Cargando…

Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence

Background and Objectives: Strategies for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) management involve, among others, strengthening the bladder outlet to suppress urgency and neuromodulating the sacral roots. Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a technology that involves an extracorporeal device that is able to pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barba, Marta, Cola, Alice, Rezzan, Giorgia, Costa, Clarissa, Re, Ilaria, Volontè, Silvia, Terzoni, Stefano, Frigerio, Matteo, Maruccia, Serena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111999
_version_ 1785149621982461952
author Barba, Marta
Cola, Alice
Rezzan, Giorgia
Costa, Clarissa
Re, Ilaria
Volontè, Silvia
Terzoni, Stefano
Frigerio, Matteo
Maruccia, Serena
author_facet Barba, Marta
Cola, Alice
Rezzan, Giorgia
Costa, Clarissa
Re, Ilaria
Volontè, Silvia
Terzoni, Stefano
Frigerio, Matteo
Maruccia, Serena
author_sort Barba, Marta
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Strategies for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) management involve, among others, strengthening the bladder outlet to suppress urgency and neuromodulating the sacral roots. Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a technology that involves an extracorporeal device that is able to provide an electromagnetic field specifically designed to interact with pelvic floor neuromuscular tissue. The resulting tissue electrical activity induces contraction of the pelvic muscle and neuromodulation of the S2–S4 sacral roots. Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) is a relevant advancement involving homogeneous electromagnetic fields, which are able to optimize the effect on the entire pelvic area. However, the benefits of this new technology for OAB syndrome are poorly known. Consequently, the aim of our study is to analyze the outcomes and quality of life (QoL) impact of FMS with Dr. Arnold (DEKA, Calenzano, Italy) in women suffering from OAB syndrome associated with urinary incontinence. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients with OAB, urge urinary incontinence, and no ongoing OAB treatments. At baseline (T0), the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-19), and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) were collected. Patients underwent 8 FMS sessions of 25 min each in one month. At the termination of the therapy (T1), women repeated the ICIQ-UI SF, FSFI-19, and IIQ-7 tools. Moreover, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was collected to evaluate the cure rate. Results: Our study enrolled a total of 57 consecutive patients. Most women had at least one second- or third-line treatment before FMS, while the remaining naive patients had contraindications to pharmacological treatments. No women reported adverse effects during the treatment. After the treatment, we observed a decrease in the IIQ-7 (p < 0.001) and ICIQ-UI SF scores (p < 0.001) and an improvement in sexual function (p < 0.001) evaluated with FSFI-19. According to PGI-I scores, 42 (73.7%) women referred to some kind of improvement, scoring ≤ 3 points. Specifically, 8.7% of patients considered themselves very much improved, 29.8% much improved, 35.1% minimally improved, and 26.3% found no changes. FMS was effective in treating OAB symptoms without any adverse effects. The mechanism is supposed to be related to suppressing the initiation of micturition. This makes FMS a promising device for treating naive and refractory urge urinary incontinence. Conclusions: The new FMS represents a promising non-pharmacological option for the treatment of naive and refractory OAB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10673601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106736012023-11-14 Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence Barba, Marta Cola, Alice Rezzan, Giorgia Costa, Clarissa Re, Ilaria Volontè, Silvia Terzoni, Stefano Frigerio, Matteo Maruccia, Serena Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Strategies for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) management involve, among others, strengthening the bladder outlet to suppress urgency and neuromodulating the sacral roots. Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a technology that involves an extracorporeal device that is able to provide an electromagnetic field specifically designed to interact with pelvic floor neuromuscular tissue. The resulting tissue electrical activity induces contraction of the pelvic muscle and neuromodulation of the S2–S4 sacral roots. Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) is a relevant advancement involving homogeneous electromagnetic fields, which are able to optimize the effect on the entire pelvic area. However, the benefits of this new technology for OAB syndrome are poorly known. Consequently, the aim of our study is to analyze the outcomes and quality of life (QoL) impact of FMS with Dr. Arnold (DEKA, Calenzano, Italy) in women suffering from OAB syndrome associated with urinary incontinence. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients with OAB, urge urinary incontinence, and no ongoing OAB treatments. At baseline (T0), the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-19), and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) were collected. Patients underwent 8 FMS sessions of 25 min each in one month. At the termination of the therapy (T1), women repeated the ICIQ-UI SF, FSFI-19, and IIQ-7 tools. Moreover, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was collected to evaluate the cure rate. Results: Our study enrolled a total of 57 consecutive patients. Most women had at least one second- or third-line treatment before FMS, while the remaining naive patients had contraindications to pharmacological treatments. No women reported adverse effects during the treatment. After the treatment, we observed a decrease in the IIQ-7 (p < 0.001) and ICIQ-UI SF scores (p < 0.001) and an improvement in sexual function (p < 0.001) evaluated with FSFI-19. According to PGI-I scores, 42 (73.7%) women referred to some kind of improvement, scoring ≤ 3 points. Specifically, 8.7% of patients considered themselves very much improved, 29.8% much improved, 35.1% minimally improved, and 26.3% found no changes. FMS was effective in treating OAB symptoms without any adverse effects. The mechanism is supposed to be related to suppressing the initiation of micturition. This makes FMS a promising device for treating naive and refractory urge urinary incontinence. Conclusions: The new FMS represents a promising non-pharmacological option for the treatment of naive and refractory OAB. MDPI 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10673601/ /pubmed/38004048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111999 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barba, Marta
Cola, Alice
Rezzan, Giorgia
Costa, Clarissa
Re, Ilaria
Volontè, Silvia
Terzoni, Stefano
Frigerio, Matteo
Maruccia, Serena
Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence
title Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence
title_full Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence
title_fullStr Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence
title_short Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence
title_sort flat magnetic stimulation for urge urinary incontinence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111999
work_keys_str_mv AT barbamarta flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT colaalice flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT rezzangiorgia flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT costaclarissa flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT reilaria flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT volontesilvia flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT terzonistefano flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT frigeriomatteo flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence
AT marucciaserena flatmagneticstimulationforurgeurinaryincontinence