Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn’s Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn’s disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansen, Fenna M, van Linschoten, Reinier C A, Kievit, Wietske, Smits, Lisa J T, Pauwels, Renske W M, de Jong, Dirk J, de Vries, Annemarie C, Boekema, Paul J, West, Rachel L, Bodelier, Alexander G L, Gisbertz, Ingrid A M, Wolfhagen, Frank H J, Römkens, Tessa E H, Lutgens, Maurice W M D, van Bodegraven, Adriaan A, Oldenburg, Bas, Pierik, Marieke J, Russel, Maurice G V M, de Boer, Nanne K, Mallant-Hent, Rosalie C, ter Borg, Pieter C J, van der Meulen-de Jong, Andrea E, Jansen, Jeroen M, Jansen, Sita V, Tan, Adrianus C I T L, Hoentjen, Frank, van der Woude, C Janneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn’s disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels. RESULTS: We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: −0.017, 95% confidence interval [−0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (−€943, [−€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (−€2545, [−€2780; −€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost–utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [−€2099; €2050], €69 [−€2908; €1965] and −€455 [−€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION: When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.