseline differences in demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics in patients with LE CTO vs. non-CTO. We aim to explore these differences and predictors of successful revascularization among CTO patients. Materials and Methods: Two vascular centers enrolled LE-CTO patients who underwent endovascular revascularization. Data on demographics, clinical, angiographic, and interventional characteristics were collected. LE non-CTO arterial stenosis patients were compared. A total of 256 patients with LE revascularization procedures were studied; among them, 120 had CTOs and 136 had LE stenosis but no CTOs. Results: Aspirin use (Odds ratio, OR: 3.43; CI 1.32–8.88; p = 0.011) was a positive predictor whereas a history of malignancy (OR: 0.27; CI 0.09–0.80; p = 0.018) was a negative predictor of successful crossing in the CTO group. The CTO group had a higher history of myocardial infarction (29.2 vs. 18.3%, p = 0.05), end-stage renal disease (19.2 vs. 9.6%, p = 0.03), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia as the reason for revascularization (64.2 vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001). They were more likely to have advanced TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) stages, multi-vessel revascularization procedures, longer lesions, and urgent treatment. Conclusions: The use of aspirin is a positive predictor whereas a history of malignancy is a negative predictor for successful crossing in CTO lesions. Additionally, LE-CTO patients have a higher incidence of comorbidities, which is expected given their higher disease burden. Successful endovascular re-vascularization can be associated with baseline clinical variables. MDPI 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10673017/ /pubmed/38004078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59112029 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kokkinidis, Damianos G. Schizas, Dimitrios Pargaonkar, Sumant Karamanis, Dimitrios Mylonas, Konstantinos S. Hasemaki, Natasha Palaiodimos, Leonidas Varrias, Dimitrios Tzavellas, Georgios Siasos, Gerasimos Klonaris, Christos Kharawala, Amrin Chlorogiannis, David-Dimitris Georgopoulos, Sotirios Bakoyiannis, Christos Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions |
title | Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions |
title_full | Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions |
title_fullStr | Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions |
title_short | Differences between Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion vs. Stenosis and Predictors of Successful Endovascular Interventions |
title_sort | differences between lower extremity arterial occlusion vs. stenosis and predictors of successful endovascular interventions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59112029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kokkinidisdamianosg differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT schizasdimitrios differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT pargaonkarsumant differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT karamanisdimitrios differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT mylonaskonstantinoss differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT hasemakinatasha differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT palaiodimosleonidas differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT varriasdimitrios differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT tzavellasgeorgios differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT siasosgerasimos differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT klonarischristos differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT kharawalaamrin differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT chlorogiannisdaviddimitris differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT georgopoulossotirios differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions AT bakoyiannischristos differencesbetweenlowerextremityarterialocclusionvsstenosisandpredictorsofsuccessfulendovascularinterventions |