Cargando…

Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

Background and Objective: There is a paucity of literature comparing unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UITLIF) with bilateral instrumented TLIF (BITLIF) regarding radiological alignment, including the coronal balance, even though UITLIF might have asymmetric characteris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sung Cheol, Bae, Jae Seong, Jung, Seon Ok, Sung, Kyeong-Hoon, Chung, Hoon-Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111898
_version_ 1785140573369270272
author Park, Sung Cheol
Bae, Jae Seong
Jung, Seon Ok
Sung, Kyeong-Hoon
Chung, Hoon-Jae
author_facet Park, Sung Cheol
Bae, Jae Seong
Jung, Seon Ok
Sung, Kyeong-Hoon
Chung, Hoon-Jae
author_sort Park, Sung Cheol
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective: There is a paucity of literature comparing unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UITLIF) with bilateral instrumented TLIF (BITLIF) regarding radiological alignment, including the coronal balance, even though UITLIF might have asymmetric characteristics in the coronal plane. This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and long-term radiological outcomes of 1-level UITLIF and BITLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) including lumbar spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis (degenerative or spondylolytic). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent 1-level UITLIF with two rectangular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages or BITLIF between November 2009 and June 2016 by four surgeons with ≥5 years of follow-up at a single hospital were included. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between the UITLIF and BITLIF. Results: In total, 63 and 111 patients who underwent UITLIF and BITLIF, respectively, were enrolled. The median follow-up was 85.55 months (range: 60–130). The UITLIF group had a significantly shorter operation time (185.0 [170.0–210.0] vs. 225.0 [200.0–265.0], p < 0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (300.0 [250.0–500.0] vs. 550.0 [400.0–800.0], p < 0.001) than the BITLIF group. Regarding the clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences in the intermittent claudication score (p = 0.495) and Kirkaldy–Willis criteria (p = 0.707) at 1 year postoperatively. The interval changes in the local coronal Cobb angle at the index level, L1-S1 lordotic angle, and coronal off-balance from the immediate postoperative radiograph to the last follow-up were not significantly different (p = 0.687, p = 0.701, and p = 0.367, respectively). Conclusions: UITLIF with two rectangular PEEK cages may provide comparable clinical outcomes and radiological longevity including coronal alignment to BITLIF in 1-level LDD. In addition, UITLIF has advantages over BITLIF in terms of operative time and blood loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10673228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106732282023-10-26 Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up Park, Sung Cheol Bae, Jae Seong Jung, Seon Ok Sung, Kyeong-Hoon Chung, Hoon-Jae Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objective: There is a paucity of literature comparing unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UITLIF) with bilateral instrumented TLIF (BITLIF) regarding radiological alignment, including the coronal balance, even though UITLIF might have asymmetric characteristics in the coronal plane. This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and long-term radiological outcomes of 1-level UITLIF and BITLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) including lumbar spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis (degenerative or spondylolytic). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent 1-level UITLIF with two rectangular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages or BITLIF between November 2009 and June 2016 by four surgeons with ≥5 years of follow-up at a single hospital were included. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between the UITLIF and BITLIF. Results: In total, 63 and 111 patients who underwent UITLIF and BITLIF, respectively, were enrolled. The median follow-up was 85.55 months (range: 60–130). The UITLIF group had a significantly shorter operation time (185.0 [170.0–210.0] vs. 225.0 [200.0–265.0], p < 0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (300.0 [250.0–500.0] vs. 550.0 [400.0–800.0], p < 0.001) than the BITLIF group. Regarding the clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences in the intermittent claudication score (p = 0.495) and Kirkaldy–Willis criteria (p = 0.707) at 1 year postoperatively. The interval changes in the local coronal Cobb angle at the index level, L1-S1 lordotic angle, and coronal off-balance from the immediate postoperative radiograph to the last follow-up were not significantly different (p = 0.687, p = 0.701, and p = 0.367, respectively). Conclusions: UITLIF with two rectangular PEEK cages may provide comparable clinical outcomes and radiological longevity including coronal alignment to BITLIF in 1-level LDD. In addition, UITLIF has advantages over BITLIF in terms of operative time and blood loss. MDPI 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10673228/ /pubmed/38003948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111898 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Park, Sung Cheol
Bae, Jae Seong
Jung, Seon Ok
Sung, Kyeong-Hoon
Chung, Hoon-Jae
Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
title Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
title_full Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
title_short Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
title_sort comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a minimum of 5-year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38003948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111898
work_keys_str_mv AT parksungcheol comparisonofunilateralversusbilateralinstrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninlumbardegenerativediseasesaminimumof5yearfollowup
AT baejaeseong comparisonofunilateralversusbilateralinstrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninlumbardegenerativediseasesaminimumof5yearfollowup
AT jungseonok comparisonofunilateralversusbilateralinstrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninlumbardegenerativediseasesaminimumof5yearfollowup
AT sungkyeonghoon comparisonofunilateralversusbilateralinstrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninlumbardegenerativediseasesaminimumof5yearfollowup
AT chunghoonjae comparisonofunilateralversusbilateralinstrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninlumbardegenerativediseasesaminimumof5yearfollowup