Cargando…
Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients
Minimally invasive autopsies (MIAs) allow the collection of tissue samples for diagnostic and research purposes in special situations, e.g., when there is a high risk of infection which is the case in the context of COVID-19 or restrictions due to legal or personal reasons. We performed MIA to analy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03622-6 |
_version_ | 1785140734485069824 |
---|---|
author | Noack, Petar Grosse, Claudia Bodingbauer, Jacob Almeder, Marion Lohfink-Schumm, Sylvia Salzer, Helmut J.F. Meier, Jens Lamprecht, Bernd Schmitt, Clemens A. Langer, Rupert |
author_facet | Noack, Petar Grosse, Claudia Bodingbauer, Jacob Almeder, Marion Lohfink-Schumm, Sylvia Salzer, Helmut J.F. Meier, Jens Lamprecht, Bernd Schmitt, Clemens A. Langer, Rupert |
author_sort | Noack, Petar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minimally invasive autopsies (MIAs) allow the collection of tissue samples for diagnostic and research purposes in special situations, e.g., when there is a high risk of infection which is the case in the context of COVID-19 or restrictions due to legal or personal reasons. We performed MIA to analyze lung tissue from 92 COVID-19 patients (mean age 78 years; range 48–98; 35 women, 57 men), representing 44% of all patients who died from the disease between October 2020 and April 2021. An intercostal approach was used with removal of a 5-cm rib section followed by manual collection of four lung tissue samples (5–8 cm in size). Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was found in 89 (97%) patients at various stages. Exudative DAD (eDAD) predominated in 18 (20%) patients, proliferative DAD (pDAD) in 43 (47%) patients, and mixed DAD (mDAD) in 31 (34%) patients. There were no significant differences in the predominant DAD pattern between tissue samples from the same patient. Additional purulent components were present in 46 (50%) cases. Fungi were detected in 11 (12%) patients. The pDAD pattern was associated with longer hospital stay including intensive care unit (p=0.026 and p<0.001) and younger age (p=0.019). Positive bronchoalveolar lavage and blood cultures were observed more frequently in pDAD patterns (p<0.001; p=0.018). In contrast, there was no significant association between intravital positive microbiological results and superimposed bronchopneumonia or fungal infection at autopsy. Having demonstrated the characteristic lung changes in a large longitudinal autopsy series, we conclude that the presented MIA approach can be considered a reliable and safe method for performing post mortem lung diagnostics in COVID-19 and other high-risk situations. The lack of correlation between histological changes indicative of bacterial or fungal superinfection and microbiology could have clinical implications for disease and treatment surveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10673967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106739672023-09-01 Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients Noack, Petar Grosse, Claudia Bodingbauer, Jacob Almeder, Marion Lohfink-Schumm, Sylvia Salzer, Helmut J.F. Meier, Jens Lamprecht, Bernd Schmitt, Clemens A. Langer, Rupert Virchows Arch Original Article Minimally invasive autopsies (MIAs) allow the collection of tissue samples for diagnostic and research purposes in special situations, e.g., when there is a high risk of infection which is the case in the context of COVID-19 or restrictions due to legal or personal reasons. We performed MIA to analyze lung tissue from 92 COVID-19 patients (mean age 78 years; range 48–98; 35 women, 57 men), representing 44% of all patients who died from the disease between October 2020 and April 2021. An intercostal approach was used with removal of a 5-cm rib section followed by manual collection of four lung tissue samples (5–8 cm in size). Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was found in 89 (97%) patients at various stages. Exudative DAD (eDAD) predominated in 18 (20%) patients, proliferative DAD (pDAD) in 43 (47%) patients, and mixed DAD (mDAD) in 31 (34%) patients. There were no significant differences in the predominant DAD pattern between tissue samples from the same patient. Additional purulent components were present in 46 (50%) cases. Fungi were detected in 11 (12%) patients. The pDAD pattern was associated with longer hospital stay including intensive care unit (p=0.026 and p<0.001) and younger age (p=0.019). Positive bronchoalveolar lavage and blood cultures were observed more frequently in pDAD patterns (p<0.001; p=0.018). In contrast, there was no significant association between intravital positive microbiological results and superimposed bronchopneumonia or fungal infection at autopsy. Having demonstrated the characteristic lung changes in a large longitudinal autopsy series, we conclude that the presented MIA approach can be considered a reliable and safe method for performing post mortem lung diagnostics in COVID-19 and other high-risk situations. The lack of correlation between histological changes indicative of bacterial or fungal superinfection and microbiology could have clinical implications for disease and treatment surveillance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10673967/ /pubmed/37653260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03622-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Noack, Petar Grosse, Claudia Bodingbauer, Jacob Almeder, Marion Lohfink-Schumm, Sylvia Salzer, Helmut J.F. Meier, Jens Lamprecht, Bernd Schmitt, Clemens A. Langer, Rupert Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
title | Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
title_full | Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
title_short | Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
title_sort | minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of covid-19—experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03622-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noackpetar minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT grosseclaudia minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT bodingbauerjacob minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT almedermarion minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT lohfinkschummsylvia minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT salzerhelmutjf minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT meierjens minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT lamprechtbernd minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT schmittclemensa minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients AT langerrupert minimallyinvasiveautopsiesfortheinvestigationofpulmonarypathologyofcovid19experiencesofalongitudinalseriesof92patients |