Cargando…

Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates

BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilm is a significant virulence factor threatening patients, leading to chronic infections and economic burdens. Therefore, it is crucial to identify biofilm production, its inhibition, and reduction. In this study, we investigated biofilm production among Gram-negative isol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Ojaswee, Shrestha, Nabina, Khanal, Sadhana, Pokhrel, Sushant, Maharjan, Sujina, Thapa, Tika Bahadur, Khanal, Puspa Raj, Joshi, Govardhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6619268
_version_ 1785149628702785536
author Shrestha, Ojaswee
Shrestha, Nabina
Khanal, Sadhana
Pokhrel, Sushant
Maharjan, Sujina
Thapa, Tika Bahadur
Khanal, Puspa Raj
Joshi, Govardhan
author_facet Shrestha, Ojaswee
Shrestha, Nabina
Khanal, Sadhana
Pokhrel, Sushant
Maharjan, Sujina
Thapa, Tika Bahadur
Khanal, Puspa Raj
Joshi, Govardhan
author_sort Shrestha, Ojaswee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilm is a significant virulence factor threatening patients, leading to chronic infections and economic burdens. Therefore, it is crucial to identify biofilm production, its inhibition, and reduction. In this study, we investigated biofilm production among Gram-negative isolates and assessed the inhibitory and reduction potential of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) towards them. In addition, we studied the antimicrobial resistance pattern of the Gram-negative isolates. METHODS: Bacterial isolation and identification was done using standard microbiological techniques, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline, 28th edition. The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method was used to determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates, and β-lactamase production was tested via the combination disk method. Biofilm formation was detected through the tissue culture plate (TCP) method. Different concentrations of EDTA and DMSO were used to determine their inhibitory and reduction properties against the biofilm. Both inhibition and reduction by the various concentrations of EDTA and DMSO were analyzed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Among the 110 clinical isolates, 61.8% (68) were found to be multidrug resistant (MDR). 30% (33/110) of the isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, 14.5% (16/110) were metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), and 8% (9/110) were Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producers. Biofilm formation was detected in 35.4% of the isolates. Biofilm-producing organisms showed the highest resistance to antibiotics such as cephalosporins, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and carbapenem. The inhibition and reduction of biofilm were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for 1 mM of EDTA and 2% of DMSO. CONCLUSION: Isolates forming biofilm had a higher resistance rate and β-lactamase production compared to biofilm nonproducers. EDTA and DMSO were found to be potential antibiofilm agents. Hence, EDTA and DMSO might be an effective antibiofilm agent to control biofilm-associated infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10673669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106736692023-11-17 Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates Shrestha, Ojaswee Shrestha, Nabina Khanal, Sadhana Pokhrel, Sushant Maharjan, Sujina Thapa, Tika Bahadur Khanal, Puspa Raj Joshi, Govardhan Int J Biomater Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilm is a significant virulence factor threatening patients, leading to chronic infections and economic burdens. Therefore, it is crucial to identify biofilm production, its inhibition, and reduction. In this study, we investigated biofilm production among Gram-negative isolates and assessed the inhibitory and reduction potential of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) towards them. In addition, we studied the antimicrobial resistance pattern of the Gram-negative isolates. METHODS: Bacterial isolation and identification was done using standard microbiological techniques, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline, 28th edition. The Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method was used to determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates, and β-lactamase production was tested via the combination disk method. Biofilm formation was detected through the tissue culture plate (TCP) method. Different concentrations of EDTA and DMSO were used to determine their inhibitory and reduction properties against the biofilm. Both inhibition and reduction by the various concentrations of EDTA and DMSO were analyzed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Among the 110 clinical isolates, 61.8% (68) were found to be multidrug resistant (MDR). 30% (33/110) of the isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, 14.5% (16/110) were metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), and 8% (9/110) were Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producers. Biofilm formation was detected in 35.4% of the isolates. Biofilm-producing organisms showed the highest resistance to antibiotics such as cephalosporins, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and carbapenem. The inhibition and reduction of biofilm were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for 1 mM of EDTA and 2% of DMSO. CONCLUSION: Isolates forming biofilm had a higher resistance rate and β-lactamase production compared to biofilm nonproducers. EDTA and DMSO were found to be potential antibiofilm agents. Hence, EDTA and DMSO might be an effective antibiofilm agent to control biofilm-associated infections. Hindawi 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10673669/ /pubmed/38023107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6619268 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ojaswee Shrestha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shrestha, Ojaswee
Shrestha, Nabina
Khanal, Sadhana
Pokhrel, Sushant
Maharjan, Sujina
Thapa, Tika Bahadur
Khanal, Puspa Raj
Joshi, Govardhan
Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates
title Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates
title_full Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates
title_fullStr Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates
title_full_unstemmed Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates
title_short Inhibition and Reduction of Biofilm Production along with Their Antibiogram Pattern among Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates
title_sort inhibition and reduction of biofilm production along with their antibiogram pattern among gram-negative clinical isolates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6619268
work_keys_str_mv AT shresthaojaswee inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT shresthanabina inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT khanalsadhana inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT pokhrelsushant inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT maharjansujina inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT thapatikabahadur inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT khanalpusparaj inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates
AT joshigovardhan inhibitionandreductionofbiofilmproductionalongwiththeirantibiogrampatternamonggramnegativeclinicalisolates